Marsh Erica E, Kappelman Michael D, Kost Rhonda G, Mudd-Martin Gia, Shannon Jackilen, Stark Louisa A, Carrasquillo Olveen
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NCTraCS) Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;5(1):e104. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.785.
Prior to the COVID pandemic, many CTSAs employed face-to-face interactions to conduct most of their community engagement (CE) activities. During the COVID pandemic, such engagement had to be curtailed and alternatives needed to be formulated. In addition, Community Engaged Research (CEnR) teams refocused their efforts to address this public health crisis.
To obtain a general understanding of how CTSAs have conducted CE and CEnR during the COVID pandemic, we invited seven CTSA CE leaders to provide brief field reports of their activities during the pandemic. This included how their approaches to CE and CEnR were modified during the COVID-19 pandemic and key lessons learned.
We found that despite numerous challenges, all seven CTSAs CE cores were able to successfully carry out CE and CEnR. We also found that the fundamental principles of meaningful and authentic stakeholder engagement were of paramount importance during the pandemic. Through virtual approaches, all sites had considerable success in maintaining CE in during the COVID pandemic. They also leveraged existing bi-directional community partnerships to carry out meaningful and impactful research. This included both new COVID CEnR and also innovative approaches to sustain prior non-COVID research.
These findings suggest that academic-community partnerships must be fostered and sustained over the many years so that when such crises emerge, all partners can build on existing trust and mutual respect. The lessons learned and the new tools and approaches developed would be key in addressing any such future public health emergencies.
在新冠疫情之前,许多临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)项目通过面对面互动开展大部分社区参与(CE)活动。在新冠疫情期间,此类活动不得不缩减,需要制定替代方案。此外,社区参与研究(CEnR)团队重新调整工作重点以应对这一公共卫生危机。
为全面了解CTSA项目在新冠疫情期间如何开展社区参与和社区参与研究,我们邀请了七位CTSA社区参与负责人简要汇报他们在疫情期间的活动情况。这包括他们在新冠疫情期间社区参与和社区参与研究方法的调整以及吸取的主要经验教训。
我们发现,尽管面临诸多挑战,所有七个CTSA项目的社区参与核心都能够成功开展社区参与和社区参与研究。我们还发现,在疫情期间,有意义且真实的利益相关者参与的基本原则至关重要。通过虚拟方式,所有站点在新冠疫情期间保持社区参与方面都取得了相当大的成功。他们还利用现有的双向社区伙伴关系开展有意义且有影响力的研究。这包括新的新冠疫情社区参与研究以及维持先前非新冠疫情研究的创新方法。
这些发现表明,学术 - 社区伙伴关系必须经过多年培育和维持,以便在出现此类危机时,所有伙伴都能基于现有的信任和相互尊重开展工作。吸取的经验教训以及开发的新工具和方法将是应对未来任何此类公共卫生紧急情况的关键。