基础实验心理学简单世界背后隐藏的复杂性:运用实验方法获取心理学知识的主要及实际局限。
The hidden complexity of the simple world of basic experimental psychology: the principal and practical limits of gaining psychological knowledge using the experimental method.
作者信息
Kuhbandner Christof, Mayrhofer Roland
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 11;15:1397553. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397553. eCollection 2024.
Basic experimental research in psychology is based on the assumption that law-like behavior can be observed if the complexity of the human psyche is reduced by the creation of experimental settings in which simple psychical phenomena occur which reflect the effect of an isolated psychological mechanism. However, we show that this assumption does not hold for many phenomena studied in basic experimental psychology because even phenomena that are regarded as simple and fully controllable often fluctuate unpredictably as a function of unintentionally chosen details of the experimental setting. The reason is that in a complex system like the human psyche, even minimal, and from the perspective of the investigated research question irrelevant, differences in the experimental setting can build up to large unsystematic effects. Law-like behavior in experiments could only occur if truly low-level mechanisms were studied in a truly isolated way. However, this is often not the case in current experimental research. One problem is that often fuzzy theoretical terms are used which only give the impression that low-level mechanisms are being investigated, although in reality the complexity of the human psyche is unintentionally brought on board. Another problem is that, unlike in the natural sciences, the mechanisms of the human psyche can only be isolated from each other to a limited extent because the human psyche always reacts as a whole system. If such problems could be overcome, meaningful knowledge could be gained through experimental psychological research. However, the knowledge gained is very limited in terms of its explanatory power for human behavior, as it is only helpful for understanding a very specific aspect of behavior, namely the mechanistic functioning of isolated low-level mechanisms. When it comes to understanding motivated behavior in real life, knowledge about the non-mechanistic functioning of the higher levels of the human psyche is necessary, but this knowledge cannot be gained through the experimental method.
心理学的基础实验研究基于这样一种假设
如果通过创建实验环境来降低人类心理的复杂性,在这种环境中会出现反映孤立心理机制作用的简单心理现象,那么就可以观察到类似规律的行为。然而,我们表明,这一假设对于基础实验心理学中研究的许多现象并不成立,因为即使是那些被视为简单且完全可控的现象,也常常会根据实验环境中无意选择的细节而不可预测地波动。原因在于,在像人类心理这样的复杂系统中,即使是最小的、从所研究的研究问题角度来看无关紧要的实验环境差异,也可能累积成巨大的非系统性影响。只有在以真正孤立的方式研究真正低级的机制时,实验中的类似规律行为才会出现。然而,在当前的实验研究中情况往往并非如此。一个问题是,经常使用模糊的理论术语,这只会给人一种正在研究低级机制的印象,尽管实际上人类心理的复杂性被无意地引入了。另一个问题是,与自然科学不同,人类心理的机制只能在有限程度上相互分离,因为人类心理总是作为一个整体系统做出反应。如果能够克服这些问题,就可以通过实验心理学研究获得有意义的知识。然而,所获得的知识在解释人类行为方面的能力非常有限,因为它只有助于理解行为的一个非常特定的方面,即孤立的低级机制的机械运作。在理解现实生活中的动机行为时,需要关于人类心理较高层次的非机械运作的知识,但这种知识无法通过实验方法获得。