• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正确和错误反应时间的年龄及个体差异。

Age and individual differences in correct and error reaction times.

作者信息

Smith G A, Brewer N

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 1985 May;76 ( Pt 2):199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01943.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01943.x
PMID:4027487
Abstract

Rabbitt (1979, 1981) has argued that the slowing of choice RT performance with old age reflects less sensitive control over speed of responding. Based on the finding that old subjects' errors were as fast as young subjects', whereas their correct responses were much slower, Rabbitt suggested that old subjects often overshoot when trying to increase or reduce response speed. Data collected from a different serial, four-choice RT task in this experiment were not, however, consistent with Rabbitt's account. Error as well as correct RTs were longer in old than in young adults, with both showing similar increases with age. A post hoc examination of the aged subjects' data also indicated important individual differences within aged samples. Some subjects' RTs and error rates were no different from those of the young; other subjects' longer RTs and lower error rates were consistent with an increased emphasis on accuracy.

摘要

拉比特(1979年、1981年)认为,随着年龄增长,选择反应时任务表现变慢反映出对反应速度的控制不够灵敏。基于老年受试者的错误反应与年轻受试者一样快,而正确反应却慢得多这一发现,拉比特提出老年受试者在试图加快或减慢反应速度时常常会反应过度。然而,在本实验中从另一个系列的四选一反应时任务收集的数据并不支持拉比特的观点。老年成年人的错误反应时和正确反应时都比年轻成年人更长,二者都随年龄增长呈现出相似的增加趋势。对老年受试者数据的事后分析还表明,老年样本中存在重要的个体差异。一些受试者的反应时和错误率与年轻人无异;另一些受试者较长的反应时和较低的错误率则与更注重准确性相一致。

相似文献

1
Age and individual differences in correct and error reaction times.正确和错误反应时间的年龄及个体差异。
Br J Psychol. 1985 May;76 ( Pt 2):199-203. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01943.x.
2
How normal and retarded individuals monitor and regulate speed and accuracy of responding in serial choice tasks.正常人和智障人士如何在系列选择任务中监控和调节反应速度及准确性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Mar;113(1):71-93. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.1.71.
3
Slowness and age: speed-accuracy mechanisms.迟缓与年龄:速度-准确性机制
Psychol Aging. 1995 Jun;10(2):238-47. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.10.2.238.
4
Can the post-error effect mask age-related differences in congruency conditions when education and overall accuracy are controlled for?在控制教育程度和总体准确率的情况下,错误后效应会掩盖一致性条件下与年龄相关的差异吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jul;188:177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
Speed and accuracy in the choice reaction time of mildly retarded adults.轻度智力迟钝成年人选择反应时间的速度与准确性
Am J Ment Defic. 1979 Jul;84(1):55-61.
6
Rate of processing and judgment of response speed: comparing the effects of alcohol and practice.
Percept Psychophys. 1989 May;45(5):431-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03210717.
7
Information feedback, reaction time and error rates in young and old subjects.年轻和老年受试者的信息反馈、反应时间和错误率。
Exp Aging Res. 1979 Jun;5(3):207-15. doi: 10.1080/03610737908257199.
8
Age, information processing speed, and intelligence.年龄、信息处理速度与智力。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1994 Aug;47(3):741-60. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401135.
9
Inter- and intra-individual differences in semantic priming among young and older adults.年轻人和老年人在语义启动方面的个体间差异和个体内差异。
Exp Aging Res. 1995 Jul-Sep;21(3):221-37. doi: 10.1080/03610739508253982.
10
Error negativity and response control.错误负波与反应控制。
Psychophysiology. 2002 Mar;39(2):198-206. doi: 10.1017/S0048577202010247.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of scoring algorithms for the NIH Toolbox executive function tasks in a U.S. norming sample.美国常模样本中美国国立卫生研究院工具箱执行功能任务评分算法的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Dec;36(12):760-771. doi: 10.1037/pas0001350.
2
Stopping ability in younger and older adults: Behavioral and event-related potential.年轻人和老年人的停止能力:行为和事件相关电位。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Apr;17(2):348-363. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0483-7.
3
Task Inhibition and Response Inhibition in Older vs. Younger Adults: A Diffusion Model Analysis.
老年人与年轻人的任务抑制和反应抑制:扩散模型分析
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 15;7:1722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01722. eCollection 2016.
4
Changes in brain network efficiency and working memory performance in aging.衰老过程中脑网络效率和工作记忆表现的变化。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123950. eCollection 2015.
5
Correlations between brain activity and components of motor learning in middle-aged adults: an fMRI study.中年成年人脑活动与运动学习成分的相关性:一项 fMRI 研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 6;7:169. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00169. eCollection 2013.
6
The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: a structural model-based approach.老年人大脑中的速度-准确性权衡:一种基于结构模型的方法。
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 23;31(47):17242-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0309-11.2011.
7
The effects of aging on the speed-accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the diffusion model.老化对速度-准确性权衡的影响:扩散模型中的边界最优性。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):377-90. doi: 10.1037/a0018022.