• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肢体置换手术中的骨整合:互联网上信息的质量与可读性分析

Osseointegration in Limb Replacement Surgery: A Quality and Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet.

作者信息

Stanley Ciaran, Sheridan Gerard A, Page Brian J, Hoellwarth Jason S, Reif Taylor J, Rozbruch S Robert

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, United States.

出版信息

Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2024 Sep-Dec;19(3):131-134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1632. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1632
PMID:40224151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11982902/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Osseointegrated limb surgery for amputees is becoming increasingly common due to its advantages over traditional socket prostheses. Institutions worldwide are developing services to offer this option to suitable patients and are promoting these services online. This study aims to assess the quality and readability of the online information provided.

METHODS

The three most popular search engines using the English language were searched, and the first 40 websites from each search were included. All included websites were assessed for reading using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) (equivalent to the United States reading grade level), the Gunning Fog Index (G-Fog) and the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE). A quality assessment was conducted using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and the Health on the Net Certificate (HONC).

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 9,985,000 websites, of which the top 120 were assessed. Of the 23 websites in the final analysis, none had a reading grade level of sixth grade or lower. The lowest FKGL reading grade was 9.7/18, with a mean of 11.3/18 (95% CI 10.72-11.93), which corresponds with the reading level of a high school junior. The mean FRE was 38.83/100 (95% CI 36.16-41.49). The mean G-Fog score was 12.57/20 (95% CI 11.71-13.42) (representing reading levels of a college freshman). None of the 23 websites had HON certification. The mean JAMA score was 1.76 out of 4 (95% CI 1.34-2.18), meaning the information was of low to moderate quality. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery Osseointegration Information Score was 5.70 out of 16 (95% CI 4.33-7.06), indicating low quality.

DISCUSSION

A significant amount of online information is available about osseointegrated limb replacement surgery (OLRS). However, much of this content is written at a level that many patients may find difficult to understand, limiting usefulness. Additionally, the overall quality of the available information is generally low. Improving both the readability and quality of this information is essential to ensure patients have access to accurate and accessible details.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Stanley C, Sheridan GA, Page BJ, . Osseointegration in Limb Replacement Surgery: A Quality and Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(3):131-134.

摘要

引言

由于骨整合肢体手术相较于传统套筒式假肢具有优势,其在截肢患者中越来越普遍。全球各地的机构都在开发相关服务,以便为合适的患者提供这一选择,并在网上推广这些服务。本研究旨在评估所提供的在线信息的质量和可读性。

方法

搜索了三个最受欢迎的英文搜索引擎,每个搜索结果中的前40个网站被纳入研究。所有纳入的网站都使用弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)(相当于美国阅读年级水平)、冈宁雾度指数(G-Fog)和弗莱什阅读易读性(FRE)进行可读性评估。使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准和网络健康证书(HONC)进行质量评估。

结果

初步搜索产生了9985000个网站,其中对前120个进行了评估。在最终分析的23个网站中,没有一个的阅读年级水平为六年级或更低。最低的FKGL阅读年级为9.7/18,平均为11.3/18(95%置信区间10.72-11.93),这相当于初中三年级的阅读水平。平均FRE为38.83/100(95%置信区间36.16-41.49)。平均G-Fog评分为12.57/20(95%置信区间11.71-13.42)(代表大学一年级的阅读水平)。23个网站中没有一个获得HON认证。JAMA平均得分为4分中的1.76分(95%置信区间1.34-2.18),这意味着信息质量低至中等。特殊外科医院骨整合信息平均得分为16分中的5.70分(95%置信区间4.33-7.06),表明质量较低。

讨论

关于骨整合肢体置换手术(OLRS)有大量的在线信息。然而,这些内容大多的撰写水平可能会让许多患者难以理解,从而限制了其有用性。此外,现有信息的整体质量普遍较低。提高这些信息的可读性和质量对于确保患者能够获取准确且易懂的细节至关重要。

如何引用本文

斯坦利C,谢里丹GA,佩奇BJ等。肢体置换手术中的骨整合:互联网信息的质量和可读性分析。《创伤肢体重建策略》2024;19(3):131-134。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/5ba27fe7823b/stlr-19-131-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/5a33f3c153ec/stlr-19-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/0cbe3c510d00/stlr-19-131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/5ba27fe7823b/stlr-19-131-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/5a33f3c153ec/stlr-19-131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/0cbe3c510d00/stlr-19-131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab01/11982902/5ba27fe7823b/stlr-19-131-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Osseointegration in Limb Replacement Surgery: A Quality and Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet.肢体置换手术中的骨整合:互联网上信息的质量与可读性分析
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2024 Sep-Dec;19(3):131-134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1632. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Information for Patients and Their Families Regarding Schizophrenia.评估关于精神分裂症的患者及其家属的在线信息的可读性和质量。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2024 May 1;212(5):278-283. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001763. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
4
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
5
Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.与膝关节翻修置换术相关的患者在线信息的可读性及质量:一项客观分析。
Surgeon. 2022 Dec;20(6):e366-e370. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.009. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
6
Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.胶质母细胞瘤:在线信息可读性和可靠性的评估。
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;35(5):551-554. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1905772. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.基于网络的鼻咽癌患者信息的可读性与质量:定量内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 27;7:e47762. doi: 10.2196/47762.
8
Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.膝关节周围截骨术:在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.下腔静脉滤器 - 评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101695. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101695. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).评估经皮神经电刺激(TENS)在线患者教育材料的可读性、质量和可靠性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 21;102(16):e33529. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033529.

本文引用的文献

1
Modern Internet Search Analytics and Osseointegration: What are Patients Asking and Reading Online?现代互联网搜索分析与骨整合:患者在网上询问和阅读的内容是什么?
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2023 Sep-Dec;18(3):163-168. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1603.
2
Losing your head? An evaluation of the readability and reliability of patient information available online for avascular necrosis of the head of the femur.失去理智了吗?对在线提供的股骨头缺血性坏死患者信息的可读性和可靠性的评估。
Surgeon. 2023 Dec;21(6):e323-e327. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.
踝关节融合术:互联网上与踝关节融合术相关的信息的质量和可读性。
Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):e507-e511. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet.翻修全髋关节置换术:互联网上信息的质量与可读性分析。
World J Orthop. 2020 Feb 18;11(2):82-89. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i2.82.
5
Orthopaedic osseointegration: Implantology and future directions.骨科骨整合:种植学与未来方向。
J Orthop Res. 2020 Jul;38(7):1445-1454. doi: 10.1002/jor.24576. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.克莱恩病:在线信息的质量、准确性和可读性。
Hand (N Y). 2020 Jul;15(4):563-572. doi: 10.1177/1558944718813631. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
7
Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation : The pioneering Swedish model.截肢后康复用骨整合假体:开创性的瑞典模式。
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Apr;120(4):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0331-4.
8
Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.马尾综合征:评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):E645-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000282.
9
Development and validation of motivational messages to improve prescription medication adherence for patients with chronic health problems.开发和验证激励信息,以提高患有慢性健康问题的患者对处方药物的依从性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
Biology of implant osseointegration.种植体骨结合生物学
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):61-71.