Wang Siwen, Menor Anthony, Chibnik Lori B, Kang Jae H, Vyas Chirag M, Blacker Deborah L, Kubzansky Laura D, Koenen Karestan C, Roberts Andrea L
Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255532. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5532.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with risk factors for cognitive decline, such as bereavement and SARS-CoV-2 infection.
To examine whether the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related exposures are associated with cognitive function among middle-aged women.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed data from the Nurses' Health Study II, an ongoing study of registered nurses in the US. The present study focused on women aged 51 to 76 years who completed 2 to 8 objective cognitive assessments both prior to (October 1, 2014, to February 29, 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2022). Statistical analyses were performed from January 2023 to January 2025.
COVID-19 pandemic.
Two standardized (ie, z-scored) composite cognitive scores (psychomotor speed and attention, learning and working memory) and a global score constituted the primary outcomes. Higher scores indicated better cognitive function. Cognitive function was assessed using the Cogstate Brief Battery, a computer-administered cognitive test battery. Participants completed cognitive assessments every 6 to 12 months.
A total of 5191 women (mean [SD] age at first cognitive assessment, 63.0 [4.8] years) completed both prepandemic and during-pandemic measures, contributing 23 678 cognitive assessments. After adjustment for age at cognitive assessment, educational level for both participants and their parents, cognitive test practice effects, and comorbidities (eg, diabetes, hypertension), no difference in cognitive function was observed between assessments taken during vs before the pandemic (psychomotor speed and attention: β = -0.01 SD [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.02 SD]; learning and working memory: β = 0.00 SD [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03 SD]; global score: β = 0.00 SD [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.02 SD]). Among 4456 participants who responded to the COVID-19 substudy (ie, surveys about pandemic-related events), those with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (164 [3.7%]) or post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC; 62 [1.4%]), at a median (IQR) 20.0 (18.5-22.1) months after initial infection, had reduced cognitive function compared with women without infection or PCC; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance, and the wide CIs suggested considerable uncertainty.
This cohort study of middle-aged women found that the COVID-19 pandemic and pandemic-related events were not associated with cognitive decline up to 2.5 years after the onset of the pandemic. Future studies are needed to examine the long-term implications of SARS-CoV-2 infection and PCC for cognitive function.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行与认知能力下降的风险因素有关,如丧亲之痛和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染。
研究COVID-19大流行及与大流行相关的暴露因素是否与中年女性的认知功能有关。
设计、背景和参与者:这项队列研究分析了护士健康研究II的数据,该研究是一项针对美国注册护士的正在进行的研究。本研究聚焦于年龄在51至76岁之间的女性,她们在COVID-19大流行之前(2014年10月1日至2020年2月29日)和大流行期间(2020年3月1日至2022年9月30日)完成了2至8次客观认知评估。统计分析于2023年1月至2025年1月进行。
COVID-19大流行。
两个标准化(即z评分)的综合认知分数(心理运动速度和注意力、学习和工作记忆)以及一个总体分数构成主要结局。分数越高表明认知功能越好。认知功能使用Cogstate简短电池组进行评估,这是一种计算机辅助的认知测试电池组。参与者每6至12个月完成一次认知评估。
共有5191名女性(首次认知评估时的平均[标准差]年龄为63.0[4.8]岁)完成了大流行前和大流行期间的测量,共进行了23678次认知评估。在对认知评估时的年龄、参与者及其父母的教育水平、认知测试练习效应和合并症(如糖尿病、高血压)进行调整后,未观察到大流行期间与大流行之前的评估在认知功能上存在差异(心理运动速度和注意力:β=-0.01标准差[95%置信区间,-0.05至0.02标准差];学习和工作记忆:β=0.00标准差[95%置信区间,-0.03至0.03标准差];总体分数:β=0.00标准差[95%置信区间,-0.03至0.02标准差])。在4456名回应COVID-19子研究(即关于与大流行相关事件的调查)的参与者中,有严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染史(164例[3.7%])或感染COVID-19后状况(PCC;62例[1.4%])的参与者,在初次感染后的中位(四分位间距)20.0(18.5 - 22.1)个月时,与未感染或无PCC的女性相比,认知功能有所下降;然而,这些差异未达到统计学显著性,且宽泛的置信区间表明存在相当大的不确定性。
这项针对中年女性的队列研究发现,在COVID-19大流行开始后的2.5年内,该大流行及与大流行相关的事件与认知能力下降无关。需要进一步研究来探讨严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2感染和PCC对认知功能的长期影响。