• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近端髋部骨折:髓腔宽度重要吗?

Proximal Hip Fracture: Does Canal Width Matter?

作者信息

Oulianski Maria, Sagi Amit, Rosinsky Philip, Bilenko Garrik, Avraham Dana, Lubovsky Omri

机构信息

Orthopedic Department, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot 7639302, Israel.

Orthopedic Department, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 7810000, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 17;14(8):2768. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082768.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14082768
PMID:40283598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12027712/
Abstract

: Proximal femur fractures are common in the older population and are related to bone quality. Our work evaluates bone parameters from pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs in patients with trochanteric and sub-capital fractures to determine if there are predictive morphology parameters for each fracture type. : Data from 237 medical records were extracted from patients who arrived at our hospital with trochanteric and sub-capital femoral fractures. Descriptive data and radiological evaluation of the calcar-to-canal ratio (CCR), cortical thickness index (CTI), and Dorr classification were measured by two observers and statistically evaluated. : A total of 202 patients were found to be eligible for the study. The mean patient age was 81.41 ± 7.27 years old. The mean age of the trochanteric group was significantly higher than that of the sub-capital group ( = 0.005). There were no statistically significant differences in gender and comorbidities. The CCR showed significance, but the CTI and Dorr classification did not show a significant difference ( = 0.001, = 0.78, and = 0.98). A high degree of reliability was shown for all measurements. The ICC for CTI and CCR was = 0.791 and = 0.770 ( < 0.001), and Cronbach's alpha was 0.815 and 0.796, respectively. Logistic regression was found to be significant in predicting 60.4% of correct forecasts with an odds ratio of 0.011 and 95% confidence interval ( = 0.001). For CTI, the correct forecasting rate was 48%, with an odds ratio of 0.615 ( = 0.78). : We found that, out of the measured parameters, the CCR stood out as important, showing that higher CCR levels are linked to an increased likelihood of trochanteric fractures.

