Westermann Rasmus, Cordtz René, Duch Kirsten, Mellemkjaer Lene, Hetland Merete Lund, Rasmussen Linda Aagaard, Dreyer Lene
Center of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
RMD Open. 2025 Apr 20;11(2):e005247. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005247.
To investigate the risk of cancer recurrence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and a prior solid cancer in remission treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) compared with those who received only conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs).
Nationwide registry-based cohort study of Danish patients with RA and one of the six algorithm-specific solid cancers in remission (breast, colorectal, melanoma, bladder, endometrial and lung) who initiated treatment with a bDMARD or a csDMARD. Three bDMARD exposure groups were defined according to the type(s) of bDMARD initiated: (1) any bDMARD, (2) tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and (3) rituximab. Patients were identified in Danish Rheumatology Quality Register and followed for cancer recurrence from 2002 to 2021 using validated cancer-specific recurrence algorithms. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate HRs for cancer recurrence in each bDMARD exposure group compared with a csDMARD-treated group.
Among 720 unique patients with RA and an algorithm-specific solid cancer in remission, 170 any bDMARD, 81 TNFi, 99 rituximab and 651 csDMARD initiators were identified. No statistically significant increased HRs for cancer recurrence were found with any type of bDMARD 0.92 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.73), TNFi 1.10 (95% CI 0.21 to 3.16) or rituximab 0.94 (95% CI 0.32 to 2.11). Also, no increased HRs were shown for breast cancer recurrence specifically.
No indications of increased cancer recurrence risk were found for bDMARDs as used in clinical practice in patients with RA and a solid cancer in remission when compared with csDMARD treatment.
研究类风湿关节炎(RA)患者且既往有实体癌处于缓解期,接受生物性改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)治疗与仅接受传统合成抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)治疗相比,癌症复发的风险。
基于丹麦全国登记的队列研究,纳入患有RA且六种特定算法的实体癌之一处于缓解期(乳腺癌、结直肠癌、黑色素瘤、膀胱癌、子宫内膜癌和肺癌)并开始使用bDMARD或csDMARD治疗的患者。根据开始使用的bDMARD类型定义了三个bDMARD暴露组:(1)任何bDMARD,(2)肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi),(3)利妥昔单抗。在丹麦风湿病质量登记处识别患者,并使用经过验证的癌症特异性复发算法从2002年至2021年随访癌症复发情况。采用治疗权重的逆概率和加权病因特异性Cox模型计算每个bDMARD暴露组与csDMARD治疗组相比癌症复发的HRs。
在720例患有RA且有特定算法实体癌处于缓解期的独特患者中,识别出170例开始使用任何bDMARD、81例开始使用TNFi、99例开始使用利妥昔单抗和651例开始使用csDMARD的患者。未发现任何类型的bDMARD(HR = 0.92,95%CI 0.38至1.73)、TNFi(HR = 1.10,95%CI 0.21至3.16)或利妥昔单抗(HR = 0.94,95%CI 0.32至2.11)导致癌症复发的HRs有统计学显著增加。此外,乳腺癌复发的HRs也未增加。
与csDMARD治疗相比,在临床实践中,RA患者且实体癌处于缓解期使用bDMARDs未发现癌症复发风险增加的迹象。