Cheetham Nathan J, Penfold Rose, Giunchiglia Valentina, Bowyer Vicky, Sudre Carole H, Canas Liane S, Deng Jie, Murray Benjamin, Kerfoot Eric, Antonelli Michela, Rjoob Khaled, Molteni Erika, Österdahl Marc F, Harvey Nicholas R, Trender William R, Malim Michael H, Doores Katie J, Hellyer Peter J, Modat Marc, Hammers Alexander, Ourselin Sebastien, Duncan Emma L, Hampshire Adam, Steves Claire J
Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, Ageing and Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 21;62:102086. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102086. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Cognitive impairment has been reported after many types of infection, including SARS-CoV-2. Whether deficits following SARS-CoV-2 improve over time is unclear. Studies to date have focused on hospitalised individuals with up to a year follow-up. The presence, magnitude, persistence and correlations of effects in community-based cases remain relatively unexplored.
Cognitive performance (working memory, attention, reasoning, motor control) was assessed in a prospective cohort study of participants from the United Kingdom COVID Symptom Study Biobank between July 12, 2021 and August 27, 2021 (Round 1), and between April 28, 2022 and June 21, 2022 (Round 2). Participants, recruited from the COVID Symptom Study smartphone app, comprised individuals with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection and varying symptom duration. Effects of COVID-19 exposures on cognitive accuracy and reaction time scores were estimated using multivariable ordinary least squares linear regression models weighted for inverse probability of participation, adjusting for potential confounders and mediators. The role of ongoing symptoms after COVID-19 infection was examined stratifying for self-perceived recovery. Longitudinal analysis assessed change in cognitive performance between rounds.
3335 individuals completed Round 1, of whom 1768 also completed Round 2. At Round 1, individuals with previous positive SARS-CoV-2 tests had lower cognitive accuracy (N = 1737, β = -0.14 standard deviations, SDs, 95% confidence intervals, CI: -0.21, -0.07) than negative controls. Deficits were largest for positive individuals with ≥12 weeks of symptoms (N = 495, β = -0.22 SDs, 95% CI: -0.35, -0.09). Effects were comparable to hospital presentation during illness (N = 281, β = -0.31 SDs, 95% CI: -0.44, -0.18), and 10 years age difference (60-70 years vs. 50-60 years, β = -0.21 SDs, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.13) in the whole study population. Stratification by self-reported recovery revealed that deficits were only detectable in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals who did not feel recovered from COVID-19, whereas individuals who reported full recovery showed no deficits. Longitudinal analysis showed no evidence of cognitive change over time, suggesting that cognitive deficits for affected individuals persisted at almost 2 years since initial infection.
Cognitive deficits following SARS-CoV-2 infection were detectable nearly two years post infection, and largest for individuals with longer symptom durations, ongoing symptoms, and/or more severe infection. However, no such deficits were detected in individuals who reported full recovery from COVID-19. Further work is needed to monitor and develop understanding of recovery mechanisms for those with ongoing symptoms.
Chronic Disease Research Foundation, Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Alzheimer's Society, European Union, COVID-19 Driver Relief Fund, French National Research Agency.
包括新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)在内的多种感染后均有认知障碍的报道。SARS-CoV-2感染后的认知缺陷是否会随时间改善尚不清楚。迄今为止的研究主要集中在住院患者,随访时间长达一年。社区病例中的影响的存在、程度、持续性及相关性仍相对未被探索。
在一项前瞻性队列研究中,对2021年7月12日至2021年8月27日(第一轮)以及2022年4月28日至2022年6月21日(第二轮)期间来自英国新冠症状研究生物样本库的参与者的认知表现(工作记忆、注意力、推理、运动控制)进行评估。从新冠症状研究智能手机应用程序招募的参与者包括有和没有SARS-CoV-2感染以及症状持续时间不同的个体。使用多变量普通最小二乘线性回归模型估计新冠病毒暴露对认知准确性和反应时间分数的影响,并对参与的逆概率进行加权,同时调整潜在的混杂因素和中介因素。通过对自我感知恢复情况进行分层,研究了新冠病毒感染后持续症状的作用。纵向分析评估了两轮之间认知表现的变化。
3335名个体完成了第一轮,其中1768名也完成了第二轮。在第一轮时,既往SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性的个体的认知准确性(N = 1737,β = -0.14标准差,95%置信区间,CI:-0.21,-0.07)低于阴性对照。症状持续≥12周的阳性个体的缺陷最大(N = 495,β = -0.22标准差,95% CI:-0.35, -0.09)。这些影响与患病期间住院情况(N = 281,β = -0.31标准差,95% CI:-0.44, -0.18)以及整个研究人群中10岁年龄差异(60 - 70岁 vs. 50 - 60岁,β = -0.21标准差,95% CI:-0.30, -0.13)相当。根据自我报告的恢复情况进行分层显示,只有未从新冠病毒感染中恢复的SARS-CoV-2阳性个体存在缺陷,而报告完全恢复的个体没有缺陷。纵向分析没有显示出随时间认知变化的证据,这表明受影响个体的认知缺陷在初次感染后近2年仍持续存在。
SARS-CoV-2感染后的认知缺陷在感染后近2年可检测到,症状持续时间较长、有持续症状和/或感染较严重的个体缺陷最大。然而,从新冠病毒感染中报告完全恢复的个体未检测到此类缺陷。需要进一步开展工作来监测并加深对有持续症状者恢复机制的理解。
慢性病研究基金会、惠康信托基金会(英国)、国家卫生与保健研究所(英国)、医学研究理事会(英国)、英国心脏基金会、阿尔茨海默病协会(英国)、欧盟、新冠疫情司机救助基金、法国国家研究机构。