• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线上社交互动对城市社区凝聚力及群体差异的影响:来自中国的证据

The impact of online social interaction on urban community cohesion and group differences: evidence from China.

作者信息

Li Haibo, Li Haitao, Zhou Xing, Kuang Yin, Liu Feiyue

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Changsha University, Changsha, China.

School of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):1484. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22680-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22680-w
PMID:40264036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12012984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the advent of the digital age, online social interaction has become an important form of interpersonal communication. This increasing popularity of online interaction has led to a growing debate about its impact on community cohesion. However, the effects and mechanisms by which online social interaction affects community cohesion are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the correlations between online social interaction and community cohesion in the Chinese context.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study examines urban community residents (n = 1037) across China's eastern, central, and western regions, with proportional sampling to ensure geographic representation. Data were collected via random questionnaires. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we empirically assess (1) the impact of online social interaction on community cohesion, (2) the underlying mechanisms, and (3) heterogeneity effects across demographic and regional subgroups.

RESULTS

The direct influence of online social interaction on community cohesion was significantly positive (β = 0.694, P = 0.000), and the indirect effect of social interaction on community cohesion through offline social interaction was also significantly positive(β = 0.243, P = 0.000). The effects of online social interaction on community cohesion show significant heterogeneity across demographic groups and geographic regions, being more pronounced among middle-aged residents (β = 0.901, P = 0.000), male residents (β = 0.727, P = 0.000), and married residents (β = 0.779, P = 0.000) relative to their respective counterparts. The effect magnitude in the eastern region (β = 0.784, P = 0.000) substantially exceeds that in both central and western regions.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that online social interaction is an important factor affecting the formation of urban residents' community cohesion, and offline social interaction plays a mediating role. In addition, The association between online social interaction and community cohesion demonstrates significant heterogeneity across demographic and regional subgroups.

摘要

背景

随着数字时代的到来,在线社交互动已成为人际沟通的一种重要形式。在线互动的日益普及引发了关于其对社区凝聚力影响的越来越多的争论。然而,在线社交互动影响社区凝聚力的效果和机制尚未得到充分理解。本研究旨在探讨中国背景下在线社交互动与社区凝聚力之间的相关性。

方法

本横断面研究调查了中国东部、中部和西部地区的城市社区居民(n = 1037),采用比例抽样以确保地理代表性。通过随机问卷调查收集数据。使用结构方程模型(SEM),我们实证评估了(1)在线社交互动对社区凝聚力的影响,(2)潜在机制,以及(3)不同人口统计学和区域亚组之间的异质性影响。

结果

在线社交互动对社区凝聚力的直接影响显著为正(β = 0.694,P = 0.000),社交互动通过线下社交互动对社区凝聚力的间接影响也显著为正(β = 0.243,P = 0.000)。在线社交互动对社区凝聚力的影响在不同人口统计学群体和地理区域之间存在显著异质性,相对于各自的对应群体,在中年居民(β = 0.901,P = 0.000)、男性居民(β = 0.727,P = 0.000)和已婚居民(β = 0.779,P = 0.000)中更为明显。东部地区的影响程度(β = 0.784,P = 0.000)大幅超过中部和西部地区。

