Mathew Merrin, Doddaiah Narayanappa, Hussain Sakeer, Nambiar Nandana Suresh, Theempalangad Rovin Mathew, Narayanappa Sinchana, Shrisagar Rattehalli Ashwath Narayan
JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251332150. doi: 10.1177/21501319251332150. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
Influenza in India is increasingly shifting from seasonal outbreaks to an endemic presence with potential pandemic risks. Despite ongoing surveillance to monitor regional virus circulation, it's crucial to assess the unique socio-economic impact of influenza compared to other respiratory illnesses.
A retrospective study was conducted from October 2023 to October 2024, analysed 3 years of data from a south Indian tertiary care hospital. Children hospitalised with any subtypes of influenza infection were classified as Group 1, while those vaccinated with at least one dose of influenza vaccine from the hospital's immunisation centre formed Group 2. Trends in infection burden and vaccine utilization among paediatric population were detailed, with separate calculations of the economic burden for each group, leading to a summarized cost-benefit analysis.
Over three-years, Group 1 included 93 children were with a confirmed positive influenza test, while Group 2 consisted of 453 children who received at least one influenza vaccine at the study site. Hence the study site marked an influenza infection rate of 13.62% and a vaccination rate of 6.93%. Infections were more frequent in children over 1 year (74.19%), while vaccine utilization was highest in those under one (91.83%). Boys had a higher infection rate (65.59%) and demonstrated greater vaccine utilization (56.51%). Vaccine underutilization was evident, with only 1.99% receiving timely boosters, and 23.84% missing them. Infections were more prevalent among middle and lower-income children (86.02%), while vaccination rate was higher in upper income families (81.01%). Vaccination cost was 7.76 times lower than treatment; averaging INR 3252.21 (38.73 USD) per child, compared to treatment at INR 25 237.1 (300.14 USD). Net benefit ranged from INR 611 658.99 to INR 1 135 938.12, based on ±30% wage variations within the study community.
The study underscores the economic benefits of influenza vaccination; with costs nearly eight times lower than treatment. However, socio-economic disparities in vaccine utilization emphasize the need for targeted strategies to improve access in lower-income groups.
印度的流感正日益从季节性爆发转变为具有潜在大流行风险的地方病。尽管一直在进行监测以监控区域病毒传播情况,但评估流感相对于其他呼吸道疾病所产生的独特社会经济影响至关重要。
进行了一项回顾性研究,研究时间从2023年10月至2024年10月,分析了一家印度南部三级护理医院的3年数据。因任何亚型流感感染而住院的儿童被归类为第1组,而那些从医院免疫中心接种了至少一剂流感疫苗的儿童则组成第2组。详细阐述了儿科人群中的感染负担和疫苗使用趋势,并分别计算了每组的经济负担,从而得出了一项总结性的成本效益分析。
在三年期间,第1组包括93名流感检测呈确诊阳性的儿童,而第2组由453名在研究地点接受了至少一剂流感疫苗的儿童组成。因此,该研究地点的流感感染率为13.62%,疫苗接种率为6.93%。1岁以上儿童的感染更为频繁(74.19%),而1岁以下儿童的疫苗使用率最高(91.83%)。男孩的感染率较高(65.59%),且疫苗使用率也更高(56.51%)。疫苗使用不足的情况很明显,只有1.99%的儿童及时接种了加强针,23.84%的儿童未接种。中低收入家庭儿童的感染更为普遍(86.02%),而高收入家庭的疫苗接种率更高(81.01%)。疫苗接种成本比治疗成本低7.76倍;每名儿童平均为3252.21印度卢比(38.73美元),而治疗费用为25237.1印度卢比(300.14美元)。根据研究社区内±30%的工资差异,净效益在611658.99印度卢比至1135938.12印度卢比之间。
该研究强调了流感疫苗接种的经济效益;成本比治疗成本低近八倍。然而,疫苗使用方面的社会经济差异凸显了制定针对性策略以改善低收入群体疫苗可及性的必要性。