• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Community engagement during COVID: A field report from seven CTSAs.新冠疫情期间的社区参与:来自七个临床与转化科学奖项目的实地报告
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;5(1):e104. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.785.
2
Institutional community engagement leader perspectives on supporting ethical community-engaged research.机构社区参与领导者对支持符合伦理的社区参与研究的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 6;9(1):e27. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.1165. eCollection 2025.
3
Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference.2017年社区参与研究(CEnR)科学进展会议论文集
BMC Proc. 2019 Apr 19;13(Suppl 3):3. doi: 10.1186/s12919-019-0164-y. eCollection 2019.
4
A compendium of community engagement responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.社区对新冠疫情应对措施的汇总
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jun 14;5(1):e133. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.800. eCollection 2021.
5
Aligning community-engaged research competencies with online training resources across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium.使社区参与研究能力与临床和转化科学奖联盟的在线培训资源保持一致。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Sep 11;5(1):e45. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.538.
6
Report on CTSA consortium use of the community engagement consulting service.CTSA 联盟使用社区参与咨询服务报告。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Feb;6(1):34-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12006. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
7
Trust in Community-Engaged Research Partnerships: A Methodological Overview of Designing a Multisite Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Initiative.对社区参与研究伙伴关系的信任:设计多中心临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)计划的方法概述
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):180-192. doi: 10.1177/0163278718819719. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
8
Prioritizing studies of COVID-19 and lessons learned.优先开展对2019冠状病毒病的研究及总结经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 21;5(1):e106. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.784.
9
Best Practices for CEnR Partnerships for Health Equity.促进健康公平的社区参与式研究伙伴关系的最佳实践
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2025;19(1):35-43. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2025.a956595.
10
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Researcher and community partner perspectives on community-engaged research during the COVID-19 pandemic.研究人员和社区合作伙伴对新冠疫情期间社区参与研究的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 7;9(1):e163. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10090. eCollection 2025.
2
Experiences of community engagement for SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19 community surveillance in a rural and urban population in South Western Uganda.乌干达西南部城乡人口中针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)社区监测的社区参与经验
Afr Health Sci. 2024 Sep;24(3):10-20. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v24i3.3.
3
Research and community engagement during the COVID- 19 pandemic in a resource-limited setting: a mixed methods study with epidemic preparedness implications.资源有限环境下新冠疫情期间的研究与社区参与:一项具有疫情防范意义的混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12691-z.
4
Role of community engagement in advancing vaccine equity.社区参与在推进疫苗公平中的作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 20;12:1435231. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1435231. eCollection 2024.
5
2021 Community Engagement Studio Virtual Training Summit: Increasing the Diversity of Stakeholders Engaged in Research.2021 年社区参与工作室虚拟培训峰会:增加参与研究的利益相关者的多样性。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(2):277-285.
6
Wonderings to research questions: Engaging patients in long COVID research prioritization within a learning health system.对研究问题的思考:在学习型健康系统中让患者参与长新冠研究的优先级确定
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Feb 28;8(Suppl 1):e10410. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10410. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Delivering COVID-19 Vaccine via Trusted Social Services: Program Evaluation Results from the Chicagoland CEAL Program.通过可信赖的社会服务提供 COVID-19 疫苗:芝加哥地区 CEAL 计划的项目评估结果。
J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):61-69. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01242-4. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
Developing relevant assessments of community-engaged research partnerships: A community-based participatory approach to evaluating clinical and health research study teams.制定社区参与研究伙伴关系的相关评估:一种基于社区参与的方法来评估临床和健康研究团队。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 May 11;7(1):e123. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.544. eCollection 2023.
9
Developing patient-refined colorectal cancer screening materials: application of a virtual community engagement approach.开发患者精细化结直肠癌筛查材料:虚拟社区参与方法的应用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 24;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02774-8.
10
Lessons Learned from the Lessons Learned in Public Health during the First Years of COVID-19 Pandemic.从 COVID-19 大流行最初几年公共卫生中吸取的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1785. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031785.

