DiMasi Joseph A, Olson Melvin Skip, Smith Zachary, Getz Kenneth A, Capkun Gorana
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Olson Strategies GmbH, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00778-y.
The use of Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs) by the pharmaceutical industry has expanded in recent years with the aim of optimizing healthcare and patient outcomes. The evidence base of IEPs goes beyond traditional randomized controlled trials to provide holistic evidence suitable for all stakeholders and allows for consideration of different packages in different regions. However, this approach to drug development is not systematically adopted by all sponsors because of perceived uncertainty in its investment value.
We introduce the concept of value drivers to which we apply an expected net present value (eNPV) model of the cash flows for drug development and commercialization. The approach is outlined for two, typical, hypothetical lifecycle management IEPs. The measure of IEP value is defined as the increment in eNPV that occurs when IE programs are employed in comparison to when they are not.
We found substantial value for IEPs. One example incorporated a plan to conduct an observational study that could be used as a basis for approval in lieu of a classical phase II trial for a supplemental indication. In the other example, increased adoption of the new treatment leads to a highly positive increment in eNPV based on the critical evidence generated in a phase IIIb study.
Use of value drivers and eNPV-based value models when planning for IEPs can provide objective guidance for project teams. The value can be estimated through formal economic analysis that considers planned timelines, R&D costs, estimates of the likelihood of regulatory approval, patient access and clinical adoption if development is successful.
近年来,制药行业对综合证据计划(IEP)的使用有所增加,目的是优化医疗保健和患者治疗效果。IEP的证据基础超越了传统的随机对照试验,以提供适合所有利益相关者的全面证据,并允许考虑不同地区的不同方案。然而,由于其投资价值存在不确定性,并非所有申办者都系统地采用这种药物开发方法。
我们引入了价值驱动因素的概念,并将其应用于药物开发和商业化现金流的预期净现值(eNPV)模型。针对两个典型的假设生命周期管理IEP概述了该方法。IEP价值的衡量标准定义为与不采用IE计划相比,采用IE计划时eNPV的增量。
我们发现IEP具有巨大价值。一个例子纳入了一项观察性研究计划,该研究可作为补充适应症批准的依据,以替代经典的II期试验。在另一个例子中,基于IIIb期研究产生的关键证据,新疗法采用率的提高导致eNPV出现高度正增长。
在规划IEP时使用价值驱动因素和基于eNPV的价值模型可为项目团队提供客观指导。可以通过正式的经济分析来估计价值,该分析考虑计划时间表、研发成本、监管批准可能性的估计、患者可及性以及如果开发成功临床采用情况。