Lorenz Tierney, Harp Nicholas, Pierce Jordan E, Angeletti Peter, Neta Maital
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Center for Brain Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Stress Health. 2025 Apr;41(2):e70035. doi: 10.1002/smi.70035.
Heightened reactivity to ambiguous emotional stimuli, such as surprized faces, is a transdiagnostic psychopathology risk factor. Women show elevated amygdala activation to ambiguous emotional stimuli relative to men, which may underlie their significantly higher risk for mood disorders. Moreover, there are sex/gender differences in the effects of stress on both emotion processing and emotion regulation, with greater impact of stress on negative emotionality in females. We predicted that chronic stress would be associated with stronger amygdala activation to surprized faces, and these effects would be amplified in girls/women. We tested the interactions of chronic stress and gender/sex on amygdala activity in a sample of 297 healthy participants (59% girls/women, age range 6-75 years) who provided a saliva sample and who viewed emotional face stimuli while undergoing functional neuroimaging. Saliva samples were assayed for two markers of chronic stress: Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) expression and diversity of Lactobacilli species. Among girls/women, higher chronic stress was associated with greater amygdala activation to ambiguous emotional images than lower stress exposure, although this effect was not statistically significant. Counter to predictions, the reverse effect was found among boys/men (i.e., higher stress exposure was associated with lower amygdala activation). Results were similar across left and right amygdalae, and across both stress measures. Although our findings are preliminary and should be replicated, they align with findings on gender differences in valence bias, and broadly support the hypothesis that there are gender/sex differences in the effects of chronic stress on neural reactivity to emotional ambiguity, particularly in areas of the brain sensitive to emotion regulation. Possibly, stress does not universally increase negativity, but instead amplifies default emotional biases-which for boys/men, may result in less amygdala reactivity.
对模糊情感刺激(如惊讶的面孔)反应增强是一种跨诊断的精神病理学风险因素。相对于男性,女性对模糊情感刺激表现出杏仁核激活增强,这可能是她们患情绪障碍风险显著更高的潜在原因。此外,压力对情绪加工和情绪调节的影响存在性别差异,压力对女性负面情绪的影响更大。我们预测慢性压力会与对惊讶面孔的更强杏仁核激活相关,并且这些影响在女孩/女性中会被放大。我们在297名健康参与者(59%为女孩/女性,年龄范围6 - 75岁)的样本中测试了慢性压力与性别对杏仁核活动的相互作用,这些参与者提供了唾液样本,并在接受功能神经成像时观看情感面部刺激。对唾液样本检测了两种慢性压力标志物:爱泼斯坦 - 巴尔病毒(EBV)表达和乳酸杆菌种类的多样性。在女孩/女性中,较高慢性压力与对模糊情感图像更强的杏仁核激活相关,而较低压力暴露则不然,尽管这种影响在统计学上不显著。与预测相反,在男孩/男性中发现了相反的效应(即较高压力暴露与较低杏仁核激活相关)。左右杏仁核以及两种压力测量方法的结果相似。尽管我们的发现是初步的且应重复验证,但它们与效价偏差方面的性别差异研究结果一致,并广泛支持以下假设:慢性压力对情绪模糊性神经反应性(特别是在对情绪调节敏感的脑区)存在性别差异影响。可能压力并非普遍增加消极情绪,而是放大默认情绪偏差——对男孩/男性而言,这可能导致杏仁核反应性降低。