本文引用的文献

1
The Community Leadership Institute of Kentucky (CLIK): A Collaborative Workforce and Leadership Development Program.肯塔基社区领导力学院(CLIK):一个协作型劳动力和领导力发展项目。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2021;15(1):95-105. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2021.0009.
2
Disparities in Incidence of COVID-19 Among Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic Groups in Counties Identified as Hotspots During June 5-18, 2020 - 22 States, February-June 2020.2020 年 2 月至 6 月,22 个州,在 2020 年 6 月 5 日至 18 日确定为热点的县中代表性不足的种族/族裔群体中 COVID-19 发病率的差异。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 21;69(33):1122-1126. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6933e1.
3
Engaging With Communities - Lessons (Re)Learned From COVID-19.社区参与——从 COVID-19 中汲取的(重新)经验教训。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 16;17:E65. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200250.
4
Structures of Human Antibodies Bound to SARS-CoV-2 Spike Reveal Common Epitopes and Recurrent Features of Antibodies.人类抗体与 SARS-CoV-2 刺突结合的结构揭示了常见表位和抗体的反复出现特征。
Cell. 2020 Aug 20;182(4):828-842.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals.恢复期患者体内对 SARS-CoV-2 的趋同抗体反应
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):437-442. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2456-9. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Hospitalization and Mortality among Black Patients and White Patients with Covid-19.新冠病毒感染住院患者的病死率:黑人和白人患者的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 25;382(26):2534-2543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2011686. Epub 2020 May 27.
7
Increasing uptake of evidence-based screening services though a community health worker-delivered multimodality program: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial.通过社区卫生工作者提供的多模式方案提高基于证据的筛查服务的利用率:一项随机实用试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 29;21(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4213-7.
8
The "All of Us" Research Program.“All of Us”研究计划。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937.
9
Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research: Clinical and Translational Science Institutional Practices.界定与衡量社区参与及社区参与研究:临床与转化科学机构实践
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):145-156. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0034.
10
Community engagement strategies in the original and renewal applications for CTSA grant funding.CTSA 拨款申请原始申请和更新申请中的社区参与策略。
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Feb;7(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/cts.12125. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

新冠疫情期间的社区参与:来自七个临床与转化科学奖项目的实地报告

Community engagement during COVID: A field report from seven CTSAs.

作者信息

Marsh Erica E, Kappelman Michael D, Kost Rhonda G, Mudd-Martin Gia, Shannon Jackilen, Stark Louisa A, Carrasquillo Olveen

机构信息

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NCTraCS) Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;5(1):e104. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.785.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2021.785
PMID:34192058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8185415/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prior to the COVID pandemic, many CTSAs employed face-to-face interactions to conduct most of their community engagement (CE) activities. During the COVID pandemic, such engagement had to be curtailed and alternatives needed to be formulated. In addition, Community Engaged Research (CEnR) teams refocused their efforts to address this public health crisis.

METHODS

To obtain a general understanding of how CTSAs have conducted CE and CEnR during the COVID pandemic, we invited seven CTSA CE leaders to provide brief field reports of their activities during the pandemic. This included how their approaches to CE and CEnR were modified during the COVID-19 pandemic and key lessons learned.

RESULTS

We found that despite numerous challenges, all seven CTSAs CE cores were able to successfully carry out CE and CEnR. We also found that the fundamental principles of meaningful and authentic stakeholder engagement were of paramount importance during the pandemic. Through virtual approaches, all sites had considerable success in maintaining CE in during the COVID pandemic. They also leveraged existing bi-directional community partnerships to carry out meaningful and impactful research. This included both new COVID CEnR and also innovative approaches to sustain prior non-COVID research.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that academic-community partnerships must be fostered and sustained over the many years so that when such crises emerge, all partners can build on existing trust and mutual respect. The lessons learned and the new tools and approaches developed would be key in addressing any such future public health emergencies.

摘要

引言

在新冠疫情之前,许多临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)项目通过面对面互动开展大部分社区参与(CE)活动。在新冠疫情期间,此类活动不得不缩减,需要制定替代方案。此外,社区参与研究(CEnR)团队重新调整工作重点以应对这一公共卫生危机。

方法

为全面了解CTSA项目在新冠疫情期间如何开展社区参与和社区参与研究,我们邀请了七位CTSA社区参与负责人简要汇报他们在疫情期间的活动情况。这包括他们在新冠疫情期间社区参与和社区参与研究方法的调整以及吸取的主要经验教训。

结果

我们发现,尽管面临诸多挑战,所有七个CTSA项目的社区参与核心都能够成功开展社区参与和社区参与研究。我们还发现,在疫情期间,有意义且真实的利益相关者参与的基本原则至关重要。通过虚拟方式,所有站点在新冠疫情期间保持社区参与方面都取得了相当大的成功。他们还利用现有的双向社区伙伴关系开展有意义且有影响力的研究。这包括新的新冠疫情社区参与研究以及维持先前非新冠疫情研究的创新方法。

结论

这些发现表明,学术 - 社区伙伴关系必须经过多年培育和维持,以便在出现此类危机时,所有伙伴都能基于现有的信任和相互尊重开展工作。吸取的经验教训以及开发的新工具和方法将是应对未来任何此类公共卫生紧急情况的关键。