J F Ansley, M Bernal-Sprekelsen, H F Butehorn, S Todorov, V Tzvetkov, F Douglis, K Georgiev, F Moreira da Silva
Carolina ENT Clinic (Centri Inc.), Orangeburg, Hickory, SC, USA.
University of Barcelona Medical School, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251330629. doi: 10.1177/19160216251330629. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
ImportanceThere is no antifungal otic drug for the treatment of otomycosis approved in the United States. Some current clotrimazole formulations in the market are used off-label.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of clotrimazole 1% otic solution compared to placebo in treating otomycosis in adults.DesignTwo independent twin multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, controlled clinical trials with identical designs were conducted from February 2020 to October 2021.SettingFifty-three sites located in the United States, Mexico, and Europe.ParticipantsAdults with uncomplicated otomycosis presented with symptoms, debris, and drainage clinically consistent with fungal infection.InterventionPatients received clotrimazole or placebo twice daily for 14 days and were evaluated on visit 1 (day 1), visit 2 (day 8-10), visit 3 (day 15), and follow-up visit 4 (day 24-26).Main Outcome MeasuresAt each visit, pruritus, otalgia, otorrhea, and ear fullness were assessed. Ear exudate was taken for a mycological and microbiological evaluation at baseline and, if present, at subsequent visits. The primary endpoint was a therapeutic cure (mycological and clinical) at visit 4 in the randomized population with positive fungal culture at baseline [mycological intent-to-treat (MITT)].ResultsThree hundred ninety-three patients received study medication (261 clotrimazole and 132 placebo). Efficacy data from the 228 patients (157 clotrimazole and 71 placebo) included in the MITT were analyzed. The clotrimazole group achieved a higher proportion for the primary endpoint than those with the placebo group (68.2% vs 25.4%; < .0001), with a 42.8 difference in response rate (95% confidence interval: 30.3, 55.3). The treatment was safe and well tolerated, with 2.7% of related adverse events in the clotrimazole versus 1.5% in the placebo group.ConclusionsClotrimazole 1% otic solution has demonstrated its superiority over the placebo in each study and the pooled analysis. These are the results of the first international, multicenter clinical trials in which clotrimazole 1% otic solution demonstrates efficacy for the treatment of otomycosis.
重要性
在美国,尚无获批用于治疗耳霉菌病的抗真菌耳用药物。目前市场上的一些克霉唑制剂属于超说明书用药。
目的
评估1%克霉唑耳用溶液与安慰剂相比,治疗成人耳霉菌病的疗效和安全性。
设计
2020年2月至2021年10月进行了两项独立的双中心、随机(2:1)、双盲、对照临床试验,设计相同。
地点
位于美国、墨西哥和欧洲的53个地点。
参与者
患有单纯性耳霉菌病的成年人,临床表现为症状、碎屑和引流物,与真菌感染相符。
干预措施
患者每天接受两次克霉唑或安慰剂治疗,持续14天,并在第1次就诊(第1天)、第2次就诊(第8 - 10天)、第3次就诊(第15天)和随访第4次就诊(第24 - 26天)时进行评估。
主要观察指标
每次就诊时,评估瘙痒、耳痛、耳漏和耳闷。在基线时采集耳渗出液进行真菌学和微生物学评估,如有渗出液,在后续就诊时也进行采集。主要终点是在基线真菌培养阳性的随机分组人群中,第4次就诊时达到治疗性治愈(真菌学和临床)[真菌学意向性治疗(MITT)]。
结果
393例患者接受了研究药物治疗(261例接受克霉唑,132例接受安慰剂)。对MITT中纳入的228例患者(157例接受克霉唑,71例接受安慰剂)的疗效数据进行了分析。克霉唑组达到主要终点的比例高于安慰剂组(68.2%对25.4%;<0.0001),反应率差异为42.8%(95%置信区间:30.3,55.3)。治疗安全且耐受性良好,克霉唑组相关不良事件发生率为2.7%,而安慰剂组为1.5%。
结论
在每项研究和汇总分析中,1%克霉唑耳用溶液均显示出优于安慰剂的效果。这些是1%克霉唑耳用溶液治疗耳霉菌病疗效的首次国际多中心临床试验结果。