Wang Tongyao, Cheng Hongyan
School of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;15(4):533. doi: 10.3390/bs15040533.
Guided by family systems theory and the parenting process model, this study aimed to identify distinct profiles of parenting stress and examine their associations with parental characteristics, social-contextual factors, and child factors. A sample of 303 parents of preschool children (52.5% boys, mean child age = 61.17 months) from six urban kindergartens in southern and northern China participated in this study. Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified four distinct parenting stress profiles: the low parenting stress profile (12.9%), middle parenting stress profile (39.3%), high parenting stress profile (40.6%), and very high parenting stress profile (7.2%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that these profiles were significantly associated with parenting self-efficacy, the parent-grandparent co-parenting relationship, the co-parenting structure, family income, and the child's gender. These findings advance our understanding of the heterogeneity of parenting stress within Chinese parent-grandparent co-parenting families and offer theoretical and practical implications for future research and the development of targeted family support interventions.
在家庭系统理论和养育过程模型的指导下,本研究旨在识别养育压力的不同类型,并考察它们与父母特征、社会背景因素和儿童因素之间的关联。来自中国南方和北方六个城市幼儿园的303名学龄前儿童的家长(男孩占52.5%,儿童平均年龄为61.17个月)参与了本研究。潜在剖面分析(LPA)识别出四种不同的养育压力类型:低养育压力型(12.9%)、中等养育压力型(39.3%)、高养育压力型(40.6%)和极高养育压力型(7.2%)。多项逻辑回归分析表明,这些类型与养育自我效能感、父母与祖父母共同养育关系、共同养育结构、家庭收入以及儿童性别显著相关。这些发现增进了我们对中国父母与祖父母共同养育家庭中养育压力异质性的理解,并为未来研究以及针对性家庭支持干预措施的制定提供了理论和实践意义。