Ram Bhed, Thakur Ramna
School of Humanities and Social Sciences (SHSS), Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Kamand, India.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;10:901276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.901276. eCollection 2022.
Unlike other low- and middle-income countries, infectious diseases are still predominant, and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are emerging without replacing the burden of infectious diseases in India, where it is imposing a double burden of diseases on households in the country. This study aimed to analyse the socio-economic and demographic differentials in the magnitude of economic burden and coping strategies associated with health expenditure on infectious diseases in India. National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) data on "Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, (2017-18)" have been employed in this study. The findings of the study revealed that more than 33% of the individuals are still suffering from infectious diseases out of the total ailing population in India. Based on the various socio-economic and demographic covariates, infectious diseases are highly prevalent among individuals with marginalized characteristics, such as individuals residing in rural areas, females, 0-14 age groups, Muslims, illiterates, scheduled tribes (STs), and scheduled castes (SCs), large family households, and economically poor people in the country. The per capita out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure on infectious diseases is INR 7.28 and INR 29.38 in inpatient and outpatient care, respectively. Whereas, monthly per patient OOP expenditure on infectious diseases by infection-affected populations is INR 881.56 and INR 1,156.34 in inpatient and outpatient care in India. The study found that people residing in rural areas, SCs followed by other backward classes (OBCs), illiterates, poor, and very poor are more dependent on borrowings, sale of assets, and other distressed sources of financing. However, under National Health Policy 2017, many initiatives, such as "Ayushman Bharat," PM-JAY, and National Digital Health Mission (NDHM) in 2021, have been launched by the government of India in the recent years. These initiatives are holistically launched for ensuring better health facilities, but it is early to make any prediction regarding its outcomes; hopefully, the time will define it over the passing of a few more years. Finally, the study proposed the need for proper implementations of policy initiatives, awareness against unhygienic conditions and contamination of illnesses, immunisations/vaccination campaigns, subsidized medical facilities, and the country's expansion of quality primary health-care facilities.
与其他低收入和中等收入国家不同,传染病在印度仍然占主导地位,非传染性疾病(NCDs)正在出现,但并未取代传染病的负担,这给印度家庭带来了双重疾病负担。本研究旨在分析印度与传染病医疗支出相关的经济负担程度以及应对策略方面的社会经济和人口差异。本研究采用了国家抽样调查组织(NSSO)关于“印度社会消费关键指标:健康(2017 - 18年)”的数据。研究结果显示,在印度所有患病人口中,超过33%的人仍患有传染病。基于各种社会经济和人口协变量,传染病在具有边缘化特征的人群中高度流行,例如居住在农村地区的人、女性、0 - 14岁年龄组、穆斯林、文盲、在册部落(STs)和在册种姓(SCs)、大家庭户以及该国经济贫困的人群。传染病的人均自付(OOP)支出在住院和门诊护理中分别为7.28印度卢比和29.38印度卢比。而在印度,受感染人群在住院和门诊护理中因传染病产生的每月人均OOP支出分别为881.56印度卢比和1,156.34印度卢比。研究发现,居住在农村地区的人、SCs以及其他落后阶层(OBCs)、文盲、贫困和极贫困人口更依赖借贷、出售资产和其他困境融资来源。然而,根据2017年国家卫生政策,近年来印度政府发起了许多举措,如“阿育吠陀·巴拉特”、总理 - 全民健康保险计划(PM - JAY)以及2021年的国家数字健康使命(NDHM)。这些举措是全面发起的,以确保更好的医疗设施,但现在对其结果进行任何预测还为时过早;希望再过几年时间能给出定论。最后,该研究提出需要妥善实施政策举措、提高对不卫生条件和疾病传播的认识、开展免疫/疫苗接种运动、提供补贴医疗设施以及扩大该国优质初级卫生保健设施。