• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A neuropathic pain scale is effective in identifying neuropathic pain.神经病理性疼痛量表在识别神经病理性疼痛方面很有效。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2094-2102. doi: 10.62347/BXRB6015. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation analysis of Polish version of Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire - Short Form (NPQ-SF-PL) and assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.波兰版神经病理性疼痛问卷简表(NPQ-SF-PL)的效度分析及慢性神经病理性疼痛患者生活质量评估
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2025;59(1):33-40. doi: 10.5603/pjnns.101185. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
3
Linguistic adaptation, validation and comparison of 3 routinely used neuropathic pain questionnaires.3 种常用神经性疼痛问卷的语言适应性、验证和比较。
Pain Physician. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):179-86.
4
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Polish version of Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ-PL) and its comparisons with different questionnaires.波兰版神经性疼痛问卷(NPQ-PL)的翻译与跨文化调适及其与不同问卷的比较。
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2024;58(1):66-74. doi: 10.5603/pjnns.96769. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
5
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the neuropathic pain questionnaire.波斯语版神经性疼痛问卷的心理测量特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(20):6065-6069. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1955301. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Validation of Complete Hindi Version of Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire for Assessment of Neuropathic Pain.用于评估神经性疼痛的《神经病理性疼痛4问卷》印地语完整版的验证
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):257-263. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_340_20. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
7
Development and validation of Arabic version of the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire-Short Form.《神经病理性疼痛问卷简表》阿拉伯语版本的编制与验证
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S53-S62. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_86_17.
8
Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions) questionnaire for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes associated to a neuropathic or somatic component.用于鉴别与神经病理性或躯体性成分相关疼痛综合征的西班牙文版DN4(神经病理性疼痛4个问题)问卷的效度和信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Dec 4;5:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-66.
9
Psychometric and accuracy comparison of three commonly used questionnaires for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain.三种常用神经病理性疼痛诊断问卷的心理测量学及准确性比较
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Oct-Dec;15(4):409-418. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_352_21. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Validity and reliability of the Arabic adapted version of the DN4 questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) for differential diagnosis of pain syndromes with a neuropathic or somatic component.阿拉伯语适应版 DN4 问卷(DN4 问卷,即 4 个问题神经性疼痛问卷)用于鉴别诊断具有神经性或躯体性成分的疼痛综合征的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Pract. 2011 Mar-Apr;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2010.00399.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation analysis of Polish version of Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire - Short Form (NPQ-SF-PL) and assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.波兰版神经病理性疼痛问卷简表(NPQ-SF-PL)的效度分析及慢性神经病理性疼痛患者生活质量评估
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2025;59(1):33-40. doi: 10.5603/pjnns.101185. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.神经病理性疼痛的诊断与治疗
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Dec 13;121(25):825-832. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0215.
3
Central neuropathic pain.中枢神经性疼痛。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023 Dec 21;9(1):73. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00484-9.
4
A validation study of the Cantonese Chinese version of short form McGill pain questionnaire 2 in Cantonese-speaking patients with chronic pain in Hong Kong.中文版简短 McGill 疼痛问卷 2 在香港讲粤语的慢性疼痛患者中的验证研究。
Pain Pract. 2024 Mar;24(3):449-457. doi: 10.1111/papr.13319. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Spinal Cord Injury Pain Instrument in patients with spinal cord injury in mainland China.中国大陆脊髓损伤患者脊髓损伤疼痛评估工具简化中文版的信度和效度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(18):4295-4299. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2261377. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Preliminary construct validity of patient-reported outcomes to assess chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease.评估成人镰状细胞病慢性疼痛的患者报告结局的初步构建效度。
Blood Adv. 2023 Jul 25;7(14):3658-3665. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023009707.
7
Pain, paresthesia, and the rotator cuff: the prevalence and magnitude of shoulder pain and hand numbness and tingling before and after rotator cuff repair.疼痛、感觉异常与肩袖:肩袖修复术前及术后肩部疼痛和手部麻木与刺痛的患病率及严重程度
JSES Int. 2022 May 14;6(4):615-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.010. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Clinical Observation of MRI Image in Floating Needle Therapy for Cervical Spondylosis of Cervical Type.颈椎病浮针疗法的 MRI 影像学临床观察。
Scanning. 2022 May 24;2022:1340192. doi: 10.1155/2022/1340192. eCollection 2022.
9
The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update.脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛康复管理的 CanPain SCI 临床实践指南:2021 更新版。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jun;60(6):548-566. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00744-z. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
10
Psychometric and accuracy comparison of three commonly used questionnaires for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain.三种常用神经病理性疼痛诊断问卷的心理测量学及准确性比较
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Oct-Dec;15(4):409-418. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_352_21. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

