Department of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 May;17(3):852-862. doi: 10.1177/17456916211026947. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
The ideal experiment in physics must be conceptual, cunning, and conclusive. Adoption of these same standards in psychology has led to experiments that are uninformative and frivolous. We explain why we believe that psychology is fundamentally incompatible with hypothesis-driven theoretical science and conclude that this erodes the logic behind recent proposals to improve psychological research, such as stricter statistical standards, preregistration, and replication. The failure of psychology is not that it is somehow insufficiently scientific but rather that it makes inordinate use of methods that are a mismatch for the aspirations of researchers in the field, at the expense of valuable empirical research.
物理学中的理想实验必须具有概念性、巧妙性和结论性。在心理学中采用这些相同的标准,导致了那些无信息和琐碎的实验。我们解释了为什么我们认为心理学从根本上与假设驱动的理论科学不兼容,并得出结论,这削弱了最近提出的改进心理学研究的建议背后的逻辑,例如更严格的统计标准、预先注册和复制。心理学的失败不是因为它在某种程度上不够科学,而是因为它过度使用了不适合该领域研究人员愿望的方法,牺牲了有价值的实证研究。