Li Chuang, Meng Zhi Xing, Lin You Bei, Zhang Lan
Nursing Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.
School of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 7;24(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03113-w.
Currently, no standardized evaluation instrument exists to assess the impact of presenteeism on nurses' productivity and the quality of care they provide. This study aimed to translate the Sickness Presenteeism Scale-Nurse (SPS-N) into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity among Chinese nurses.
This study first translated the 21-item English version of the SPS-N scale into Chinese using Brislin's model. Then, six experts in the relevant field were invited to evaluate the item content validity index (I-CVI) of the translated scale. Using a convenience sampling method, 503 clinical nurses meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited from tertiary hospitals in Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China. The reliability of the scale was assessed through internal consistency, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. To examine the structural validity of the Chinese version of the SPS-N (C-SPS-N), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted first, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to further assess its construct validity.
The C-SPS-N demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.924. The item content validity index (I-CVI) for individual items ranged from 0.830 to 1.000. The split-half reliability was 0.750, and the test-retest reliability was 0.895. The four-factor exploratory factor model explained 78.354% of the total variance, indicating a robust factor structure. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) produced model fit indices of CMIN/DF = 2.527, RMSEA = 0.067, AGFI = 0.857, TLI = 0.941, IFI = 0.950, CFI = 0.949, GFI = 0.900, and PGFI = 0.692. All indices fell within acceptable ranges, confirming a satisfactory model fit. Both convergent validity and discriminant validity were adequately supported.
This study strictly adhered to the Brislin translation model and successfully introduced the SPS-N scale, which demonstrated strong reliability and validity in the Chinese cultural context. The Chinese version of the SPS-N (C-SPS-N) serves as an effective and reliable tool for assessing nurses' presenteeism behaviors.
目前,尚无标准化的评估工具来评估出勤主义对护士工作效率及其提供的护理质量的影响。本研究旨在将《患病出勤主义量表 - 护士版》(SPS - N)翻译成中文,并评估其在中国护士中的信效度。
本研究首先使用布里斯林模型将21项英文版的SPS - N量表翻译成中文。然后,邀请6位相关领域的专家评估翻译后量表的条目内容效度指数(I - CVI)。采用便利抽样法,从中国辽宁省锦州市的三级医院招募了503名符合纳入标准的临床护士。通过内部一致性、分半信度和重测信度评估量表的信度。为检验中文版SPS - N(C - SPS - N)的结构效度,首先进行探索性因子分析(EFA),然后进行验证性因子分析(CFA)以进一步评估其构想效度。
C - SPS - N表现出较强的心理测量学特性,克朗巴哈α系数为0.924。各条目的条目内容效度指数(I - CVI)范围为0.830至1.000。分半信度为0.750,重测信度为0.895。四因素探索性因子模型解释了总方差的78.354%,表明因子结构稳健。验证性因子分析(CFA)产生的模型拟合指数为CMIN/DF = 2.527,RMSEA = 0.067,AGFI = 0.857,TLI = 0.941,IFI = 0.950,CFI = 0.949,GFI = 0.900,PGFI = 0.692。所有指数均在可接受范围内,证实模型拟合良好。收敛效度和区分效度均得到充分支持。
本研究严格遵循布里斯林翻译模型,成功引入了SPS - N量表,该量表在中国文化背景下表现出较强的信效度。中文版SPS - N(C - SPS - N)是评估护士出勤主义行为的有效且可靠的工具。