Liu Yuxiu, Wu Wei, Li Shuzhen, Wang Xin, Zhang Lan
Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Liaoning, Jinzhou, China.
Heze Home Economics College, Heze, China.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 22;24(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03099-5.
Suicide represents a significant public health concern at the global level and is a major area of concern for mental health professionals. Nurses are positioned to identify and manage individuals at risk of suicide or suicidal ideation. It is widely acknowledged that ensuring nurses are adequately trained to assess and manage suicidal patients is of paramount importance in the prevention of suicide. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and structural validity of the Suicide Management Competency Scale (SMCS) in clinical nurses population.
A total of 452 clinical nurses in a third-class hospital in Liaoning Province were selected using convenience sampling. The survey was conducted using the general demographic questionnaire and the Suicide Management Competency Scale (SMCS). The reliability and acceptability of the scale were assessed by checking the consistency of the scale part, the split-half reliability coefficient, and the correlation between each item and the score of the total scale. Confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and discriminant validity were used to determine the dimensional structure and validity of the scale.
The internal consistency of the scale, as indicated by the Cronbach's α coefficient, was 0.902. The split-half reliability coefficient was 0.771. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis were as follows: CMIN/DF = 2.609, RMSEA = 0.060, RMR = 0.040, CFI = 0.957, GFI = 0.930, NFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.949, IFI = 0.958. All of the model fitting indexes were within the acceptable range. The average variance extracted (AVE) of the three subscales ranged from 0.500 to 0.583. The combined reliability values (CR) range from 0.848 to 0.888, indicating that the SMCS scale exhibits good convergence validity. The analysis of the correlation coefficient between the subscale and the total scale revealed that the AVE square root value of each subscale is between 0.707 and 0.763, which is greater than the correlation coefficient between the two indicators. This indicates that there are significant differences between the subscales of the SMCS, that the internal structure of the questionnaire is highly differentiated, and that the discrimination validity is good.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the inaugural study to report the utilisation of the Suicide Management Competency Scale (SMCS) in the context of clinical nursing. The findings offer preliminary support for the utilisation of the SMCS in clinical nurses. In the future, nursing managers will be able to effectively evaluate clinical nurses' ability to manage and prevent suicide, as well as train nurses in this area, with the ultimate goal of saving as many lives as possible.
自杀是全球层面一个重大的公共卫生问题,也是心理健康专业人员主要关注的领域。护士有能力识别和管理有自杀风险或自杀意念的个体。人们普遍认为,确保护士接受充分培训以评估和管理自杀患者对于预防自杀至关重要。本研究的目的是检验自杀管理能力量表(SMCS)在临床护士群体中的信度和结构效度。
采用便利抽样法选取辽宁省某三级医院的452名临床护士。使用一般人口学问卷和自杀管理能力量表(SMCS)进行调查。通过检查量表部分的一致性、分半信度系数以及各项目与总量表得分之间的相关性来评估量表的信度和可接受性。采用验证性因素分析、收敛效度和区分效度来确定量表的维度结构和效度。
量表的内部一致性,以Cronbach's α系数表示,为0.902。分半信度系数为0.771。验证性因素分析结果如下:CMIN/DF = 2.609,RMSEA = 0.060,RMR = 0.040,CFI = 0.957,GFI = 0.930,NFI = 0.933,TLI = 0.949,IFI = 0.958。所有模型拟合指标均在可接受范围内。三个子量表的平均提取方差(AVE)范围为0.500至0.583。组合信度值(CR)范围为0.848至0.888,表明SMCS量表具有良好的收敛效度。子量表与总量表之间的相关系数分析表明,各子量表的AVE平方根值在0.707至0.763之间,大于两个指标之间的相关系数。这表明SMCS的子量表之间存在显著差异,问卷的内部结构高度分化,区分效度良好。
据我们所知,这是首次报告在临床护理背景下使用自杀管理能力量表(SMCS)的研究。研究结果为在临床护士中使用SMCS提供了初步支持。未来,护理管理者将能够有效评估临床护士管理和预防自杀的能力,并在这一领域培训护士,最终目标是挽救尽可能多的生命。