• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可解释人工智能的机器学习模型用于预测肾移植后30天再入院情况的开发。

Development of explainable artificial intelligence based machine learning model for predicting 30-day hospital readmission after renal transplantation.

作者信息

Alnazari Nasser, Alanazi Omar Ibrahim, Alosaimi Muath Owaidh, Alanazi Ziyad Mohamed, Alhajeri Ziyad Mohammed, Alhussaini Khaled Mohammed, Alanazi Abdulkarim Mekhlif, Azzam Ahmed Y

机构信息

Hepatobiliary Science and Organ Transplant Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04128-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12882-025-04128-w
PMID:40264055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013099/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmission following renal transplantation significantly impacts patient outcomes and healthcare resources. While machine learning approaches offer promising solutions for risk prediction, their clinical application often lacks interpretability. We developed an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based supervised learning model to predict 30-day hospital readmission risk following renal transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 588 renal transplant recipients at King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, with a predominance of living donor transplants (85.2%, n = 500). Our methodology included a four-stage machine learning pipeline: data processing, feature preparation, model development using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and clinical validation. Multiple algorithms were evaluated, with gradient boosting demonstrating superior performance. Model interpretability was achieved through dual-approach analysis using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations).

RESULTS

The gradient boosting model demonstrated strong performance (AUC 0.837, 95% CI: 0.802-0.872) with accuracy of 0.796 ± 0.050 and sensitivity of 0.388 ± 0.129. Length of hospital stay (38.0% contribution) and post-transplant systolic blood pressure (30.0% contribution) emerged as primary predictors, with differences between living and deceased donor subgroups. Pre-transplant BMI showed a higher importance in deceased donor recipients (12.6% vs. 2.6%), while HbA1c and eGFR were more impacting in living donor outcomes. The readmission rate in our cohort (88.9%, n = 523) was higher than previously reported ranges (18-47%), likely reflecting center-specific practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Our XAI-based machine learning model combines strong predictive performance with clinical interpretability, offering transplant physicians donor-specific risk stratification capabilities. The web-based implementation facilitates practical integration into clinical workflows. Given our single-center experience and high proportion of living donors, external validation across diverse transplant centers is essential before widespread implementation. Our approach establishes a framework for developing center-specific risk prediction tools in transplant medicine.

摘要

背景

肾移植后的医院再入院对患者预后和医疗资源有显著影响。虽然机器学习方法为风险预测提供了有前景的解决方案,但其临床应用往往缺乏可解释性。我们开发了一种基于可解释人工智能(XAI)的监督学习模型,以预测肾移植后30天的医院再入院风险。

方法

我们对阿卜杜拉国王国际医学研究中心的588名肾移植受者进行了回顾性分析,其中活体供体移植占多数(85.2%,n = 500)。我们的方法包括一个四阶段的机器学习流程:数据处理、特征准备、使用分层5折交叉验证的模型开发以及临床验证。评估了多种算法,梯度提升显示出卓越的性能。通过使用SHAP(SHapley加性解释)和LIME(局部可解释模型无关解释)的双方法分析实现了模型可解释性。

结果

梯度提升模型表现出强大的性能(AUC 0.837,95% CI:0.802 - 0.872),准确率为0.796 ± 0.050,灵敏度为0.388 ± 0.129。住院时间(贡献38.0%)和移植后收缩压(贡献30.0%)成为主要预测因素,活体和 deceased 供体亚组之间存在差异。移植前BMI在 deceased 供体受者中显示出更高的重要性(12.6%对2.6%),而糖化血红蛋白和估算肾小球滤过率对活体供体结果的影响更大。我们队列中的再入院率(88.9%,n = 523)高于先前报道的范围(18 - 47%),这可能反映了中心特定的做法。