结论

研究结果表明,在线社交互动是影响城市居民社区凝聚力形成的重要因素,线下社交互动起中介作用。此外,在线社交互动与社区凝聚力之间的关联在不同人口统计学和区域亚组之间表现出显著异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c475/12012984/a76627565a0b/12889_2025_22680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c475/12012984/a76627565a0b/12889_2025_22680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c475/12012984/a76627565a0b/12889_2025_22680_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of online social interaction on urban community cohesion and group differences: evidence from China.线上社交互动对城市社区凝聚力及群体差异的影响:来自中国的证据
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):1484. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22680-w.
2
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Psychological Distress among Urban Adults: The Moderating Role of Neighborhood Social Cohesion.城市成年人心理困扰中的社会经济不平等:邻里社会凝聚力的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0157119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157119. eCollection 2016.
3
The impact of neighborhood environment on the mental health: evidence from China.邻里环境对心理健康的影响:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1452744. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452744. eCollection 2024.
4
Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.中国北京不同年龄段社区居民构建老年友好型社区过程的多维评估:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Mar 21;11:e66248. doi: 10.2196/66248.
5
Perceived social cohesion and depressive symptoms among internal migrants in China: The mediating role of social adaptation.中国国内移民的感知社会凝聚力与抑郁症状:社会适应的中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;11:1096318. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1096318. eCollection 2023.
6
Interrelationship between Interpersonal Interaction Intensity and Health Self-Efficacy in People with Diabetes or Prediabetes on Online Diabetes Social Platforms: An In-Depth Survey in China.糖尿病或糖尿病前期患者在在线糖尿病社交平台上的人际互动强度与健康自我效能之间的相互关系:中国的深入调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 26;17(15):5375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155375.
7
Associations between Community Cohesion and Subjective Wellbeing of the Elderly in Guangzhou, China-A Cross-Sectional Study Based on the Structural Equation Model.基于结构方程模型的中国广州社区凝聚力与老年人主观幸福感的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;18(3):953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030953.
8
Does where you live matter to your health? Investigating factors that influence the self-rated health of urban and rural Chinese residents: evidence drawn from Chinese General Social Survey data.你居住的地方对你的健康有影响吗?探究影响中国城乡居民自评健康的因素:基于中国综合社会调查数据的证据
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 21;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0658-0.
9
Living alone, social cohesion, and quality of life among older adults in rural and urban China: a conditional process analysis.独居、社会凝聚力与中国城乡老年人的生活质量:有条件的过程分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2021 May;33(5):469-479. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220001210. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
The role of neighborhood social capital on health and health inequality in rural and urban China.邻里社会资本对中国城乡健康和健康不平等的作用。
Prev Med. 2022 Mar;156:106989. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106989. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Social diversity and social cohesion in Britain.英国的社会多样性和社会凝聚力。
Br J Sociol. 2024 Sep;75(4):452-470. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13094. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
2
Impact of Neighborhood Social Cohesion and Rodent Sightings on Mental Health among Residents of New York City During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间邻里社会凝聚力和鼠类目击对纽约市居民心理健康的影响。
J Urban Health. 2024 Apr;101(2):308-317. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00847-x. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Association between neighbourhood cohesion and physical activity trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic using data from : The UK Household Longitudinal Study & COVID-19 sub-study.
利用英国家庭纵向研究和新冠疫情子研究的数据,探讨新冠疫情期间社区凝聚力与身体活动轨迹之间的关联。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 29;35:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102392. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
We are all in this together: Rurality, Social cohesion, and COVID-19 prevention behaviors.我们都在一起:农村地区、社会凝聚力和 COVID-19 预防行为。
J Rural Health. 2024 Jan;40(1):154-161. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12781. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
The Role of Community Cohesion in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Cross-sectional Study.社区凝聚力在 COVID-19 大流行期间对老年人的作用:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 14;9:e45110. doi: 10.2196/45110.
6
Online social capital: recent trends in research.在线社会资本:研究的最新趋势
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Dec;36:147-152. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.031. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
7
Neighborhood disadvantage, residents' distress, and online social communication: Harnessing Twitter data to examine neighborhood effects.邻里劣势、居民困扰与在线社交沟通:利用推特数据研究邻里效应
J Community Psychol. 2018 Sep;46(7):829-843. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21975. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Locations that Support Social Activity Participation of the Aging Population.支持老年人口社会活动参与的场所。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Aug 26;12(9):10432-49. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120910432.
9
A retrospective study on changes in residents' physical activities, social interactions, and neighborhood cohesion after moving to a walkable community.一项关于居民搬至适宜步行社区后身体活动、社交互动及邻里凝聚力变化的回顾性研究。
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69 Suppl 1:S93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
10
Companionship in the neighborhood context: older adults' living arrangements and perceptions of social cohesion.邻里环境中的陪伴:老年人的居住安排与社会凝聚力认知
Res Aging. 2014 Mar;36(2):228-43. doi: 10.1177/0164027512475096. Epub 2013 Feb 7.