Liu Ke-Xian, Wu Yuan-Yuan, Zhang Meng, Jia Meng, Wang Dan, Zhang Cai-Xia, Guan Yi-Chun, Tian Pei-Ling
Center for Reproductive Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Nursing Department, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 22;83(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01571-x.
To assess the impact of various non-pharmacological interventions on the likelihood of achieving pregnancy in individuals undergoing IVF/ICSI.
Despite significant advancements in assisted reproductive technology, the strategic utilization of non-pharmacological interventions to enhance clinical outcomes continues to pose a significant challenge in the field of reproductive medicine.
Relevant studies published in English or Chinese were comprehensively selected from databases including CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to December 2023. Studies that examined various non-pharmacological interventions during IVF/ICSI treatment, and reported subsequent pregnancy outcomes, were included. The control group received standard treatment. Study quality was assessed based on the methodology and criteria outlined in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023414729).
Out of the initial 28,688 studies identified, 43 trials involving 5,779 women were included. When compared to the control treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy, acupuncture, lifestyle intervention, health education, and music therapy were associated with a significantly increased likelihood of clinical pregnancy (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.72; 1.89, 1.46 to 2.43; 1.75, 1.18 to 2.57; 2.10, 1.57 to 2.80; 1.52, 1.08 to 2.13, respectively). Among the non-pharmacological treatments studied, cognitive-behavioral therapy and lifestyle intervention were associated with the highest number of oocytes retrieved (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.86; 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.58, compared to controls). No significant differences were observed among non-pharmacological interventions and the control group. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and health education led to the highest rate of high-quality embryos (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84; 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.97, compared to controls).
Non-pharmacological treatments such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, health education, lifestyle intervention, acupuncture, and music therapy showed trends suggesting better clinical outcomes in terms of pregnancy achievement compared to the control group. More high-level RCT studies are clearly necessary for future meta-analyses to better guide clinical practice.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND/OR HEALTH POLICY: Policymakers should promote non-pharmacological programs for infertile population and develop standard guidelines. This will ensure that non-pharmacological interventions are implemented responsibly, protecting patient rights and enhancing healthcare outcomes.
评估各种非药物干预措施对接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)的个体实现妊娠可能性的影响。
尽管辅助生殖技术取得了重大进展,但在生殖医学领域,战略性地利用非药物干预措施来改善临床结局仍然是一项重大挑战。
从包括中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据、维普数据库、PubMed、科学网(Web of Science)和Embase在内的数据库中全面筛选截至2023年12月发表的英文或中文相关研究。纳入研究IVF/ICSI治疗期间各种非药物干预措施并报告随后妊娠结局的研究。对照组接受标准治疗。根据Cochrane协作手册中概述的方法和标准评估研究质量。本综述方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号:CRD42023414729)。
在最初识别出的28688项研究中,纳入了43项试验,涉及5779名女性。与对照治疗相比,认知行为疗法、针灸、生活方式干预、健康教育和音乐疗法与临床妊娠可能性显著增加相关(优势比分别为1.44,95%置信区间1.21至1.72;1.89,1.46至2.43;1.75,1.18至2.57;2.10,1.57至2.80;1.52,1.08至2.13)。在所研究的非药物治疗中,认知行为疗法和生活方式干预与回收的卵母细胞数量最多相关(与对照组相比,优势比分别为0.31,95%置信区间0.11至0.86;0.15,95%置信区间0.04至0.58)。非药物干预措施与对照组之间未观察到显著差异。认知行为疗法和健康教育导致高质量胚胎率最高(与对照组相比,优势比分别为0.41,95%置信区间0.20至0.84;0.52,95%置信区间0.28至0.97)。
与对照组相比,认知行为疗法、健康教育、生活方式干预、针灸和音乐疗法等非药物治疗显示出在实现妊娠方面临床结局更好的趋势。显然,未来进行荟萃分析需要更多高质量的随机对照试验(RCT)研究,以更好地指导临床实践。
对护理和/或卫生政策的启示:政策制定者应推广针对不孕人群的非药物项目并制定标准指南。这将确保非药物干预措施得到合理实施,保护患者权利并改善医疗保健结局。