Radebe Silindokuhle Sanele, Breukelman Gerrit Jan, Joubert Anné S, Millard Lourens
Department of Human Movement Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa.
Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;22(3):344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030344.
Physical inactivity among university students remains a global health concern, especially in semi-rural settings where unique barriers such as limited facilities, cultural norms, and inadequate transportation persist. This study aimed to identify the primary motivations and barriers to physical activity participation among students at a semi-rural university, providing insights for tailored interventions. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used. In the quantitative phase, 414 questionnaires were distributed across four faculties, with 328 completed responses analysed using -tests and factor analysis. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 23 students, analysed through conventional content analysis. The quantitative findings revealed key motivators for physical activity, which included enjoyment (mean = 4.51, < 0.001), social interaction (mean = 3.99, < 0.001), and health benefits (mean = 3.27, = 0.001). However, for barriers, heavy academic workload reached statistical significance (mean = 3.88, < 0.001). In contrast, qualitative data uncovered additional barriers such as insufficient facilities and poor communication, which were not captured in the quantitative phase. Factor analysis identified four constructs for motivations (e.g., coaching, social, health, enjoyment) and barriers (e.g., club processes, excuses, external factors, lack of interest). Qualitative data corroborated these findings, highlighting issues such as insufficient visibility of physical activity programs, time barriers, and inconsistent coaching quality. This study underscores the importance of addressing structural barriers, such as upgrading facilities, improving communication strategies, and enhancing coaching quality, to increase physical activity participation. By implementing strategic interventions, universities can foster inclusive environments that better support students' well-being and engagement, ultimately promoting healthier lifestyles among university populations.
大学生缺乏体育锻炼仍是一个全球健康问题,尤其是在半农村地区,那里存在设施有限、文化规范和交通不便等独特障碍。本研究旨在确定半农村地区一所大学学生参与体育活动的主要动机和障碍,为量身定制的干预措施提供见解。采用了混合方法解释性序列设计。在定量阶段,向四个学院分发了414份问卷,对328份完整回复进行了t检验和因子分析。定性阶段包括对23名学生进行半结构化访谈,并通过常规内容分析进行分析。定量研究结果揭示了体育活动的关键动机,包括享受(均值 = 4.51,p < 0.001)、社交互动(均值 = 3.99,p < 0.001)和健康益处(均值 = 3.27,p = )。然而,对于障碍而言,繁重的学业负担具有统计学意义(均值 = 3.88,p < 0.001)。相比之下,定性数据发现了设施不足和沟通不畅等其他障碍,这些在定量阶段未被发现。因子分析确定了四个动机结构(如指导、社交、健康、享受)和障碍结构(如俱乐部流程、借口、外部因素、缺乏兴趣)。定性数据证实了这些发现,突出了体育活动项目可见度不足、时间障碍和指导质量不一致等问题。本研究强调了解决结构性障碍的重要性,如升级设施、改进沟通策略和提高指导质量,以增加体育活动参与度。通过实施战略干预措施,大学可以营造更具包容性的环境,更好地支持学生的福祉和参与度,最终在大学生群体中促进更健康的生活方式。