• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服格派沙星治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病(EAGLE-1):一项3期随机、开放标签、非劣效性、多中心研究。

Oral gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (EAGLE-1): a phase 3 randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre study.

作者信息

Ross Jonathan D C, Wilson Janet, Workowski Kimberly A, Taylor Stephanie N, Lewis David A, Gatsi Sally, Flight William, Scangarella-Oman Nicole E, Jakielaszek Charles, Lythgoe Dan, Powell Marcy, Janmohamed Salim, Absalon Judith, Perry Caroline

机构信息

Department of Sexual Health and HIV, Birmingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2025 May 3;405(10489):1608-1620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00628-2. Epub 2025 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00628-2
PMID:40245902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gepotidacin, a first-in-class, bactericidal, triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial that inhibits bacterial DNA replication, was shown to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea.

METHODS

EAGLE-1 (NCT04010539) was a phase 3, open-label, sponsor-blinded, multicentre, non-inferiority study evaluating oral gepotidacin (two 3000 mg doses administered 10-12 h apart) compared with 500 mg intramuscular ceftriaxone plus 1 g oral azithromycin for the treatment of gonorrhoea. Eligible participants were aged 12 years and older, had a bodyweight over 45 kg, and had suspected uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (including mucopurulent discharge), a positive laboratory test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, or both. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to each treatment group, stratified by sex (original urogenital anatomy at birth) and sexual orientation (men who have sex with men [MSM], men who have sex with women [MSW], and female) in combination, and age group (age <18 years, ≥18 to 65 years, or >65 years). The primary efficacy endpoint was microbiological success, defined as culture-confirmed bacterial eradication of N gonorrhoeae from the urogenital body site at test-of-cure (days 4-8). The non-inferiority margin was prespecified at -10%. The primary outcome was assessed in the microbiological intention-to-treat (micro-ITT) population, all participants randomly allocated to a study treatment who received at least one dose of their study treatment and had confirmed ceftriaxone-susceptible N gonorrhoeae isolated from the baseline culture of their urogenital specimen. The safety population comprised all participants who received one or more doses of any study treatment.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 21, 2019, and Oct 10, 2023, 628 participants were randomly allocated (314 allocated to each treatment group). Overall, 39 (6%) of 628 participants discontinued the study prematurely (20 in the gepotidacin group and 19 in the ceftriaxone plus azithromycin group), with the primary reason being lost to follow-up. The micro-ITT population included 406 participants (202 in the gepotidacin group and 204 in the ceftriaxone plus azithromycin group). Most participants in the micro-ITT population were male (372 [92%] vs 34 [8%] female), and there was a higher percentage of participants who were MSM (290 [71%]) compared with participants who were MSW (82 [20%]). Participants were predominantly White (299 [74%]) or Black or African American (61 [15%]), with 70 (17%) identifying as Hispanic or Latino. Results of the primary analysis of microbiological response at test-of-cure demonstrated microbiological success rates of 92·6% (187 of 202 [95% CI 88·0 to 95·8]) in the gepotidacin group and 91·2% (186 of 204 [86·4 to 94·7]) in the ceftriaxone plus azithromycin group (adjusted treatment difference -0·1% [95% CI -5·6 to 5·5]). Gepotidacin was non-inferior to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin. No bacterial persistence of urogenital N gonorrhoeae was observed at test-of-cure for either group. The gepotidacin group had higher rates of adverse events and drug-related adverse events, mainly due to gastrointestinal adverse events, and almost all were mild or moderate. No treatment-related severe or serious adverse events occurred in either group.

INTERPRETATION

Gepotidacin demonstrated non-inferiority to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for urogenital N gonorrhoeae, with no new safety concerns, offering a novel oral treatment option for uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea.

FUNDING

GSK and federal funds from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

摘要

背景

格帕沙星是一种新型的具有杀菌作用的三氮杂蒽类抗菌药物,可抑制细菌DNA复制,已被证明在治疗单纯性尿路感染方面有效且耐受性良好。我们评估了格帕沙星治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病的疗效和安全性。

方法

EAGLE-1(NCT04010539)是一项3期、开放标签、申办方设盲、多中心、非劣效性研究,比较口服格帕沙星(3000 mg分两次给药,间隔10 - 12小时)与500 mg肌内注射头孢曲松加1 g口服阿奇霉素治疗淋病的效果。符合条件的参与者年龄在12岁及以上,体重超过45 kg,疑似患有单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病(包括黏液脓性分泌物),淋病奈瑟菌实验室检测呈阳性,或两者皆有。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到各治疗组,按性别(出生时的原始泌尿生殖解剖结构)和性取向(男男性行为者[MSM]、男女性行为者[MSW]和女性)组合以及年龄组(年龄<18岁、≥18至65岁或>65岁)进行分层。主要疗效终点是微生物学成功,定义为在治愈测试(第4 - 8天)时从泌尿生殖部位经培养确认淋病奈瑟菌被根除。非劣效性界值预先设定为-10%。主要结局在微生物学意向性治疗(micro-ITT)人群中进行评估,所有随机分配到研究治疗组并接受至少一剂研究治疗且泌尿生殖标本基线培养中分离出对头孢曲松敏感的淋病奈瑟菌的参与者。安全人群包括所有接受一剂或多剂任何研究治疗的参与者。

