Sostre C F, Flournoy J G, Bova J G, Goldstein H M, Schenker S
Dig Dis Sci. 1985 Oct;30(10):918-27. doi: 10.1007/BF01308290.
The clinical course of 19 patients with pancreatic phlegmon, as diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) and clinical criteria, was assessed retrospectively and compared to that of eight patients with pancreatic abscess diagnosed either at surgery or with percutaneous aspiration. Controls consisted of 55 patients with uncomplicated acute pancreatitis without CT scans and 11 patients with acute pancreatitis in whom CT scans were negative or only consistent with acute pancreatitis (no phlegmon). The age, sex, and presumed etiology of the pancreatitis were not significantly different in the four groups. Patients with phlegmon had a higher incidence of severe pancreatitis as defined by Ranson's criteria, presence of an abdominal mass, as well as a longer duration of fever, abdominal pain and leukocytosis than controls without CT scans. With the exception of a palpable abdominal mass and fever lasting over five days, the results were similar when comparing the phlegmon group and controls with CT scans, although the severity of the disease and prolonged abdominal pain tended to be increased in the former patients. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical or laboratory criteria between the phlegmon and abscess groups, although the latter group had longer hospital stays and periods with no oral intake (npo). Management of patients with phlegmon tended to include TPN, longer npo periods, antibiotics, and longer hospital stay than in controls without CT scans. Controls with CT scans were managed similarly to the phlegmon group because of prolonged amylase elevation and abdominal pain. Percutaneous aspiration was successful in differentiating abscess from phlegmon in five of six cases. Major complications were rare in the phlegmon group and spontaneous resolution was the rule. Pancreatic phlegmon is a distinct clinical/radiologic entity which may be very difficult to differentiate clinically from pancreatic abscess. Early percutaneous thin-needle aspiration of the inflammatory mass (under CT guidance) seems to be the diagnostic procedure of choice. Management is nonsurgical unless complications arise. The role of TPN and antibiotics is unknown, and controlled studies of these therapeutic approaches in pancreatic phlegmon are needed.
回顾性评估了19例经计算机断层扫描(CT)和临床标准诊断为胰腺蜂窝织炎患者的临床病程,并与8例经手术或经皮穿刺确诊为胰腺脓肿的患者进行了比较。对照组包括55例无并发症的急性胰腺炎且未行CT扫描的患者,以及11例CT扫描阴性或仅符合急性胰腺炎(无蜂窝织炎)的急性胰腺炎患者。四组患者的年龄、性别及推测的胰腺炎病因无显著差异。与未行CT扫描的对照组相比,蜂窝织炎患者符合兰森标准的重症胰腺炎发生率更高,存在腹部肿块,发热、腹痛及白细胞增多的持续时间更长。除了可触及的腹部肿块和持续超过5天的发热外,蜂窝织炎组与行CT扫描的对照组比较结果相似,尽管前一组患者疾病的严重程度和腹痛持续时间有增加趋势。蜂窝织炎组和脓肿组在临床或实验室标准方面无统计学显著差异,尽管后一组患者住院时间更长且禁食时间更长。与未行CT扫描的对照组相比,蜂窝织炎患者的治疗往往包括全胃肠外营养(TPN)、更长的禁食期、抗生素及更长的住院时间。由于淀粉酶持续升高和腹痛,行CT扫描的对照组治疗方式与蜂窝织炎组相似。六例中有五例经皮穿刺成功鉴别了脓肿与蜂窝织炎。蜂窝织炎组主要并发症罕见,通常可自行缓解。胰腺蜂窝织炎是一种独特的临床/放射学实体,临床上可能很难与胰腺脓肿相鉴别。早期在CT引导下对炎性肿块进行经皮细针穿刺似乎是首选的诊断方法。除非出现并发症,否则无需手术治疗。TPN和抗生素的作用尚不清楚,需要对这些治疗方法在胰腺蜂窝织炎中的应用进行对照研究。