Masarik April S, Conger Rand D
Boise State University, USA.
University of California, Davis, USA.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 24.
In the present report, we provide an illustrative review of the Family Stress Model (FSM) framework [1] to understand how family stress influences children across development in physical, social-emotional, and cognitive domains. We note that the FSM as a theory has evolved through inspection of: (a) new explanatory pathways (mediators); (b) factors that moderate FSM pathways; and (c) joint tests of competing models. Also important, most researchers cited in this review used longitudinal designs to test the proposed causal ordering of FSM pathways, which replicated among a diverse set of families varied in structure, ethnic background, and geographic location. We encourage continued FSM scholarship with prevention and intervention efforts in mind.
在本报告中，我们对家庭压力模型（FSM）框架进行了示例性综述[1]，以了解家庭压力如何在身体、社会情感和认知领域影响儿童的整个发育过程。我们注意到，作为一种理论，家庭压力模型是通过以下方面的考察而发展起来的：（a）新的解释途径（中介因素）；（b）调节家庭压力模型途径的因素；以及（c）对相互竞争模型的联合检验。同样重要的是，本综述中引用的大多数研究人员采用纵向设计来检验家庭压力模型途径所提出的因果顺序，这些研究在结构、种族背景和地理位置各异的不同家庭中得到了重复验证。我们鼓励在考虑预防和干预措施的情况下继续开展家庭压力模型方面的学术研究。
