Xie Shu, Li Xiaoping, Liu Yanfeng, Huang Jian, Yang Fangying
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Changsha Fourth Hospital, Changsha, 410006, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03656-3.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and pulmonary rehabilitation have both shown promise in improving symptoms and lung function in COPD patients. However, the combined effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation and NPPV on moderate to severe COPD patients remain unclear.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPRNG group) compared to conventional treatment (CTG group) in patients with moderate to severe COPD.
A total of 269 patients with moderate to severe COPD were enrolled, with 137 patients in the CTG group and 132 in the CPRNG group. The primary outcome measures included the COPD assessment test (CAT) score, modified medical research council scale (mMRC) score, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) percentage, 6-min walk test, and arterial oxygen pressure (PaO₂). Secondary outcomes included various dimensions of quality of life (impact, symptoms, and activity) measured through patient-reported outcomes.
Baseline comparisons between groups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, disease duration, or symptoms. The CPRNG group showed significant improvements compared to the CTG group in the CAT score (p = 0.028), mMRC score (p = 0.015), FEV1% (p = 0.008), 6-min walk test (p = 0.001), and PaO₂ (p < 0.001). Additionally, improvements in impact, symptoms, activity, and overall scores were significantly better in the CPRNG group (p < 0.05).
Home pulmonary rehabilitation combined with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation significantly improves multiple dimensions of quality of life, particularly in controlling symptoms and enhancing daily activities in COPD patients. This combined therapy proves to be an effective treatment strategy, offering notable benefits in lung function, exercise capacity, and overall quality of life in COPD patients.
The clinical trial was registered retrospectively on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2500096605) on 2025-01-26, as required by The Fourth Hospital of Institutional (Changsha Fourth Hospital, Hunan Province, China) Review Board guidelines. Ethics approval date: January 2023 to December 2025.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种进行性呼吸系统疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。无创正压通气(NPPV)和肺康复在改善COPD患者的症状和肺功能方面均显示出前景。然而,家庭肺康复和NPPV对中重度COPD患者的联合效果仍不明确。
本研究旨在评估家庭肺康复联合无创正压通气(CPRNG组)与传统治疗(CTG组)相比,对中重度COPD患者的疗效。
共纳入269例中重度COPD患者,CTG组137例,CPRNG组132例。主要结局指标包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)评分、改良医学研究委员会量表(mMRC)评分、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV₁)百分比、6分钟步行试验和动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)。次要结局包括通过患者报告结局测量的生活质量的各个维度(影响、症状和活动)。
两组间的基线比较显示,在社会人口学特征、病程或症状方面无显著差异。与CTG组相比,CPRNG组在CAT评分(p = 0.028)、mMRC评分(p = 0.015)、FEV1%(p = 0.008)、6分钟步行试验(p = 0.001)和PaO₂(p < 0.001)方面有显著改善。此外,CPRNG组在影响、症状、活动和总体评分方面的改善明显更好(p < 0.05)。
家庭肺康复联合无创正压通气显著改善了生活质量的多个维度,特别是在控制COPD患者的症状和增强日常活动方面。这种联合治疗被证明是一种有效的治疗策略,在COPD患者的肺功能、运动能力和总体生活质量方面提供了显著益处。
根据中国湖南省长沙市第四医院机构审查委员会指南的要求,该临床试验于2025年1月26日在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR,www.chictr.org.cn,ID:ChiCTR2500096605)进行回顾性注册。伦理批准日期:2023年1月至2025年12月。