Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激对慢性踝关节不稳患者脑活动及临床结局的平衡训练无附加效应:一项随机对照试验

No additive effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance exercises for brain activity and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Beyraghi Zivar, Khanmohammadi Roya

机构信息

Physical Therapy Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).

出版信息

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Apr 10;11(2):e002401. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002401. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study explored whether adding transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to balance exercises enhances preparatory brain activity and clinical outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability.

METHODS

30 participants were randomised into two groups: balance exercises with real tDCS and balance exercises with sham tDCS. Neurophysiological measures, including late contingent negative variation (CNV) amplitude, peak amplitude and peak time, served as primary outcomes, while biomechanical (anticipatory postural adjustment duration) and clinical (dynamic balance and perceived ankle instability) outcomes were secondary. Both groups completed 12 sessions, each lasting 60 min.

RESULTS

The results revealed no significant group-by-time interaction for late CNV amplitude, CNV peak amplitude, perceived ankle instability scores or dynamic balance, indicating no added benefit of real tDCS over sham. However, both groups demonstrated significant post-treatment improvements in late CNV amplitude (C3, Cz, C4: p≤0.017, η=0.177-0.276) and CNV peak amplitude at the C3 electrode (p=0.026, η=0.158), reflecting enhanced preparatory brain activity. Similarly, dynamic balance improved significantly in the anterior, posterior-medial and posterior-lateral directions (p≤0.010, η=0.204-0.350) and perceived ankle instability scores increased notably, indicating reduced instability (p<0.001, η=0.391), regardless of the tDCS condition. Furthermore, significant correlations (r=0.381-0.553) were observed between treatment-induced changes in neurophysiological variables and biomechanical and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although tDCS did not show a distinct advantage, the improvements in neurophysiological and clinical outcomes suggest that balance exercises effectively target central mechanisms. Additionally, relationships were found between enhancements in neurophysiological outcomes and other measures, emphasising the pivotal role of central mechanisms in driving these positive effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT20210604051488N1.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了在慢性踝关节不稳患者中,在平衡训练中加入经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否能增强大脑的准备活动及改善临床疗效。

方法

30名参与者被随机分为两组:接受真实tDCS的平衡训练组和接受假tDCS的平衡训练组。神经生理学指标,包括晚期关联负变(CNV)幅度、峰值幅度和峰值时间,作为主要结果,而生物力学指标(预期姿势调整持续时间)和临床指标(动态平衡和踝关节不稳感知)作为次要结果。两组均完成12节训练课程,每节持续60分钟。

结果

结果显示,在晚期CNV幅度、CNV峰值幅度、踝关节不稳感知评分或动态平衡方面,未发现显著的组×时间交互作用,表明真实tDCS相较于假tDCS并无额外益处。然而,两组在晚期CNV幅度(C3、Cz、C4:p≤0.017,η=0.177 - 0.276)和C3电极处的CNV峰值幅度(p = 0.026,η = 0.158)上均显示出治疗后有显著改善,反映出大脑准备活动增强。同样,无论tDCS条件如何,动态平衡在前、后内侧和后外侧方向均有显著改善(p≤0.010,η = 0.204 - 0.350),踝关节不稳感知评分显著增加,表明不稳程度降低(p < 0.001,η = 0.391)。此外,在神经生理学变量的治疗诱导变化与生物力学和临床结果之间观察到显著相关性(r = 0.381 - 0.553)。

结论

尽管tDCS未显示出明显优势,但神经生理学和临床结果的改善表明平衡训练有效地针对了中枢机制。此外,还发现神经生理学结果的增强与其他指标之间存在关联,强调了中枢机制在驱动这些积极效果中的关键作用。

试验注册号

IRCT20210604051488N1。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2038/11987147/d81ae79a1cca/bmjsem-11-2-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验