• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a participatory action project to improve safety and outcomes in maternity care.一项旨在改善孕产妇护理安全性和结局的参与式行动项目评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 24;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01319-7.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Strengthening open disclosure in maternity services in the English NHS: the DISCERN realist evaluation study.加强英国国民保健制度产科服务中的公开披露:DISCERN 现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(22):1-159. doi: 10.3310/YTDF8015.
4
Researchers' perspectives of self-agency within a context of violence and harm in maternity care.研究人员在母婴护理中暴力和伤害背景下对自我代理的看法。
Midwifery. 2024 Oct;137:104120. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104120. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study.印度北方邦产妇保健机构中分娩和生育期间虐待妇女的调查:混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 23;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y.
6
"I managed to stand on my own. I saved my baby's life.": qualitative analysis of birth experiences from women living with HIV in Cape Town, South Africa.“我成功地站了起来。我救了我孩子的命。”:对南非开普敦 HIV 感染者生育经历的定性分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 8;21(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01881-3.
7
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
8
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.
9
': co-creation of a simple tool to measure women's experiences of respectful maternity care in urban Tanzania.:共同创建一个简单的工具,以衡量坦桑尼亚城市中妇女对尊重性孕产妇保健的体验。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2403972. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2403972. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
10
Empowering members of a rural southern community in Nigeria to plan to take action to prevent maternal mortality: A participatory action research project.赋予尼日利亚南部农村社区成员权力,以计划采取行动预防产妇死亡:一项参与式行动研究项目。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):e1600-e1611. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14244. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual Work Meetings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Good, Bad, and Ugly.新冠疫情期间的虚拟工作会议:利弊与问题
Small Group Res. 2022 Jun;53(3):343-365. doi: 10.1177/10464964211015286.
2
Inside the 'imperfect mosaic': Minority ethnic women's qualitative experiences of race and ethnicity during pregnancy, childbirth, and maternity care in the United Kingdom.“不完美马赛克”内景:英国少数族裔女性在怀孕、分娩和孕产护理期间的种族和族裔的定性体验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 21;23(1):2555. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17505-7.
3
The impact of birth trauma on the couple relationship and related support requirements; a framework analysis of parents' perspectives.出生创伤对夫妻关系的影响及相关支持需求;基于父母视角的框架分析。
Midwifery. 2023 Aug;123:103732. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103732. Epub 2023 May 20.
4
Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health.系统评价当代公共卫生领域共同创造、共同设计和共同生产所使用的理论。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):723-737. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad046.
5
Nothing about us without us: A co-production strategy for communities, researchers and stakeholders to identify ways of improving health and reducing inequalities.没有我们(被服务对象)的参与,就没有我们(服务提供方)的一切:一种社区、研究人员和利益攸关方共同制定的生产策略,旨在确定改善健康和减少不平等的方法。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):836-846. doi: 10.1111/hex.13709. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
6
Obstetric experiences of young black mothers: An intersectional perspective.年轻黑人母亲的产科经历:一个交叉视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;317:115604. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115604. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
7
The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review.利用共同生产、共同设计和共同创作来调动健康状况管理中的知识:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y.
8
Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future.绘制健康和社会关怀领域中共同生产和共同设计的定义:为未来提供经验教训的系统范围界定综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):902-913. doi: 10.1111/hex.13470. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Intimate Partner Violence and Barriers to Help-Seeking Among Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic and Immigrant Women: A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Global Research.亲密伴侣暴力和寻求帮助的障碍黑人、亚裔、少数族裔和移民妇女:全球研究的定性综合分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Apr;24(2):1001-1015. doi: 10.1177/15248380211050590. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
10
More than a method: trusting relationships, productive tensions, and two-way learning as mechanisms of authentic co-production.不止是一种方法:信任关系、建设性冲突以及双向学习作为真正共同生产的机制
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 31;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00262-5.

一项旨在改善孕产妇护理安全性和结局的参与式行动项目评估。

Evaluation of a participatory action project to improve safety and outcomes in maternity care.

作者信息

Balaam Marie-Clare, Thomson Gill

机构信息

Research in Childbirth and Health (ReaCH Unit), School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

Parental and Infant Nutrition and Nurture Research Team (MAINN), School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 24;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01319-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-025-01319-7
PMID:40275367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12023642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal violence, in terms of obstetric violence and/or the disrespect and abuse of women and birthing people accessing maternity care, is a global concern. This mistreatment and experience of maternal violence and harm has negative physical and psychological impacts on women, birthing people and their babies. This paper evaluates a multipartner project which aimed to co-produce specialist resources to support women and birthing people who had experienced violence and harm. The evaluation sought to understand the collaborative and co-production processes employed and to identify recommendations and learning from the project.

METHODS

An ethnographic-based evaluation based on action research and participatory action research principles was undertaken using qualitative interviews, documentary review and observations. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 18 interviews were conducted with 21 participants from the lead, project partner and onward grant recipient organizations. In addition, 80 documents were reviewed, and 9 collaborative group meetings and 2 in-person events were observed. Factors which supported and inhibited effective collaborative working and co-production were identified in five aspects: ensuring inclusivity, clarity and transparency, building and maintaining relationships, collaboration and cooperation and active learning.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective collaborative co-production needs to consider issues of inclusivity and diversity and to ensure clarity and transparency in terms of remit, commitments and finances. Building and maintaining relationships between partners and communities by creating a safe space for participation and inclusive leadership was crucial. Recommendations from the evaluation include the need to ensure mechanisms for clear communication within projects from their inception as well as the need to acknowledge and proactively address issues of diversity and inclusivity throughout all aspects of the co-production process to support the fullest participation from diverse stakeholders.

摘要

背景

孕产妇暴力,即产科暴力和/或对接受孕产妇护理的妇女及分娩者的不尊重与虐待,是一个全球关注的问题。这种对孕产妇的暴力和伤害经历会对妇女、分娩者及其婴儿产生负面的生理和心理影响。本文评估了一个多伙伴项目,该项目旨在共同制作专业资源,以支持经历过暴力和伤害的妇女及分娩者。评估旨在了解所采用的协作与共同制作过程,并从该项目中确定建议和经验教训。

方法

采用基于人种志的评估方法,基于行动研究和参与式行动研究原则,通过定性访谈、文献回顾和观察来进行。使用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

共对来自牵头组织、项目合作伙伴及后续拨款接受组织的21名参与者进行了18次访谈。此外,还审查了80份文件,并观察了9次协作小组会议和2次现场活动。从确保包容性、清晰性和透明度、建立和维护关系、协作与合作以及积极学习这五个方面确定了支持和阻碍有效协作工作与共同制作的因素。

结论

有效的协作共同制作需要考虑包容性和多样性问题,并确保在职责范围、承诺和财务方面的清晰性和透明度。通过为参与创造安全空间和包容性领导来建立和维护合作伙伴与社区之间的关系至关重要。评估提出的建议包括,从项目一开始就需要确保项目内部清晰沟通的机制,以及需要在共同制作过程的各个方面承认并积极解决多样性和包容性问题,以支持不同利益相关者的充分参与。