Brown-Weinstock Rachel, Kang Megan, Edin Kathryn, Pachman Sarah, Bolin Kaitlyn
Princeton University, Department of Sociology, Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Center for Research and Child and Family Wellbeing, Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544.
J Marriage Fam. 2025 Apr;87(2):527-546. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13032. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
This study uses in-depth interview data to investigate the impact of non-parental, "other adults" (OAs) on youth development and highlights the importance of better measuring OAs' contributions through the nation's survey infrastructure.
Extant survey measures of youths' social relationships were developed in an anomalous historical period of nuclear family dominance. We argue that these measures do not capture the demographic and economic shifts of the late 20 century, which likely made OAs more salient in youths' lives.
Analyses draw on life history interviews with 40 youth-primary caregiver dyads sampled from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS). We triangulate interview data with questionnaires from the four major nationally representative surveys used in research on youth outcomes to compare how meaningful social ties were described by interviewees versus operationalized in surveys.
We identified four limitations of extant survey measures in capturing youth-OA relationships. Existing measures typically reproduce the nuclear family model by centering biological and stepparent relationships to the exclusion of OAs; capture OAs' financial contributions but not their socioemotional contributions; neglect harmful OA influences; and treat OAs as aggregates, missing within-group heterogeneity. We illustrated these limitations using the rich interview data.
The FFCWS, drawing on these interviews, has added new measures capturing youth-OA relationships to its year 22 survey wave. Future studies can use these measures to better estimate the population-level effects of OAs and alternative family structures on the outcomes of youth raised in nonnuclear and disadvantaged families.
本研究利用深度访谈数据,调查非父母“其他成年人”(OAs)对青少年发展的影响,并强调通过国家调查基础设施更好地衡量OAs贡献的重要性。
现有的青少年社会关系调查指标是在核心家庭占主导地位的异常历史时期制定的。我们认为,这些指标没有反映20世纪后期的人口和经济变化,而这些变化可能使OAs在青少年生活中更加突出。
分析采用了对从家庭与儿童福祉未来研究(FFCWS)中抽取的40对青少年-主要照顾者二元组进行的生活史访谈。我们将访谈数据与用于青少年结果研究的四项主要全国代表性调查的问卷进行三角测量,以比较受访者描述的有意义的社会关系与调查中实际操作的社会关系。
我们确定了现有调查指标在捕捉青少年与OAs关系方面的四个局限性。现有指标通常以生物学和继父母关系为中心,排除OAs,从而再现核心家庭模式;只捕捉OAs的经济贡献,而不捕捉他们的社会情感贡献;忽视OAs的有害影响;将OAs视为总体,忽略了群体内部的异质性。我们用丰富的访谈数据说明了这些局限性。
基于这些访谈,FFCWS在其第22轮调查中增加了捕捉青少年与OAs关系的新指标。未来的研究可以使用这些指标,更好地估计OAs和替代家庭结构对在非核心和弱势家庭中成长的青少年的结果的总体影响。