神经病理性疼痛量表在识别神经病理性疼痛方面很有效。

A neuropathic pain scale is effective in identifying neuropathic pain.

作者信息

Zhou Jianying, Yao Xihu, Zhao Jie, Li Jinhuang

机构信息

Department of Pain, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian (Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University) Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.

Department of Pathology, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian (Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University) Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2025 Mar 15;17(3):2094-2102. doi: 10.62347/BXRB6015. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.62347/BXRB6015
PMID:40226007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11982898/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application value of a Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) in screening for neuropathic pain (NP).

METHODS

Using a prospective study approach, patients with chronic pain treated and hospitalized in Quanzhou First Hospital between September 2020 and December 2023 were chosen as study subjects. Participants were screened using NPQ and then divided into a neuropathic pain group (NP group) and a non-neuropathic pain group (NNP group) based on NPQ's results. The baseline demographic data and disease causes were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Guttman split-half coefficient to assess internal consistency. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of of 121 patients were included, with 61 cases in the NP group and 60 cases in NNP group. There were no substantial differences between the NP group and the NNP group in terms of age, gender, education level, payment method of medical treatment, pain duration, average pain duration, or level of pain (all > 0.05). The NP group had a substantially higher NPQ score (8.67±1.21) than the NNP group (6.31±1.34) ( < 0.05). The primary causes of NP in the NP group were postherpetic neuralgia (26.23%), diabetic neuropathy (21.31%), and central post-stroke pain (18.03%). The NPQ demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.843 and a Guttman split-half coefficient of 0.822. The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.907 (95% CI, 0.853-0.961), with a sensitivity of 86.90%, specificity of 78.30%, PPV of 80.30%, and NPV of 85.45%.

CONCLUSION

NPQ is a reliable and effective tool for identifying neuropathic pain. Its high sensitivity and specificity, coupled with strong diagnostic performance, suggest that it can be used as a screening tool for neuropathic pain.

摘要

目的

探讨神经病理性疼痛问卷(NPQ)在筛查神经病理性疼痛(NP)中的应用价值。

方法

采用前瞻性研究方法,选取2020年9月至2023年12月在泉州市第一医院治疗并住院的慢性疼痛患者作为研究对象。使用NPQ对参与者进行筛查,然后根据NPQ结果将其分为神经病理性疼痛组(NP组)和非神经病理性疼痛组(NNP组)。使用Cronbach's α系数和古特曼折半系数评估基线人口统计学数据和疾病病因的内部一致性。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并评估曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

共纳入121例患者,NP组61例,NNP组60例。NP组和NNP组在年龄、性别、教育水平、医疗支付方式、疼痛持续时间、平均疼痛持续时间或疼痛程度方面均无显著差异(均>0.05)。NP组的NPQ评分(8.67±1.21)显著高于NNP组(6.31±1.34)(<0.05)。NP组中NP的主要病因是带状疱疹后神经痛(26.23%)、糖尿病性神经病变(21.31%)和中风后中枢性疼痛(18.03%)。NPQ显示出很强的可靠性,Cronbach's α系数为0.843,古特曼折半系数为0.822。ROC分析显示AUC为0.907(95%CI,0.853 - 0.961),敏感性为86.90%,特异性为78.30%,PPV为80.30%,NPV为85.45%。

结论

NPQ是识别神经病理性疼痛的可靠有效工具。其高敏感性和特异性,以及较强的诊断性能,表明它可作为神经病理性疼痛的筛查工具。