Suppr超能文献

自然与社会中的不平等。

Inequality in nature and society.

机构信息

Environmental Science Department, Wageningen University, 6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands

Department of History, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 12;114(50):13154-13157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706412114. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Abstract

Most societies are economically dominated by a small elite, and similarly, natural communities are typically dominated by a small fraction of the species. Here we reveal a strong similarity between patterns of inequality in nature and society, hinting at fundamental unifying mechanisms. We show that chance alone will drive 1% or less of the community to dominate 50% of all resources in situations where gains and losses are multiplicative, as in returns on assets or growth rates of populations. Key mechanisms that counteract such hyperdominance include natural enemies in nature and wealth-equalizing institutions in society. However, historical research of European developments over the past millennium suggests that such institutions become ineffective in times of societal upscaling. A corollary is that in a globalizing world, wealth will inevitably be appropriated by a very small fraction of the population unless effective wealth-equalizing institutions emerge at the global level.

摘要

大多数社会都是由一小部分精英在经济上主导的,类似地,自然群落通常也由物种中的一小部分主导。在这里,我们揭示了自然界和社会中不平等模式之间的强烈相似性,暗示了基本的统一机制。我们表明,在收益和损失是相乘的情况下(例如资产回报或人口增长率),仅靠机会就会导致社区中 1%或更少的部分占据 50%的全部资源。在这种情况下,对抗这种超主导地位的关键机制包括自然界中的天敌和社会中的财富均等化机构。然而,对过去一千年欧洲发展的历史研究表明,在社会规模扩大的时期,这些机构会变得无效。其推论是,在全球化的世界中,除非在全球层面出现有效的财富均等化机构,否则财富将不可避免地被人口中的一小部分人占有。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/662f/5740652/4bda073a31e9/pnas.1706412114fig01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验