Suppr超能文献

牙本质过敏症治疗创新方法的体内和原位评估

In vivo and in situ evaluation of innovative approaches in dentin hypersensitivity treatment.

作者信息

Abd El-Fattah Mohamed Heba, Ezzeldin Mohamed Dina, Hassanein Elhassan, Salah El-Din Hamza Heba El-Din

机构信息

Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, 11 El- Saraya St, Manial, Cairo, 11553, Egypt.

Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05865-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) causes transient sharp pain from exposed dentinal tubules, adversely affecting oral health and quality of life. This study compared the efficacy of two innovative treatments against Sodium Fluoride Varnish in reducing DH and occluding dentinal tubules over eight weeks.

METHODS

This randomized, triple-blind, three-parallel-arm clinical and in situ study included a total of 63 participants (age range: 26-46 years), each randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: PRG Barrier Coat, Embrace varnish, or Duraphat varnish. The clinical trial assessed pain intensity was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after tactile, evaporative, and thermal stimuli at baseline, 3 min, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The in-situ phase evaluated dentinal tubules occlusion pre- and post-treatment using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 2000× magnification. Statistical Analysis was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests for intergroup and intragroup comparisons, respectively, and Spearman's correlation for pain reduction-tubule occlusion relationship (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

PRG Barrier Coat achieved the highest efficacy with 94.9% pain reduction and 96.9% tubule occlusion. Embrace varnish showed moderate results with 64.3% pain reduction and 69.7% tubule occlusion, while Duraphat varnish provided limited performance with 45.4% pain reduction and 48.3% tubule occlusion. PRG Barrier Coat exhibited the most prolonged effects in reducing dentin hypersensitivity, aligning with its higher tubule occlusion. Embrace varnish demonstrated moderate performance, showing initial pain relief that was less sustained over time. Duraphat varnish provided the least reduction in pain and tubule occlusion, with effects that appeared transient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that PRG Barrier Coat and Embrace varnish effectively reduced pain intensity and promoted dentinal tubule occlusion, with PRG Barrier Coat showing the most sustained effects. These findings highlight the importance of dentinal tubule occlusion in DH management and suggest that treatment selection should consider both immediate pain relief and durability of therapeutic effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04568473) on September 23, 2020.

摘要

背景

牙本质过敏症(DH)会导致暴露的牙本质小管产生短暂的剧痛,对口腔健康和生活质量产生不利影响。本研究比较了两种创新疗法与氟化钠涂剂在八周内减轻牙本质过敏症和封闭牙本质小管方面的疗效。

方法

这项随机、三盲、三平行组的临床及体内研究共纳入63名参与者(年龄范围:26 - 46岁),他们被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:PRG屏障涂层、Embrace涂剂或Duraphat涂剂。在基线、3分钟、2周、4周和8周时,通过触觉、蒸发和热刺激后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估临床试验中的疼痛强度。体内阶段在治疗前后使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)以2000倍放大倍数评估牙本质小管的封闭情况。分别使用Kruskal - Wallis检验和Friedman检验进行组间和组内比较的统计分析,并使用Spearman相关性分析疼痛减轻与小管封闭的关系(p < 0.05)。

结果

PRG屏障涂层的疗效最高,疼痛减轻94.9%,小管封闭96.9%。Embrace涂剂效果中等,疼痛减轻64.3%,小管封闭69.7%;而Duraphat涂剂表现有限,疼痛减轻45.4%,小管封闭48.3%。PRG屏障涂层在减轻牙本质过敏症方面效果持续时间最长,与其较高的小管封闭率相符。Embrace涂剂表现中等,初期疼痛缓解但随着时间推移维持效果较差。Duraphat涂剂在减轻疼痛和小管封闭方面效果最差,效果似乎是短暂的。

结论

本研究表明,PRG屏障涂层和Embrace涂剂能有效减轻疼痛强度并促进牙本质小管封闭,PRG屏障涂层效果最持久。这些发现突出了牙本质小管封闭在牙本质过敏症管理中的重要性,并表明治疗选择应同时考虑即时疼痛缓解和治疗效果的持久性。

试验注册

2020年9月23日在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04568473)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ed6/12008923/d4e9a9a25a4b/12903_2025_5865_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验