摘要

股骨近端骨折在老年人群中很常见,且与骨质有关。我们的研究评估了转子间骨折和股骨头下骨折患者骨盆前后位(AP)X线片的骨参数,以确定每种骨折类型是否存在预测性形态学参数。:从我院收治的转子间和股骨头下股骨骨折患者的237份病历中提取数据。由两名观察者测量粗隆至髓腔比率(CCR)、皮质厚度指数(CTI)和Dorr分类的描述性数据及影像学评估,并进行统计学分析。:共发现202例患者符合研究条件。患者平均年龄为81.41±7.27岁。转子间组的平均年龄显著高于股骨头下组(P = 0.005)。性别和合并症方面无统计学显著差异。CCR显示出显著性,但CTI和Dorr分类未显示出显著差异(P = 0.001、P = 0.78和P = 0.98)。所有测量均显示出高度可靠性。CTI和CCR的组内相关系数(ICC)分别为0.791和0.770(P < 0.001),Cronbach's α系数分别为0.815和0.796。逻辑回归在预测正确结果方面具有显著性,预测正确率为60.4%,优势比为0.011,95%置信区间(P = 0.001)。对于CTI,正确预测率为48%,优势比为0.615(P = 0.78)。:我们发现在所测量的参数中,CCR最为重要,表明较高的CCR水平与转子间骨折可能性增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/7ddf1cfbd4f4/jcm-14-02768-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/7ad463d78574/jcm-14-02768-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/228861b1b680/jcm-14-02768-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/8f4daa089a96/jcm-14-02768-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/7ddf1cfbd4f4/jcm-14-02768-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/7ad463d78574/jcm-14-02768-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/228861b1b680/jcm-14-02768-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/8f4daa089a96/jcm-14-02768-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a929/12027712/7ddf1cfbd4f4/jcm-14-02768-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Proximal Hip Fracture: Does Canal Width Matter?近端髋部骨折:髓腔宽度重要吗?
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 17;14(8):2768. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082768.
2
Cortical Thickness Index and Canal Calcar Ratio: A Comparison of Proximal Femoral Fractures and Non-Fractured Femora in Octogenarians to Centenarians.皮质厚度指数与髓腔距比:八旬老人至百岁老人股骨近端骨折与未骨折股骨的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 8;13(4):981. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040981.
3
The Effect of Bone Morphology on Fracture Type and Treatment Result in Patients with Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Aged over 65 year.65 岁以上股骨转子间骨折患者的骨形态对骨折类型和治疗结果的影响。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Dec;28(12):1731-1738. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.57400.
4
Value of Proximal Femur Geometry in Predicting Occult Hip Fracture.股骨近端几何形状在预测隐匿性髋部骨折中的价值。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 11;59(11):1987. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111987.
5
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Quality Using 4 Radiographic Indexes: Canal Diaphysis Ratio Is Superior.使用 4 种影像学指标评估骨质量:管腔骨直径比更优。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Feb;39(2):427-432. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.037. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
Evaluation of the Relationship between Osteoporosis Parameters in Plain Hip Radiography and DXA Results in 156 Patients at a Single Center in Turkey.土耳其单中心156例患者髋部X线平片骨质疏松参数与双能X线吸收法结果的关系评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;13(15):2519. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152519.
7
Radiological parameter associated with the survival of old patients with hip fracture.与老年髋部骨折患者生存相关的放射学参数。
Injury. 2021 Nov;52(11):3388-3396. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.027. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Evaluation of cortical thickness and cortical thickness index in the proximal femur-CT, dual energy absorptiometry (DXA), trabecular bone score (TBS).股骨近端皮质厚度及皮质厚度指数的评估——计算机断层扫描(CT)、双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)、骨小梁评分(TBS)
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 27;20(2):e0312420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312420. eCollection 2025.
9
Is the cortical thickness index a valid parameter to assess bone mineral density in geriatric patients with hip fractures?皮质厚度指数是否是评估老年髋部骨折患者骨密度的有效参数?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):805-10. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2202-1. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
Comparative evaluation of radiographic morphologic parameters for predicting subsequent contralateral fragility hip fracture.比较影像学形态参数对预测同侧髋部脆性骨折的评估。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7):1837-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05789-8. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of transdisciplinary management of elderly with femur proximal extremity fracture: A patient-tailored plan from orthopaedics to rehabilitation.老年股骨近端骨折跨学科管理的优化:从骨科到康复的个体化患者计划。
World J Orthop. 2021 Jul 18;12(7):456-466. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i7.456.
2
No rest for elderly femur fracture patients: early surgery and early ambulation decrease mortality.老年股骨骨折患者不得休息:早期手术和早期活动可降低死亡率。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Aug 30;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00550-y.
3
Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities.
欧洲的脆性骨折:负担、管理和机会。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Apr 19;15(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y.
4
Bone Mass and Strength and Fall-Related Fractures in Older Age.老年人群的骨量、骨强度与跌倒相关骨折
J Osteoporos. 2019 Sep 9;2019:5134690. doi: 10.1155/2019/5134690. eCollection 2019.
5
Does hip morphology correlate with proximal femoral fracture type?髋关节形态与股骨近端骨折类型有关吗?
Hip Int. 2020 Sep;30(5):629-634. doi: 10.1177/1120700019859275. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Reproducibility of the Dorr classification and its quantitative indices on plain radiographs.平片 Dorr 分类及其定量指标的可重复性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.侧方跌倒致伤力及其对髋部骨折风险的影响:综述。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2759-2780. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4138-5. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
8
Role of cortical bone in hip fracture.皮质骨在髋部骨折中的作用。
Bonekey Rep. 2017 Jan 13;6:867. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2016.82. eCollection 2017.
9
Hip fractures in the elderly-: A Clinical Anatomy Review.老年人髋部骨折:临床解剖学综述
Clin Anat. 2017 Jan;30(1):89-97. doi: 10.1002/ca.22779. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
10
Comparison of morphological features in the femur between femoral neck fractures and femoral intertrochanteric fractures.股骨颈骨折与股骨转子间骨折在股骨形态学特征上的比较。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Sep;38(7):775-80. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1626-9. Epub 2016 Jan 22.