Suppr超能文献

腰椎间盘突出症行腰椎显微椎间盘切除术与开放式椎间盘切除术的成功率及并发症的对比分析

Comparative analysis of success rates and complications between lumbar microdiscectomy and open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

作者信息

Khan Zahid, Sharafat Seema, Ali Haider

机构信息

Zahid Khan, FCPS, MTI, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan.

Seema Sharafat, FCPS, MTI, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):992-996. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.10620.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the success rates and complications associated with lumbar microdiscectomy compared to open discectomy from a tertiary care hospital perspective.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Neurosurgery Department of Lady Reading Hospital over four years (January 2020 to December 2023). Inclusion criteria comprised patients of all genders and ages who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy or open discectomy. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients who underwent redo surgeries, or had incomplete data.

RESULTS

In the study, 396 patients were enrolled, with 153 undergoing open discectomy and 243 undergoing microdiscectomy. The mean age of the participants was 40.42±11.49 years. Noteworthy findings from the analysis include that the success rates were 77.8% for open discectomy and 86.8% for microdiscectomy (p=0.050), while complications, specifically discitis, occurred in 2.6% of open discectomy patients and 0.4% of microdiscectomy patients (p=0.025).

CONCLUSION

Microdiscectomy exhibited higher success rates and lower complication rates than open discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation, underscoring its potential as a preferred surgical intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从三级医疗医院的角度评估与开放式椎间盘切除术相比,腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的成功率及相关并发症。

方法

在莱迪德英医院神经外科进行了为期四年(2020年1月至2023年12月)的回顾性分析。纳入标准包括所有性别和年龄的接受单节段腰椎显微椎间盘切除术或开放式椎间盘切除术的患者。排除标准包括接受再次手术或数据不完整的患者。

结果

本研究共纳入396例患者,其中153例行开放式椎间盘切除术,243例行显微椎间盘切除术。参与者的平均年龄为40.42±11.49岁。分析的显著发现包括,开放式椎间盘切除术的成功率为77.8%,显微椎间盘切除术的成功率为86.8%(p=0.050),而并发症,特别是椎间盘炎,在开放式椎间盘切除术患者中的发生率为2.6%,在显微椎间盘切除术患者中的发生率为0.4%(p=0.025)。

结论

对于单节段腰椎间盘突出症,显微椎间盘切除术比开放式椎间盘切除术具有更高的成功率和更低的并发症发生率,突出了其作为首选手术干预的潜力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
[Acute low back pain--assessment and management].[急性腰痛——评估与管理]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2008 Jan 23;97(2):58-68. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157.97.2.58.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验