• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

踝关节融合术:互联网上与踝关节融合术相关的信息的质量和可读性。

Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Orthopaedics, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):e507-e511. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.001
PMID:33451875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The internet is an important source of information for patients undergoing surgery. Multiple studies have identified inappropriately high reading levels of patient information online. The average reading level in the United States is 7-8th grade. Multiple organisations have recommended that patient information not exceed 6th grade level. This study aims to evaluate the reading levels and quality of information regarding ankle fusion surgery online.

METHODS

Google, Bing and Yahoo were searched (MeSH "ankle fusion", "ankle arthrodesis") and the top 30 URLs analysed. Readability was assessed using an online readability calculator to produce 3 scores (Gunning FOG, Flesch Kincaid Grade and Flesch Reading Ease). Quality was assessed using a HONcode detection web-extension and the JAMA benchmark criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight webpages were identified. The mean Flesch Kincaid Grade level was 9.24 ± 2.33 (95% CI 8.78-9.71). The mean Gunning FOG grade was 10.88 ± 3.1 (95% CI 10.26-11.5). The mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 49.88 ± 14.46 (95% CI 46.98-52.78). 7 webpages were at or below the 6th grade reading level. The mean JAMA score was 1.34 ± 1.32 out of 4 (95% CI 1.07-1.6). 14 websites were HONcode accredited.

CONCLUSION

The overall readability of medical information online is too high for the average patient. Given the important role that health literacy provides in patient reported outcomes, improving the readability and quality of these materials is imperative. Awareness by the general public is essential for them to critically appraise the information they receive online.

摘要

背景

互联网是患者接受手术的重要信息来源。多项研究发现,在线患者信息的阅读水平过高。美国的平均阅读水平为 7-8 年级。多个组织建议患者信息的阅读水平不要超过 6 年级。本研究旨在评估有关踝关节融合手术的在线信息的阅读水平和质量。

方法

在 Google、Bing 和 Yahoo 上进行搜索(MeSH“踝关节融合”、“踝关节融合术”),并分析前 30 个 URL。使用在线可读性计算器评估可读性,生成 3 个分数(Gunning FOG、Flesch Kincaid 等级和 Flesch 阅读舒适度)。使用 HONcode 检测网络扩展和 JAMA 基准标准评估质量。

结果

确定了 98 个网页。Flesch Kincaid 等级的平均值为 9.24±2.33(95%CI 8.78-9.71)。Gunning FOG 等级的平均值为 10.88±3.1(95%CI 10.26-11.5)。Flesch 阅读舒适度的平均值为 49.88±14.46(95%CI 46.98-52.78)。7 个网页的阅读水平达到或低于 6 年级。JAMA 平均得分为 1.34±1.32,满分 4 分(95%CI 1.07-1.6)。14 个网站是 HONcode 认证的。

结论

在线医疗信息的整体可读性对于普通患者来说过高。鉴于健康素养在患者报告结果中的重要作用,提高这些材料的可读性和质量至关重要。公众的意识对于他们批判性地评估他们在线收到的信息至关重要。

相似文献

1
Ankle conFUSION: The quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis.踝关节融合术:互联网上与踝关节融合术相关的信息的质量和可读性。
Surgeon. 2021 Dec;19(6):e507-e511. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
2
Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis.与膝关节翻修置换术相关的患者在线信息的可读性及质量:一项客观分析。
Surgeon. 2022 Dec;20(6):e366-e370. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.009. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Losing your head? An evaluation of the readability and reliability of patient information available online for avascular necrosis of the head of the femur.失去理智了吗?对在线提供的股骨头缺血性坏死患者信息的可读性和可靠性的评估。
Surgeon. 2023 Dec;21(6):e323-e327. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Readability and quality of online information on total ankle arthroplasty.全踝关节置换术在线信息的可读性与质量
Foot (Edinb). 2023 Mar;54:101985. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101985. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
6
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
8
Readability of Online Hand Surgery Patient Educational Materials: Evaluating the Trend Since 2008.在线手部手术患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的趋势
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):186.e1-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 May 20.
9
IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.下腔静脉滤器 - 评估互联网上患者信息的可读性和质量。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101695. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101695. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.膝关节周围截骨术:在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
U-shaped association between social media usage frequency and suggestibility by internet health information in Chinese online population with pre-diabetes and diabetes: a cross-sectional study.社交媒体使用频率与中国糖尿病前期和糖尿病在线人群受互联网健康信息影响的易受暗示性之间的U型关联:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):1525. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22724-1.
2
Osseointegration in Limb Replacement Surgery: A Quality and Readability Analysis of Information on the Internet.肢体置换手术中的骨整合:互联网上信息的质量与可读性分析
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2024 Sep-Dec;19(3):131-134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1632. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
AI in Dental Radiology-Improving the Efficiency of Reporting With ChatGPT: Comparative Study.
牙科放射学中的人工智能——利用ChatGPT提高报告效率:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 23;26:e60684. doi: 10.2196/60684.
4
Thematic coverage and readability of online patient information on cochlear implant care.关于人工耳蜗护理的在线患者信息的主题覆盖范围和可读性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4727-4734. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08694-x. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
Analysis of the Most Popular Online Ankle Fracture-Related Patient Education Materials.最受欢迎的在线踝关节骨折相关患者教育材料分析。
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Apr 3;9(2):24730114241241310. doi: 10.1177/24730114241241310. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Readability of Online Information on Core Decompression of the Hip for Avascular Necrosis.关于股骨头缺血性坏死髋关节核心减压的在线信息可读性
Cureus. 2023 Dec 10;15(12):e50298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50298. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Readability of Online Information on the Latarjet Procedure.关于拉塔热手术的在线信息可读性。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49184. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49184. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
How Efficient Is ChatGPT in Accessing Accurate and Quality Health-Related Information?ChatGPT在获取准确且高质量的健康相关信息方面效率如何?
Cureus. 2023 Oct 7;15(10):e46662. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46662. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Rotator cuff repair: what questions are patients asking online and where are they getting their answers?肩袖修复术:患者在网上问哪些问题,他们从哪里获得答案?
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):25-31. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01235. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
10
Evaluation of the quality of information online for arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术相关信息的在线质量评估。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 May;105(5):394-399. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0024. Epub 2022 May 31.