Patel Purvi Pravinchandra, Egodage Tanya, Martin Matthew J
Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Apr 14;10(Suppl 1):e001784. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2025-001784. eCollection 2025.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of trauma-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with decompressive craniectomy (DC) serving as a critical surgical intervention. This article reviews the recent studies evaluating the role of DC in the management of elevated intracranial pressures (ICPs) associated with TBI and its impact on functional outcomes. Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury (DECRA), Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of intracranial pressure (RESCUEicp), and Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH) are three landmark trials that used varying thresholds for surgical intervention after TBI and examined how functional outcomes improved with time. The DECRA trial evaluated early DC in patients with moderate ICP elevations, demonstrating reduced intensive care unit and hospital stays but poorer functional outcomes at 6 months. Conversely, the RESCUEicp trial emphasized the benefits of delayed DC as a rescue strategy for refractory ICP, showing reduced mortality and improved Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended scores at 24 months. The RESCUE-ASDH trial compared DC and craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma, finding no significant differences in functional outcomes but distinct profiles of surgical complications. Key recommendations emphasize individualized decision-making based on patient-specific factors, including preinjury functional status and family involvement. This comprehensive review underscores the importance of tailoring DC timing and techniques to optimize functional recovery and align with patient-centered goals, advancing the multidisciplinary management of severe TBI.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球创伤相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因,减压性颅骨切除术(DC)是一种关键的外科干预措施。本文回顾了最近评估DC在治疗与TBI相关的颅内压(ICP)升高方面的作用及其对功能结局影响的研究。弥漫性创伤性脑损伤减压颅骨切除术(DECRA)、颅内压无法控制升高的颅骨切除术随机评估(RESCUEicp)以及急性硬膜下血肿清除术患者颅骨切除术随机评估(RESCUE-ASDH)是三项具有里程碑意义的试验,它们在TBI后使用了不同的手术干预阈值,并研究了功能结局如何随时间改善。DECRA试验评估了中度ICP升高患者的早期DC,结果显示重症监护病房和住院时间缩短,但6个月时功能结局较差。相反,RESCUEicp试验强调了延迟DC作为难治性ICP抢救策略的益处,显示24个月时死亡率降低,格拉斯哥预后量表扩展评分改善。RESCUE-ASDH试验比较了DC和开颅手术治疗急性硬膜下血肿的效果,发现功能结局无显著差异,但手术并发症情况不同。关键建议强调基于患者特定因素的个体化决策,包括伤前功能状态和家庭参与情况。这一全面综述强调了调整DC时机和技术以优化功能恢复并符合以患者为中心目标的重要性,推动了重度TBI的多学科管理。