Suppr超能文献

情绪分化作为反刍行为后果的保护因素:社会焦虑情境下的概念复制与扩展

Emotion Differentiation as a Protective Factor Against the Behavioral Consequences of Rumination: A Conceptual Replication and Extension in the Context of Social Anxiety.

机构信息

Kent State University.

Kent State University.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2020 Jan;51(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 31.

Abstract

Rumination is thought to play a central role in affective disorders such as social anxiety disorder (SAD). Past research indicates that rumination tends to exacerbate negative emotions and increase the risk of engaging in maladaptive coping behaviors (e.g., avoiding social activities). However, little is known on how to effectively protect against the negative outcomes of rumination. Previously, Zaki, Coifman, Rafaeli, Berenson, and Downey (2013) found that negative emotion differentiation (NED) protected against rumination and nonsuicidal self-injury in borderline personality disorder. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this protective effect would extend to other populations and behaviors. Therefore, the present investigation sought to replicate and extend Zaki et al.'s (2013) findings in the context of SAD. In two studies, we examined if NED would moderate the positive association between rumination and frequency of social avoidance. Study 1 involved 29 individuals who met criteria for SAD with or without co-occurring major depressive episode, while Study 2 involved a nonclinical sample of 190 college students. All participants completed a measure of rumination and an experience-sampling diary which provided indices of NED and social avoidance. The results from both studies were unanimous: NED significantly moderated the relationship between rumination and social avoidance such that the positive association between rumination and social avoidance was significant for low but not moderate to high NED. Overall, the findings provide a conceptual replication of Zaki et al. (2013) and further evidence for the protective effects of NED against the maladaptive behavioral consequences of rumination across populations.

摘要

反刍思维被认为在情感障碍(如社交焦虑症)中起着核心作用。过去的研究表明,反刍往往会加剧负面情绪,增加采取适应不良应对行为的风险(例如,避免社交活动)。然而,对于如何有效地防止反刍的负面后果,人们知之甚少。此前,Zaki、Coifman、Rafaeli、Berenson 和 Downey(2013)发现,负性情绪分化(NED)可以预防边缘型人格障碍患者的反刍和非自杀性自伤。然而,目前尚不清楚这种保护作用是否会扩展到其他人群和行为。因此,本研究旨在复制和扩展 Zaki 等人(2013)在社交焦虑症背景下的发现。在两项研究中,我们考察了 NED 是否会调节反刍与社交回避频率之间的正相关关系。研究 1 涉及 29 名符合社交焦虑症标准且伴有或不伴有共病重性抑郁发作的个体,而研究 2 涉及 190 名非临床大学生样本。所有参与者都完成了反刍和体验抽样日记的测量,该日记提供了 NED 和社交回避的指标。两项研究的结果一致:NED 显著调节了反刍与社交回避之间的关系,即反刍与社交回避之间的正相关关系在 NED 较低而非中等至较高时是显著的。总的来说,这些发现复制了 Zaki 等人(2013)的结果,并进一步证明了 NED 对反刍的适应不良行为后果的保护作用在不同人群中是普遍存在的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验