Westlund Schreiner Mindy, Thomas Leah R, Le Ha D H, Pazdera Myah, Feldman Daniel A, Farstead Brian, Bessette Katie L, Welsh Robert C, Crowell Sheila E, Kaufman Erin A, Klumpp Heide, Langenecker Scott A
Department of Behavioral Health, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Mar 4;5(3):100479. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100479. eCollection 2025 May.
Childhood maltreatment (CM) is associated with negative mental health outcomes. Many studies conceptualize resilience as experiencing CM without developing psychopathology (primary resilience). However, some people may develop subsequent psychopathology but recover and demonstrate higher global functioning (secondary resilience). This study investigated the role of salience and emotion network (SEN) (including the amygdala, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior insula) and cognitive control network (CCN) (including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal lobule, and thalamus) connectivity in primary and secondary resilience.
We examined resting-state functional connectivity in 108 nonclinical control participants and 154 individuals with any mood disorder (AMD). We measured functioning and CM using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), respectively. For primary resilience, we conducted whole-brain analyses of SEN and CCN regions to test for group × CTQ interactions. For secondary resilience, within-AMD group analyses tested for CTQ × GAF interactions.
Group × CTQ interactions revealed that control participants with higher levels of CM showed greater within-SEN and within-CCN connectivity than participants in the AMD group. In the AMD group, participants with higher levels of CM and functioning (secondary resilience) showed greater within-CCN connectivity while participants with higher levels of CM and lower functioning showed greater within-SEN connectivity.
Greater SEN connectivity appears to play a key role in primary resilience, as observed in the control group, but only within the context of greater CCN connectivity. Future work should explore which cognitive control features are most beneficial and whether targeted interventions help foster resilience to recurrent psychopathology.
童年期虐待(CM)与负面心理健康结果相关。许多研究将复原力概念化为经历CM但未发展出精神病理学症状(原发性复原力)。然而,有些人可能随后发展出精神病理学症状,但恢复并表现出更高的整体功能(继发性复原力)。本研究调查了显著性和情绪网络(SEN)(包括杏仁核、膝下前扣带回皮质和前岛叶)以及认知控制网络(CCN)(包括背外侧前额叶皮质、顶下小叶和丘脑)连接性在原发性和继发性复原力中的作用。
我们检查了108名非临床对照参与者和154名患有任何情绪障碍(AMD)的个体的静息态功能连接性。我们分别使用功能总体评定量表(GAF)和儿童创伤问卷(CTQ)来测量功能和CM。对于原发性复原力,我们对SEN和CCN区域进行全脑分析,以测试组×CTQ交互作用。对于继发性复原力,在AMD组内进行分析,测试CTQ×GAF交互作用。
组×CTQ交互作用显示,CM水平较高的对照参与者比AMD组的参与者在SEN和CCN内表现出更强的连接性。在AMD组中,CM水平较高且功能良好(继发性复原力)的参与者在CCN内表现出更强的连接性,而CM水平较高且功能较差的参与者在SEN内表现出更强的连接性。
如在对照组中观察到的那样,更强的SEN连接性似乎在原发性复原力中起关键作用,但仅在更强的CCN连接性背景下如此。未来的工作应探索哪些认知控制特征最有益,以及有针对性的干预措施是否有助于培养对复发性精神病理学的复原力。