• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任的微妙平衡:员工的预期信任和感知信任如何影响印象管理。

The subtle balance of trust: how employees' expected and perceived trust influence impression management.

作者信息

Zhang MinMin, Ma Xiaodong

机构信息

The Army Infantry College of PLA, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1526860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526860. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526860
PMID:40290547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12021864/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examines how employees expected and perceived trust influence impression management strategies, focusing on their interplay in shaping pro-social and self-oriented behaviors. Trust is pivotal in organizations, yet research has overlooked the impact of trust mismatches on impression management. Addressing this gap, we analyze the effects of trust congruence and explore behavioral variations under different trust combinations.

METHODS

Using a quantitative approach, we analyze survey data from employees across various enterprises. To test the hypotheses, we first conducted polynomial regression analysis, followed by response surface analysis. The primary polynomial regression aims to test the hypotheses of ascendant ridge, consistency, and asymmetry, further revealing the complex relationships between the variables.

RESULTS

Trust congruence fosters pro-social impression management and curtails self-oriented behaviors. Higher trust levels correlate positively with pro-social behaviors. Notably, trust incongruence has asymmetric effects: employees with high expected but low perceived trust resort to self-oriented strategies, while those with low expected but high perceived trust exhibit stronger pro-social tendencies.

DISCUSSION

These findings highlight the need to promote trust congruence in management. Addressing trust misalignment through tailored strategies, such as enhancing communication and support, can foster constructive behaviors. Future research should explore trust dynamics and moderating organizational factors like leadership and culture. This study advances understanding of workplace trust and offers practical insights for management.

摘要

引言

本研究探讨员工预期信任和感知信任如何影响印象管理策略,重点关注它们在塑造亲社会行为和自我导向行为方面的相互作用。信任在组织中至关重要,但研究忽视了信任不匹配对印象管理的影响。为填补这一空白,我们分析了信任一致性的影响,并探讨了不同信任组合下的行为差异。

方法

采用定量方法,我们分析了来自不同企业员工的调查数据。为检验假设,我们首先进行了多项式回归分析,随后进行了响应面分析。主要的多项式回归旨在检验上升脊、一致性和不对称性假设,进一步揭示变量之间的复杂关系。

结果

信任一致性促进亲社会印象管理并减少自我导向行为。更高的信任水平与亲社会行为呈正相关。值得注意的是,信任不一致具有不对称影响:预期信任高但感知信任低的员工会采取自我导向策略,而预期信任低但感知信任高的员工表现出更强的亲社会倾向。

