Ross Jonathan D C, Wilson Janet, Workowski Kimberly A, Taylor Stephanie N, Lewis David A, Gatsi Sally, Flight William, Scangarella-Oman Nicole E, Jakielaszek Charles, Lythgoe Dan, Powell Marcy, Janmohamed Salim, Absalon Judith, Perry Caroline
Department of Sexual Health and HIV, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Lancet. 2025 May 3;405(10489):1608-1620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00628-2. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
Gepotidacin, a first-in-class, bactericidal, triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial that inhibits bacterial DNA replication, was shown to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea.
EAGLE-1 (NCT04010539) was a phase 3, open-label, sponsor-blinded, multicentre, non-inferiority study evaluating oral gepotidacin (two 3000 mg doses administered 10-12 h apart) compared with 500 mg intramuscular ceftriaxone plus 1 g oral azithromycin for the treatment of gonorrhoea. Eligible participants were aged 12 years and older, had a bodyweight over 45 kg, and had suspected uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (including mucopurulent discharge), a positive laboratory test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or both. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to each treatment group, stratified by sex (original urogenital anatomy at birth) and sexual orientation (men who have sex with men [MSM], men who have sex with women [MSW], and female) in combination, and age group (age <18 years, ≥18 to 65 years, or >65 years). The primary efficacy endpoint was microbiological success, defined as culture-confirmed bacterial eradication of N gonorrhoeae from the urogenital body site at test-of-cure (days 4-8). The non-inferiority margin was prespecified at -10%. The primary outcome was assessed in the microbiological intention-to-treat (micro-ITT) population, all participants randomly allocated to a study treatment who received at least one dose of their study treatment and had confirmed ceftriaxone-susceptible N gonorrhoeae isolated from the baseline culture of their urogenital specimen. The safety population comprised all participants who received one or more doses of any study treatment.
Between Oct 21, 2019, and Oct 10, 2023, 628 participants were randomly allocated (314 allocated to each treatment group). Overall, 39 (6%) of 628 participants discontinued the study prematurely (20 in the gepotidacin group and 19 in the ceftriaxone plus azithromycin group), with the primary reason being lost to follow-up. The micro-ITT population included 406 participants (202 in the gepotidacin group and 204 in the ceftriaxone plus azithromycin group). Most participants in the micro-ITT population were male (372 [92%] vs 34 [8%] female), and there was a higher percentage of participants who were MSM (290 [71%]) compared with participants who were MSW (82 [20%]). Participants were predominantly White (299 [74%]) or Black or African American (61 [15%]), with 70 (17%) identifying as Hispanic or Latino. Results of the primary analysis of microbiological response at test-of-cure demonstrated microbiological success rates of 92·6% (187 of 202 [95% CI 88·0 to 95·8]) in the gepotidacin group and 91·2% (186 of 204 [86·4 to 94·7]) in the ceftriaxone plus azithromycin group (adjusted treatment difference -0·1% [95% CI -5·6 to 5·5]). Gepotidacin was non-inferior to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin. No bacterial persistence of urogenital N gonorrhoeae was observed at test-of-cure for either group. The gepotidacin group had higher rates of adverse events and drug-related adverse events, mainly due to gastrointestinal adverse events, and almost all were mild or moderate. No treatment-related severe or serious adverse events occurred in either group.
Gepotidacin demonstrated non-inferiority to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for urogenital N gonorrhoeae, with no new safety concerns, offering a novel oral treatment option for uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea.
GSK and federal funds from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
格帕沙星是一种新型的具有杀菌作用的三氮杂蒽类抗菌药物,可抑制细菌DNA复制,已被证明在治疗单纯性尿路感染方面有效且耐受性良好。我们评估了格帕沙星治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病的疗效和安全性。
EAGLE-1(NCT04010539)是一项3期、开放标签、申办方设盲、多中心、非劣效性研究,比较口服格帕沙星(3000 mg分两次给药,间隔10 - 12小时)与500 mg肌内注射头孢曲松加1 g口服阿奇霉素治疗淋病的效果。符合条件的参与者年龄在12岁及以上,体重超过45 kg,疑似患有单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病(包括黏液脓性分泌物),淋病奈瑟菌实验室检测呈阳性,或两者皆有。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到各治疗组,按性别(出生时的原始泌尿生殖解剖结构)和性取向(男男性行为者[MSM]、男女性行为者[MSW]和女性)组合以及年龄组(年龄<18岁、≥18至65岁或>65岁)进行分层。主要疗效终点是微生物学成功,定义为在治愈测试(第4 - 8天)时从泌尿生殖部位经培养确认淋病奈瑟菌被根除。非劣效性界值预先设定为-10%。主要结局在微生物学意向性治疗(micro-ITT)人群中进行评估,所有随机分配到研究治疗组并接受至少一剂研究治疗且泌尿生殖标本基线培养中分离出对头孢曲松敏感的淋病奈瑟菌的参与者。安全人群包括所有接受一剂或多剂任何研究治疗的参与者。
在2019年10月21日至2023年10月10日期间,628名参与者被随机分配(每组314名)。总体而言,628名参与者中有39名(6%)提前终止研究(格帕沙星组20名,头孢曲松加阿奇霉素组19名),主要原因是失访。micro-ITT人群包括406名参与者(格帕沙星组202名,头孢曲松加阿奇霉素组204名)。micro-ITT人群中大多数参与者为男性(372名[92%]对34名[8%]女性),与MSW参与者(82名[20%])相比,MSM参与者的比例更高(290名[71%])。参与者主要为白人(299名[74%])或黑人或非裔美国人(61名[15%]),70名(17%)为西班牙裔或拉丁裔。治愈测试时微生物学反应的主要分析结果显示,格帕沙星组的微生物学成功率为92.6%(202名中的187名[95%CI 88.0至95.8]),头孢曲松加阿奇霉素组为91.2%(204名中的186名[86.4至94.7])(调整后的治疗差异为-0.1%[95%CI -5.6至5.5])。格帕沙星不劣于头孢曲松加阿奇霉素。两组在治愈测试时均未观察到泌尿生殖系统淋病奈瑟菌的细菌持续存在。格帕沙星组不良事件和药物相关不良事件的发生率较高,主要是由于胃肠道不良事件,且几乎所有事件均为轻度或中度。两组均未发生与治疗相关的严重或重大不良事件。
格帕沙星在治疗泌尿生殖系统淋病方面不劣于头孢曲松加阿奇霉素,且无新的安全问题,为单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病提供了一种新的口服治疗选择。
葛兰素史克公司以及助理部长办公室防备与应对司生物医学高级研究与发展局提供的联邦资金。