• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Origin of Syphilis in Europe: End of a Controversy?].[梅毒在欧洲的起源:争议的终结?]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2025 Mar 21;5(1). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v5i1.2025.666. eCollection 2025 Mar 31.
2
The "Scourge of the Renaissance". A Short Review About infection.《文艺复兴之殇》。关于传染病的简短述评。
Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2020;20(3):335-343. doi: 10.2174/1871530319666191009144217.
3
History of syphilis: between poetry and medicine.梅毒的历史:在诗歌与医学之间。
J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):307-10. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12354. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
4
Origin and evolution of syphilis: drifting myth.梅毒的起源与演变:飘忽不定的谜团。
Skinmed. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):8-12.
5
Syphilis at the crossroad of phylogenetics and paleopathology.梅毒处于系统发生学和古病理学的十字路口。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jan 5;4(1):e575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000575.
6
The European-American exchange.欧美交流。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1993;15(3):313-27.
7
A historical approach to syphilis infection in Korea.韩国梅毒感染情况的历史研究方法。
Acta Med Hist Adriat. 2018 Oct 29;16(2):185-202. doi: 10.31952/amha.16.2.1.
8
The origin of syphilis. Clinical and epidemiologic considerations on the Columbian theory.梅毒的起源。关于哥伦布理论的临床与流行病学考量
Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Mar-Apr;20(2):110-7.
9
[Venereal syphilis is not of American origin].
Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1974 Jan-Feb;67(1):40-4.
10
[Syphilis in Europe in antiquity: the fetus of Costebelle and other new gifts from osteoarchaeology].
Vesalius. 2000 Jun;6(1):55-63.

本文引用的文献

1
Redefining the treponemal history through pre-Columbian genomes from Brazil.通过巴西的哥伦布前基因组重新定义密螺旋体的历史。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8002):182-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06965-x. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Archaeogenetics: What Can Ancient Genomes Tell Us about the Origin of Syphilis?考古遗传学:古代基因组能告诉我们梅毒的起源吗?
Curr Biol. 2020 Oct 5;30(19):R1092-R1095. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.022.
3
Ancient Bacterial Genomes Reveal a High Diversity of Treponema pallidum Strains in Early Modern Europe.古代细菌基因组揭示了近代早期欧洲梅毒螺旋体菌株的高度多样性。
Curr Biol. 2020 Oct 5;30(19):3788-3803.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.058. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
4
Advancing the understanding of treponemal disease in the past and present.推进对过去和现在梅毒螺旋体病的认识。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 May;171 Suppl 70:5-41. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23988. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
5
Historic Treponema pallidum genomes from Colonial Mexico retrieved from archaeological remains.从考古遗迹中提取的殖民时期墨西哥梅毒螺旋体的历史基因组。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jun 21;12(6):e0006447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006447. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Origin of modern syphilis and emergence of a pandemic Treponema pallidum cluster.现代梅毒的起源和流行苍白螺旋体簇的出现。
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Dec 5;2:16245. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.245.
7
A probable case of congenital syphilis from pre-Columbian Austria.一例来自前哥伦布时期奥地利的先天性梅毒疑似病例。
Anthropol Anz. 2015;72(4):451-72. doi: 10.1127/anthranz/2015/0504. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
8
Which theory for the origin of syphilis is true?关于梅毒起源的哪种理论是正确的?
J Sex Med. 2014 Dec;11(12):3112-8. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12674. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
9
The science behind pre-Columbian evidence of syphilis in Europe: research by documentary.欧洲前哥伦布时期梅毒证据的科学依据:纪录片研究。
Evol Anthropol. 2012 Mar;21(2):50-7. doi: 10.1002/evan.20340.
10
Genetic diversity in Treponema pallidum: implications for pathogenesis, evolution and molecular diagnostics of syphilis and yaws.梅毒螺旋体的遗传多样性:对梅毒和雅司病发病机制、进化和分子诊断的影响。
Infect Genet Evol. 2012 Mar;12(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

[梅毒在欧洲的起源:争议的终结?]

[Origin of Syphilis in Europe: End of a Controversy?].

作者信息

Louis Jean-Paul, Louis Francis

机构信息

diplômé de médecine tropicale, titulaire du CES de santé publique, spécialiste de recherches du Service de santé des armées en lutte contre les grandes endémies.

diplômé de médecine tropicale, spécialiste des hôpitaux des armées en biologie et diplômé de santé.

出版信息

Med Trop Sante Int. 2025 Mar 21;5(1). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v5i1.2025.666. eCollection 2025 Mar 31.

DOI:10.48327/mtsi.v5i1.2025.666
PMID:40248579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12001989/
Abstract

Upon Christopher Columbus's return, an unknown disease was discovered in Barcelona, Spain, in 1493, before appearing in Naples, Italy, in 1494/1495 during a war with France. Initially described among the troops, it quickly spread throughout Europe as the armies withdrew. The question arises whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship with Columbus's return to Spain or if it is merely a coincidence, as syphilis seems to have been present in Europe before Europeans arrived in the Americas, though it may not have been identified as such. This would explain why it was not clearly recognized by the population or described in the available literature. Recently, archaeological and paleopathological research on human remains from the modern era, supported by genetic data, has clearly established the presence of syphilis in ancient Europe. These findings also suggest that syphilis may not have existed in the Americas during Columbus's time. However, it seems possible that Columbus's companions brought back to Europe a non-venereal strain of treponematosis, which could have mutated while adapting to new environmental conditions, increasing its pathogenicity and altering its mode of transmission when transferred to new individuals, possibly prostitutes. In turn, this venereal syphilis strain may have infected the American continent during the Spanish conquests and/or the transatlantic slave trade. This study provides some recent arguments to fuel the controversy.

摘要

1493年,克里斯托弗·哥伦布归来后,西班牙巴塞罗那发现了一种未知疾病,1494/1495年,在与法国交战期间,该疾病出现在意大利那不勒斯。最初在军队中被描述,随着军队撤离,它迅速蔓延至整个欧洲。问题在于,这与哥伦布返回西班牙是否存在因果关系,还是仅仅是巧合,因为梅毒似乎在欧洲人抵达美洲之前就已在欧洲存在,尽管当时可能未被识别出来。这可以解释为什么当时民众没有清楚地认识到它,也没有在现有文献中描述。最近,在基因数据的支持下,对现代人类遗骸进行的考古和古病理学研究明确证实了古代欧洲存在梅毒。这些发现还表明,在哥伦布时代,梅毒可能在美洲并不存在。然而,似乎有可能是哥伦布的同伴将一种非性病性的密螺旋体病带回了欧洲,这种病菌在适应新环境条件时可能发生了变异,增加了致病性,并在传播给新个体(可能是妓女)时改变了传播方式。反过来,这种性病性梅毒菌株可能在西班牙征服和/或跨大西洋奴隶贸易期间感染了美洲大陆。这项研究提供了一些最新论据,加剧了这场争论。