Kaawa-Mafigiri David, Muyomba Dickson, Kisakye Irene Sheila, Semakula Daniel, Sewankambo Nelson K
Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University School of Social Sciences, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Department of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12691-z.
When WHO declared the SARS-CoV- 2 respiratory virus pandemic in 2020, Uganda was unprepared to prevent and control its spread or manage the COVID- 19 and non-COVID patients. A community trial to assess the efficacy of an intensive community engagement and risk communication (CERC) was contemplated. However, a baseline assessment of the existing CERC status and the challenges of conducting community research in the early months of the pandemic was necessary.
A community baseline qualitative research (in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and household conversations) was implemented in 15 parishes (6 and 9 in Kawempe and Nakawa divisions respectively) of Kampala Capital City Authority, Uganda. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 20 household heads (n = 10 in each division), 50 household conversations (n = 25 in each division), and focus group discussions (n = 10, five in each division) were conducted during the pandemic from October 2020 to February 2021.
Many potential challenges to research involving CERC were identified and were categorized into three main interrelated domains: (a) implementation challenges (b) social, cultural, and political context of the research, and (c) budgetary and funding constraints.
The three interrelated challenges identified in this study should be considered in future plans for epidemic and pandemic preparedness. The practical application of conventional concepts like CE, risk communication, qualitative research methods must be re-examined prior to epidemics and pandemics to improve their applicability and responsiveness during complex, dynamic epidemics and pandemics.
2020年世界卫生组织宣布严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)引发呼吸道病毒大流行时,乌干达在预防和控制该病毒传播或管理新冠肺炎患者及非新冠肺炎患者方面毫无准备。于是考虑开展一项社区试验,以评估强化社区参与和风险沟通(CERC)的效果。然而,有必要对疫情最初几个月现有CERC的状况以及开展社区研究面临的挑战进行基线评估。
在乌干达坎帕拉首都城市管理局的15个教区(卡韦姆佩分区6个,纳卡瓦分区9个)开展了一项社区基线定性研究(深度访谈、关键信息人访谈、焦点小组讨论和家庭对话)。在2020年10月至2021年2月疫情期间,对20名户主(每个分区10名)进行了定性深度访谈,进行了50次家庭对话(每个分区25次),并开展了焦点小组讨论(共10次,每个分区5次)。
确定了许多涉及CERC研究的潜在挑战,并将其分为三个主要的相互关联领域:(a)实施挑战;(b)研究的社会、文化和政治背景;(c)预算和资金限制。
本研究中确定的三个相互关联的挑战应在未来的疫情防范计划中予以考虑。在疫情和大流行之前,必须重新审视诸如社区参与、风险沟通、定性研究方法等传统概念的实际应用,以提高其在复杂、动态的疫情和大流行期间的适用性和响应能力。