讨论

这些发现凸显了在管理中促进信任一致性的必要性。通过量身定制的策略,如加强沟通和支持来解决信任失调问题,可以促进建设性的行为。未来的研究应探索信任动态以及领导和文化等调节组织因素。本研究增进了对职场信任的理解,并为管理提供了实用的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7169/12021864/b1e08237b45c/fpsyg-16-1526860-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7169/12021864/a5862e0c0a90/fpsyg-16-1526860-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7169/12021864/b1e08237b45c/fpsyg-16-1526860-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7169/12021864/a5862e0c0a90/fpsyg-16-1526860-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7169/12021864/b1e08237b45c/fpsyg-16-1526860-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The subtle balance of trust: how employees' expected and perceived trust influence impression management.信任的微妙平衡:员工的预期信任和感知信任如何影响印象管理。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1526860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526860. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of organizational health-oriented strategies on employees' job performance, perceived medical mistrust as a moderator: A COVID-19 perception-based view.组织健康导向策略对员工工作绩效的影响,感知医疗不信任作为调节因素:基于 COVID-19 认知的观点。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;10:946946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946946. eCollection 2022.
3
How does job insecurity cause unethical pro-organizational behavior? The mediating role of impression management motivation and the moderating role of organizational identification.工作不安全感如何导致不道德的亲组织行为?印象管理动机的中介作用和组织认同的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 23;13:941650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941650. eCollection 2022.
4
How could fit between polychronicity and multitasking shape employees' self-leadership? The moderating role of AI-empowered task processing.多元时间观念与多任务处理之间的契合度如何塑造员工的自我领导能力?人工智能赋能任务处理的调节作用。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jan 28;8:1451944. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1451944. eCollection 2025.
5
The Effect of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on Employees' Organisational Citizenship Behaviour for the Environment: A Moderated Mediation Model.自我牺牲型领导对员工环境组织公民行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127450.
6
The Effects of Leaders' Prosocial Orientation on Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior - The Roles of Affective Commitment and Workplace Ostracism.领导者亲社会导向对员工组织公民行为的影响——情感承诺与职场排斥的作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Aug 6;14:1171-1185. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S324081. eCollection 2021.
7
Feeling Trusted or Feeling Used? The Relationship Between Perceived Leader Trust, Reciprocation Wariness, and Proactive Behavior.感到被信任还是被利用?领导者信任感知、回报警惕与主动行为之间的关系。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Sep 22;14:1461-1472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S328458. eCollection 2021.
8
Influence of Self-Sacrificial Leadership on the Pro-Organizational Unethical Behavior of Employees: A Moderated Mediating Model.自我牺牲型领导对员工亲组织不道德行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 30;14:2245-2255. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S339718. eCollection 2021.
9
Just What I See? Implications of Congruence Between Supervisors' and Employees' Perceptions of Pay Justice for Employees' Work-Related Attitudes and Behaviors.我所看到的究竟是什么?主管与员工对薪酬公平性的认知一致性对员工工作相关态度和行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2069. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02069. eCollection 2020.
10
Understanding the Impact of Environmentally Specific Servant Leadership on Employees' Pro-Environmental Behaviors in the Workplace: Based on the Proactive Motivation Model.理解环境特定的仆人式领导对员工工作场所环保行为的影响:基于主动动机模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010567.

本文引用的文献

1
The Moderating Effects of Trust and Felt Trust on the Nonlinear Relationship Between Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive Work Behavior.信任和感知信任对义务性公民行为与反生产工作行为之间非线性关系的调节作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 5;16:2517-2531. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S413674. eCollection 2023.
2
Impression Management and Career Related Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review.印象管理与职业相关成果:一项系统的文献综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 30;12:701694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701694. eCollection 2021.
3
The Effects of Leaders' Prosocial Orientation on Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior - The Roles of Affective Commitment and Workplace Ostracism.
领导者亲社会导向对员工组织公民行为的影响——情感承诺与职场排斥的作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Aug 6;14:1171-1185. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S324081. eCollection 2021.
4
Cubic response surface analysis: Investigating asymmetric and level-dependent congruence effects with third-order polynomial models.三次方响应面分析:用三阶多项式模型研究非对称和水平依赖的一致性效应。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Aug;27(4):622-649. doi: 10.1037/met0000352. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
On the relation between felt trust and actual trust: Examining pathways to and implications of leader trust meta-accuracy.从感知信任和实际信任的关系看:领导者信任元准确性的影响和实现路径。
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Sep;105(9):994-1012. doi: 10.1037/apl0000474. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Impression Management and Interview and Job Performance Ratings: A Meta-Analysis of Research Design with Tactics in Mind.印象管理与面试及工作绩效评级:一项考虑策略的研究设计元分析
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 15;8:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00201. eCollection 2017.
7
Choosing where to work at work - towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices.工作时选择工作地点——构建基于活动的灵活办公场所利弊的理论模型
Ergonomics. 2017 Apr;60(4):467-486. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
8
Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.信任与团队绩效:主效应、调节变量和协变量的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1134-50. doi: 10.1037/apl0000110. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance.基于认知和基于情感的信任作为领导行为对团队绩效影响的中介。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):863-71. doi: 10.1037/a0022625.
10
Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness.任务可行吗?具有亲社会动机的员工的表现取决于管理者的可信度。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):927-44. doi: 10.1037/a0014391.