Akınoğlu Bihter, Örsçelik Aydan, Ezgi Yılmaz Ayfer, Usman Shehu Salman, Özal Şeyma, Günaydın Hüseyin, Kocahan Tuğba
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Department of Sports Medicine, Gülhane Medical Faculty, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 16;71(1):19-27. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.14060. eCollection 2025 Mar.
This study aimed to compare the acute effects of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (r-ESWT) and focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (f-ESWT) on pain, muscle strength, and function in patients with lateral epicondylitis (LE).
Fifty-six patients (31 males, 25 females; mean age: 44.6±8.4 years; range, 19 to 60 years) who were diagnosed with LE participated in the randomized study between August 2023 and October 2023. The patients were stratified by pain level to have four r-ESWT or f-ESWT treatments once a week. Patients were evaluated on the first day of treatment and one week after the last treatment. The outcome measures used were the Visual Analog Scale for pain, isokinetic dynamometer for wrist muscle strength measurement, the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score for functional status, and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) for health-related quality of life.
After the treatment, the pain at rest and during activity decreased in both groups (p=0.018, p=0.001, p=0.003, and p<0.001). Nocturnal pain was found to be lower in the f-ESWT group (p=0.028). The isokinetic muscle strength of the wrist extensors was higher in the r-ESWT group compared to the f-ESWT group (p=0.002 and p=0.017). The DASH performance score of the r-ESWT group was higher compared to the f-ESWT group (p=0.009). Both groups showed improvements in SF-36 scores (p<0.05).
Both groups showed a decrease in pain levels, but the effects were superior in the f-ESWT group. However, r-ESWT was found to present better results in terms of its effect on isokinetic muscle strength. While f-ESWT may be more effective in reducing pain, r-ESWT may be more effective in increasing muscle strength.
本研究旨在比较桡侧体外冲击波疗法(r-ESWT)和聚焦体外冲击波疗法(f-ESWT)对肱骨外上髁炎(LE)患者疼痛、肌肉力量和功能的急性影响。
56例被诊断为LE的患者(31例男性,25例女性;平均年龄:44.6±8.4岁;范围19至60岁)于2023年8月至2023年10月参与了这项随机研究。患者按疼痛程度分层,每周接受4次r-ESWT或f-ESWT治疗。在治疗第一天和最后一次治疗后一周对患者进行评估。使用的结果指标包括疼痛视觉模拟量表、用于测量腕部肌肉力量的等速测力计、用于评估功能状态的DASH(上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍)评分以及用于评估健康相关生活质量的36项简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)。
治疗后,两组患者静息和活动时的疼痛均减轻(p = 0.018、p = 0.001、p = 0.003和p < 0.001)。发现f-ESWT组的夜间疼痛较低(p = 0.028)。与f-ESWT组相比,r-ESWT组腕伸肌的等速肌肉力量更高(p = 0.002和p = 0.017)。r-ESWT组的DASH表现评分高于f-ESWT组(p = 0.009)。两组的SF-36评分均有改善(p < 0.05)。
两组患者的疼痛水平均有所降低,但f-ESWT组的效果更优。然而,r-ESWT在对等速肌肉力量的影响方面表现出更好的结果。虽然f-ESWT在减轻疼痛方面可能更有效,但r-ESWT在增加肌肉力量方面可能更有效。