结论

我们基于XAI的机器学习模型将强大的预测性能与临床可解释性相结合,为移植医生提供了供体特异性风险分层能力。基于网络的实施便于实际整合到临床工作流程中。鉴于我们的单中心经验和活体供体的高比例,在广泛实施之前,跨不同移植中心的外部验证至关重要。我们的方法为移植医学中开发中心特定的风险预测工具建立了一个框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/90b65095e061/12882_2025_4128_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/43a578cb6bcb/12882_2025_4128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/96f022697b99/12882_2025_4128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/f77dcd7f7f61/12882_2025_4128_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/935fa76fb8f0/12882_2025_4128_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/90b65095e061/12882_2025_4128_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/43a578cb6bcb/12882_2025_4128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/96f022697b99/12882_2025_4128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/f77dcd7f7f61/12882_2025_4128_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/935fa76fb8f0/12882_2025_4128_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370b/12013099/90b65095e061/12882_2025_4128_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of explainable artificial intelligence based machine learning model for predicting 30-day hospital readmission after renal transplantation.基于可解释人工智能的机器学习模型用于预测肾移植后30天再入院情况的开发。
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04128-w.
2
Machine learning-enabled prediction of prolonged length of stay in hospital after surgery for tuberculosis spondylitis patients with unbalanced data: a novel approach using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).机器学习在数据不平衡的情况下预测脊柱结核手术后住院时间延长的预测:一种使用可解释人工智能 (XAI) 的新方法。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 25;29(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01988-0.
3
An explainable supervised machine learning predictor of acute kidney injury after adult deceased donor liver transplantation.一种可解释的监督机器学习预测成人死后供肝移植后急性肾损伤的方法。
J Transl Med. 2021 Jul 28;19(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02990-4.
4
Artificial intelligence assisted risk prediction in organ transplantation: a UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction tool.人工智能辅助的器官移植风险预测:一种英国活体供肾移植结果预测工具。
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2431147. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Investigating Protective and Risk Factors and Predictive Insights for Aboriginal Perinatal Mental Health: Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach.探究原住民围产期心理健康的保护因素、风险因素及预测性见解:可解释人工智能方法
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e68030. doi: 10.2196/68030.
6
Artificial intelligence for predicting survival following deceased donor liver transplantation: Retrospective multi-center study.人工智能预测脑死亡供肝移植术后患者的生存情况:回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106838. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106838. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Responsible AI for cardiovascular disease detection: Towards a privacy-preserving and interpretable model.心血管疾病检测的负责任 AI:迈向隐私保护和可解释的模型。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Sep;254:108289. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108289. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
8
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of readmission within one year in HFpEF patients: Short title: Prediction of HFpEF readmission.预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者一年内再入院风险的机器学习模型的开发与验证:短标题:HFpEF再入院预测
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Feb;194:105703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105703. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
9
Beyond black-box models: explainable AI for embryo ploidy prediction and patient-centric consultation.超越黑箱模型:用于胚胎倍性预测和以患者为中心咨询的可解释人工智能
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Sep;41(9):2349-2358. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03178-7. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
10
Artificial intelligence in hospital infection prevention: an integrative review.医院感染预防中的人工智能:一项综合综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;13:1547450. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547450. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.血液系统恶性肿瘤中的感染性休克:人工智能在预测预后中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 10;32(8):450. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080450.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence assisted risk prediction in organ transplantation: a UK Live-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction tool.人工智能辅助的器官移植风险预测:一种英国活体供肾移植结果预测工具。
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2431147. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2431147. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
How Explainable Artificial Intelligence Can Increase or Decrease Clinicians' Trust in AI Applications in Health Care: Systematic Review.可解释人工智能如何增加或降低临床医生对医疗保健中人工智能应用的信任:系统评价
JMIR AI. 2024 Oct 30;3:e53207. doi: 10.2196/53207.
3
Correction: The efficacy of machine learning models in lung cancer risk prediction with explainability.
更正:具有可解释性的机器学习模型在肺癌风险预测中的疗效。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0310604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310604. eCollection 2024.
4
Machine learning-based risk prediction model construction of difficult weaning in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation.基于机器学习的 ICU 机械通气患者撤机困难风险预测模型的构建。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 6;14(1):20875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71548-3.
5
The transformative potential of artificial intelligence in solid organ transplantation.人工智能在实体器官移植中的变革潜力。
Front Transplant. 2024 Mar 15;3:1361491. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1361491. eCollection 2024.
6
Predicting kidney allograft survival with explainable machine learning.利用可解释机器学习预测肾移植的存活率。
Transpl Immunol. 2024 Aug;85:102057. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2024.102057. Epub 2024 May 24.
7
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
8
The Dawn of a New Era in Kidney Transplantation: Promises and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnostics.肾脏移植新时代的曙光:人工智能在精准诊断中的前景与局限
Transpl Int. 2023 Dec 14;36:12010. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.12010. eCollection 2023.
9
Machine learning in precision diabetes care and cardiovascular risk prediction.机器学习在精准糖尿病护理和心血管风险预测中的应用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Sep 25;22(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01985-3.
10
Machine Learning and the Conundrum of Stroke Risk Prediction.机器学习与中风风险预测难题
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Apr 12;12:e07. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.34. eCollection 2023.