• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进国际指导与合作:对医疗保健科学领域早期职业研究人员的全球桥梁计划的评估

Fostering international mentorship and collaborations: evaluation of the Global Bridges program for early-career researchers in health care sciences.

作者信息

Johansson Hanna, Lindblom Sebastian, Timm Linda, Gardiner Paul A, Opava Christina H, Dohrn Ing-Mari

机构信息

Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels Allé 23, Huddinge, 14183, Sweden.

Karolinska University Hospital, Theme Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07153-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07153-3
PMID:40287673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12032714/
Abstract

The Strategic Research Area Health Care Science was funded by the Swedish government to build strong research environments in 2008. This was assigned to Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University. A major initiative was the development of the Global Bridges program at Karolinska Institutet. The aim was to support junior researchers through mentoring and fostering international networks within health care sciences, as well as provide opportunity for them to cultivate long-lasting international collaborations essential for their careers. As participants, junior researchers were given the opportunity to invite an international scholar to Stockholm for a one-week intensive program consisting of seminars, individual mentoring sessions, and workshops. The Global Bridges program was organized six times between 2013 and 2022 with 48 junior researchers (94% women) at Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University, and 37 international scholars (68% women) from different higher education institutions in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. In this study, we used a mixed-method parallel design to evaluate whether the Global Bridges program had reached its intended objectives. A web-survey was sent out to all participating junior researchers and invited scholars and yielded a response rate of 71% and 83% respectively. The results indicated support for the academic development of junior researchers and that the individual components of the program were useful. Additionally, several collaborations had developed, resulting in peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and research projects. However, more support was deemed necessary to foster long-lasting collaborations among junior researchers - invited scholar dyads.

摘要

战略研究领域医疗保健科学于2008年由瑞典政府资助,旨在打造强大的研究环境。该项目被分配给卡罗琳斯卡学院和于默奥大学。一项重要举措是在卡罗琳斯卡学院开展全球桥梁计划。其目的是通过指导和培育医疗保健科学领域的国际网络来支持初级研究人员,并为他们提供机会,培养对其职业生涯至关重要的长期国际合作关系。作为参与者,初级研究人员有机会邀请一位国际学者前往斯德哥尔摩,参加为期一周的密集项目,该项目包括研讨会、个人指导课程和工作坊。全球桥梁计划在2013年至2022年间组织了六次,卡罗琳斯卡学院和于默奥大学有48名初级研究人员(94%为女性)参与,来自非洲、亚洲、澳大利亚、欧洲和北美的不同高等教育机构的37名国际学者(68%为女性)参与其中。在本研究中,我们采用混合方法平行设计来评估全球桥梁计划是否实现了其预期目标。我们向所有参与的初级研究人员和受邀学者发送了网络调查问卷,回复率分别为71%和83%。结果表明该计划对初级研究人员的学术发展有支持作用,且计划的各个组成部分都很有用。此外,还形成了一些合作关系,产生了经过同行评审的出版物、会议报告和研究项目。然而,人们认为需要更多支持来促进初级研究人员与受邀学者二元组之间的长期合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/d71c063f4067/12909_2025_7153_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/27d0971689d3/12909_2025_7153_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/52205bc29efd/12909_2025_7153_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/d71c063f4067/12909_2025_7153_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/27d0971689d3/12909_2025_7153_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/52205bc29efd/12909_2025_7153_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ee/12032714/d71c063f4067/12909_2025_7153_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fostering international mentorship and collaborations: evaluation of the Global Bridges program for early-career researchers in health care sciences.促进国际指导与合作:对医疗保健科学领域早期职业研究人员的全球桥梁计划的评估
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07153-3.
2
Independent investigator incubator (I): a comprehensive mentorship program to jumpstart productive research careers for junior faculty.独立研究员孵化器(I):一个全面的指导计划,旨在为初级教员启动多产的研究事业。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1290-3.
3
Training Mentor-Mentee Pairs to Build a Robust Culture for Mentorship and a Pipeline of Clinical and Translational Researchers: The Colorado Mentoring Training Program.培训导师-学员对子,以建立强大的指导文化和临床及转化研究人员的管道:科罗拉多州指导培训计划。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):730-736. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003152.
4
Career Development Institute with Enhanced Mentoring: A Revisit.加强指导的职业发展研究所:再探讨
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;40(3):424-8. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0362-5. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
5
A Mentoring Network for Diversity in Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research.口腔、牙齿和颅面研究多样性导师网络。
J Dent Res. 2024 Nov;103(12):1167-1172. doi: 10.1177/00220345241265664. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
6
International online mentorship for translational researchers.国际转化医学研究人员在线指导。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06107-5.
7
A structured approach to effective mentoring of women health researchers in Africa.一种在非洲有效指导女性健康研究人员的结构化方法。
Ghana Med J. 2022 Sep;56(3 Suppl):13-21. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v56i3s.3.
8
A Multifaceted Mentoring Program for Junior Faculty in Academic Pediatrics.一项针对学术儿科学初级教员的多方面指导计划。
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;28(3):320-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1153476. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
A new Mentor Evaluation Tool: Evidence of validity.新导师评估工具:有效性证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 16;15(6):e0234345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234345. eCollection 2020.
10
Development and initial results of a mandatory department of surgery faculty mentoring pilot program.外科系强制教员指导试点项目的开展与初步成果
J Surg Res. 2016 Sep;205(1):234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.048. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
11 reasons why we've stayed in academia.我们留在学术界的11个原因。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8003):453-454. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00724-2.
2
Ten simple rules for establishing a mentorship programme.建立指导计划的 10 个简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 May 12;18(5):e1010015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010015. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Demystifying mentorship: Tips for successfully navigating the mentor-mentee journey.揭开指导的神秘面纱:成功驾驭导师-学员关系之旅的小贴士。
Am J Hum Biol. 2022 Feb;34 Suppl 1:e23690. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23690. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.学术界的性别偏见:一个需要解决的终身问题。
Neuron. 2021 Jul 7;109(13):2047-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.
5
Postdocs in crisis: science cannot risk losing the next generation.博士后陷入危机:科学界不能冒险失去下一代。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7824):160. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02541-9.
6
An investigation of self-efficacy crossover between mentors and protégés within mentoring dyads.导师与被指导者之间的自我效能感交叉研究。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Jan;1483(1):80-97. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14324. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
Benefits, barriers and enablers of mentoring female health academics: An integrative review.促进女性健康学术人员发展的相关因素:一项整合性回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 18;14(4):e0215319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215319. eCollection 2019.
8
United States National Postdoc Survey results and the interaction of gender, career choice and mentor impact.美国博士后调查结果以及性别、职业选择和导师影响的相互作用。
Elife. 2018 Dec 18;7:e40189. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40189.
9
Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base.混合方法研究:扩大证据基础。
Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jul;20(3):74-75. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102699. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
10
Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature.影响博士后临床学者职业发展的因素:文献综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 21;6(10):e013523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013523.