Trewin-Nybråten Cassia B, Leithe Sigrid, Paulsen Torbjørn, Langseth Hilde, Fortner Renée Turzanski
Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Gynecological Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Br J Cancer. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03018-0.
Residual disease (RD) following cytoreductive surgery is prognostic for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. Few studies have evaluated RD and survival by tumor histotype and across continuous RD diameter.
2608 individuals with stages III-IV invasive EOC diagnosed between 2013 and 2022 were identified using the Cancer Registry of Norway. In flexible parametric models, we compared excess mortality comparing RD versus no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD); systemic anti-cancer therapy was evaluated in a sub-cohort from 2019. Excess mortality was assessed across continuous RD size using restricted cubic splines.
Among 1849 patients with cytoreductive surgery, survival was worse for individuals with RD (vs. NMRD), excess hazard ratio (EHR) = 2.62 (95% confidence interval = (2.27-3.01)); no heterogeneity was observed by histotype (p = 0.21). Patients with 0.1-0.4 cm RD had 2-fold higher risk of death (EHR = 2.09 (1.63-2.68)) relative to women with NMRD; ~3-fold higher risk was observed for all other categories (e.g., 0.5-0.9 cm, EHR = 2.97 (2.26-3.89); 3.0-20 cm, 2.75 (2.05-3.70)). No significant difference in three-year survival was observed across continuous RD diameter (p ≥ 0.17). NMRD was associated with better survival regardless of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Achieving NMRD resulted in the best survival outcomes. Among patients with RD, we observed no significant difference in survival by RD diameter.
减瘤手术后的残留病灶(RD)对上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者具有预后意义。很少有研究按肿瘤组织学类型和连续的RD直径评估RD与生存情况。
利用挪威癌症登记处确定了2013年至2022年间诊断为III-IV期浸润性EOC的2608名个体。在灵活参数模型中,我们比较了有RD与无肉眼可见残留病灶(NMRD)者的超额死亡率;在一个2019年的亚队列中评估了全身抗癌治疗。使用受限立方样条评估连续RD大小的超额死亡率。
在1849例接受减瘤手术的患者中,有RD者的生存情况较差(与NMRD相比),超额风险比(EHR)=2.62(95%置信区间=(2.27-3.01));未观察到组织学类型的异质性(p=0.21)。与NMRD的女性相比,RD为0.1-0.4 cm的患者死亡风险高2倍(EHR=2.09(1.63-2.68));所有其他类别(如0.5-0.9 cm,EHR=2.97(2.26-3.89);3.0-20 cm,2.75(2.05-3.70))观察到风险高约3倍。连续RD直径的三年生存率未观察到显著差异(p≥0.17)。无论新辅助化疗情况如何,NMRD均与更好的生存相关。
实现NMRD可带来最佳生存结果。在有RD的患者中,我们未观察到RD直径对生存有显著差异。