结果

在2019年10月21日至2023年10月10日期间,628名参与者被随机分配(每组314名)。总体而言,628名参与者中有39名(6%)提前终止研究(格帕沙星组20名,头孢曲松加阿奇霉素组19名),主要原因是失访。micro-ITT人群包括406名参与者(格帕沙星组202名,头孢曲松加阿奇霉素组204名)。micro-ITT人群中大多数参与者为男性(372名[92%]对34名[8%]女性),与MSW参与者(82名[20%])相比,MSM参与者的比例更高(290名[71%])。参与者主要为白人(299名[74%])或黑人或非裔美国人(61名[15%]),70名(17%)为西班牙裔或拉丁裔。治愈测试时微生物学反应的主要分析结果显示,格帕沙星组的微生物学成功率为92.6%(202名中的187名[95%CI 88.0至95.8]),头孢曲松加阿奇霉素组为91.2%(204名中的186名[86.4至94.7])(调整后的治疗差异为-0.1%[95%CI -5.6至5.5])。格帕沙星不劣于头孢曲松加阿奇霉素。两组在治愈测试时均未观察到泌尿生殖系统淋病奈瑟菌的细菌持续存在。格帕沙星组不良事件和药物相关不良事件的发生率较高,主要是由于胃肠道不良事件,且几乎所有事件均为轻度或中度。两组均未发生与治疗相关的严重或重大不良事件。

解读

格帕沙星在治疗泌尿生殖系统淋病方面不劣于头孢曲松加阿奇霉素,且无新的安全问题,为单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病提供了一种新的口服治疗选择。

资助

葛兰素史克公司以及助理部长办公室防备与应对司生物医学高级研究与发展局提供的联邦资金。

相似文献

1
Oral gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (EAGLE-1): a phase 3 randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre study.口服格派沙星治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病(EAGLE-1):一项3期随机、开放标签、非劣效性、多中心研究。
Lancet. 2025 May 3;405(10489):1608-1620. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00628-2. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Oral gepotidacin versus nitrofurantoin in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3): two randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, non-inferiority trials.口服 gepotidacin 与硝基呋喃妥因治疗单纯性尿路感染患者(EAGLE-2 和 EAGLE-3):两项随机、对照、双盲、双模拟、3 期、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Feb 24;403(10428):741-755. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02196-7. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Solithromycin versus ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated genital gonorrhoea (SOLITAIRE-U): a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial.索利霉素与头孢曲松加阿奇霉素治疗单纯性生殖器淋病(SOLITAIRE-U):一项随机、3 期非劣效性试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;19(8):833-842. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30116-1. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
Gentamicin as an alternative to ceftriaxone in the treatment of gonorrhoea: the G-TOG non-inferiority RCT.庆大霉素替代头孢曲松治疗淋病:G-TOG 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(20):1-104. doi: 10.3310/hta23200.
5
Gepotidacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea: A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Single-Oral Dose Evaluation.格帕沙星治疗单纯泌尿生殖系统淋病:一项 2 期、随机、剂量范围、单次口服剂量评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 1;67(4):504-512. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy145.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Gepotidacin as Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea (EAGLE-1): Design of a Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 3 Study.格派沙星治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系统淋病的疗效和安全性(EAGLE-1):一项随机、对照、3期研究的设计
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Sep;12(9):2307-2320. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00862-6. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Gentamicin compared with ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea (G-ToG): a randomised non-inferiority trial.庆大霉素与头孢曲松治疗淋病(G-ToG)的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2511-2520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32817-4. Epub 2019 May 2.
8
Single-Dose Zoliflodacin (ETX0914) for Treatment of Urogenital Gonorrhea.单次剂量唑利福霉素(ETX0914)治疗泌尿生殖系统淋病。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1835-1845. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706988.
9
Microbiological Analysis from a Phase 2 Randomized Study in Adults Evaluating Single Oral Doses of Gepotidacin in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea Caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae.微生物分析:一项评价单次口服 gepotidacin 治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系淋病奈瑟菌引起的成人淋病的 2 期随机研究
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Nov 26;62(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01221-18. Print 2018 Dec.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Single-Dose Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Intramuscular Ceftriaxone for Uncomplicated Gonorrhea Treatment: An Open-Label, Noninferiority, Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Study.单次口服达拉非沙星与肌肉注射头孢曲松治疗单纯性淋病的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签、非劣效性、3 期、多中心、随机研究。
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 May;46(5):279-286. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000971.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial resistance in in nine sentinel countries within the World Health Organization Enhanced Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (EGASP), 2023: a retrospective observational study.2023年世界卫生组织强化淋球菌抗菌药物监测计划(EGASP)九个哨点国家的抗菌药物耐药性:一项回顾性观察研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Aug 21;61:101663. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101663. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.新型抗生素的肾毒性:一项系统评价
Toxics. 2025 Jul 19;13(7):606. doi: 10.3390/toxics13070606.
3
Comparing Strategies to Introduce Two New Antibiotics for Gonorrhea: A Modeling Study.
比较引入两种治疗淋病新抗生素的策略:一项建模研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 3:2025.07.01.25330638. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.01.25330638.
4
Antimicrobial resistance in and its risk groups in 23 European countries in 2022 within the European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP): a retrospective observational study.2022年欧洲淋球菌抗菌监测计划(Euro-GASP)下23个欧洲国家的抗菌药物耐药性及其风险群体:一项回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 10;54:101318. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101318. eCollection 2025 Jul.