• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复制危机已经带来了积极的结构、程序和社区变革。

The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes.

作者信息

Korbmacher Max, Azevedo Flavio, Pennington Charlotte R, Hartmann Helena, Pownall Madeleine, Schmidt Kathleen, Elsherif Mahmoud, Breznau Nate, Robertson Olly, Kalandadze Tamara, Yu Shijun, Baker Bradley J, O'Mahony Aoife, Olsnes Jørgen Ø-S, Shaw John J, Gjoneska Biljana, Yamada Yuki, Röer Jan P, Murphy Jennifer, Alzahawi Shilaan, Grinschgl Sandra, Oliveira Catia M, Wingen Tobias, Yeung Siu Kit, Liu Meng, König Laura M, Albayrak-Aydemir Nihan, Lecuona Oscar, Micheli Leticia, Evans Thomas

机构信息

Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

NORMENT Centre for Psychosis Research, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Commun Psychol. 2023 Jul 25;1(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2.

DOI:10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2
PMID:39242883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11290608/
Abstract

The emergence of large-scale replication projects yielding successful rates substantially lower than expected caused the behavioural, cognitive, and social sciences to experience a so-called 'replication crisis'. In this Perspective, we reframe this 'crisis' through the lens of a credibility revolution, focusing on positive structural, procedural and community-driven changes. Second, we outline a path to expand ongoing advances and improvements. The credibility revolution has been an impetus to several substantive changes which will have a positive, long-term impact on our research environment.

摘要

大规模复制项目的成功率大幅低于预期,这使得行为科学、认知科学和社会科学经历了一场所谓的“复制危机”。在这篇观点文章中,我们从可信度革命的角度重新审视这场“危机”,重点关注积极的结构性、程序性以及社区驱动的变革。其次,我们勾勒出一条扩大现有进展和改进的路径。可信度革命推动了若干实质性变革,这些变革将对我们的研究环境产生积极、长期的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260e/11290608/fdb16abfea5e/44271_2023_3_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260e/11290608/fdb16abfea5e/44271_2023_3_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260e/11290608/fdb16abfea5e/44271_2023_3_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes.复制危机已经带来了积极的结构、程序和社区变革。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Jul 25;1(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2.
2
Beyond 'significance': principles and practice of the Analysis of Credibility.超越“显著性”:可信度分析的原则与实践
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jan 17;5(1):171047. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171047. eCollection 2018 Jan.
3
Reckoning With Our Crisis: An Agenda for the Field of Social and Personality Psychology.正视我们的危机:社会与人格心理学领域的议程。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 May;18(3):710-722. doi: 10.1177/17456916221101060. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Why Has Personality Psychology Played an Outsized Role in the Credibility Revolution?为何人格心理学在可信性革命中发挥了超乎寻常的作用?
Personal Sci. 2021;2. doi: 10.5964/ps.6001. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Understanding and tackling the reproducibility crisis - Why we need to study scientists' trust in data.理解并解决可重复性危机——为什么我们需要研究科学家对数据的信任。
Pharmacol Res. 2024 Jan;199:107043. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.107043. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme.各学术领域的复制率是否相同?来自美国国防部高级研究计划局(DARPA)SCORE项目的群体预测。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jul 22;7(7):200566. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200566. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Furthering racial liberalism in UK higher education: The populist construction of the 'free speech crisis'.推进英国高等教育中的种族自由主义:“言论自由危机”的民粹主义构建。
Br J Sociol. 2024 Sep;75(4):636-649. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13119. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
8
Probabilistic forecasting of replication studies.复制研究的概率预测。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0231416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231416. eCollection 2020.
9
What can we expect of police in the face of deficient mental health systems? Qualitative insights from Chicago police officers.面对心理健康系统的不足,我们能对警察抱有什么期望?来自芝加哥警察的定性见解。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;28(1):28-42. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12691. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
10
The "'Crisis' Crisis" in psychology.心理学中的“危机”危机。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 10;45:e28. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21000364.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.编辑对科学中的信任和诚信的承诺:对疼痛与麻醉学研究的影响
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 12;6:1653869. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1653869. eCollection 2025.
2
A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others.对视觉搜索和眼动文献的共享实践回顾为我们这个领域及其他领域提供了建议。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 25;57(9):235. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02759-3.
3
The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science.

本文引用的文献

1
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science.社会科学期刊编辑向开放科学过渡指南。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Feb 16;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5.
2
Prioritizing open science in space medicine: perspectives following the NASA "Transform to Open Science (TOPS)" Curriculum.优先考虑空间医学中的开放科学:美国宇航局“转型为开放科学(TOPS)”课程后的观点。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Jun;193(3):1683-1685. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03612-w. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
Social and moral psychology of COVID-19 across 69 countries.
复制数据库:记录心理科学的可复制性。
J Open Psychol Data. 2024 Sep 11;12:8. doi: 10.5334/jopd.101. eCollection 2024.
4
Can I trust this paper?我能信任这篇论文吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02740-3.
5
Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anaesthesiology research.编辑对科学中的信任和诚信的承诺:对疼痛与麻醉学研究的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002237.
6
Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: Implications for pain and anesthesiology research.编辑对科学中的信任与诚信的承诺:对疼痛与麻醉学研究的影响。
Can J Pain. 2025 Jul 10;9(1):2506941. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2025.2506941. eCollection 2025.
7
Editorial Commitment to Trust and Integrity in Science: Implications for Pain and Anesthesiology Research.编辑对科学中的信任与诚信的承诺:对疼痛与麻醉学研究的启示
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 1;18:3309-3316. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S381164. eCollection 2025.
8
Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anesthesiology research.编辑对科学中信任与诚信的承诺:对疼痛与麻醉学研究的影响
Pain Rep. 2025 Jul 2;10(4):e1303. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001303. eCollection 2025 Aug.
9
Transparency in epidemiological analyses of cohort data a case study of the Norwegian mother, father, and child cohort study (MoBa).队列数据流行病学分析中的透明度——以挪威母婴队列研究(MoBa)为例
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02601-6.
10
Editorial commitment to trust and integrity in science: implications for pain and anaesthesiology research.编辑对科学中的信任与诚信的承诺:对疼痛与麻醉学研究的影响
Anaesthesia. 2025 Sep;80(9):1032-1039. doi: 10.1111/anae.16655. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
COVID-19 的社会和道德心理学:来自 69 个国家的研究。
Sci Data. 2023 May 11;10(1):272. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02080-8.
4
'Big team' science challenges us to reconsider authorship.“大团队”科学促使我们重新思考作者身份。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 May;7(5):665-667. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01572-2.
5
Reporting and interpreting non-significant results in animal cognition research.动物认知研究中非显著结果的报告和解释。
PeerJ. 2023 Mar 9;11:e14963. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14963. eCollection 2023.
6
The Psychological Science Accelerator's COVID-19 rapid-response dataset.心理科学加速的 COVID-19 快速反应数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 11;10(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01811-7.
7
Raising the value of research studies in psychological science by increasing the credibility of research reports: the transparent Psi project.通过提高研究报告的可信度来提升心理科学研究的价值:透明的Psi项目。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 1;10(2):191375. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191375. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process.通过 repliCATS(可信赖科学的协作评估)过程进行结构化专家 elicitation 预测可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0274429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274429. eCollection 2023.
9
Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty.观察到许多研究人员使用相同的数据和假设,揭示了一个隐藏的不确定宇宙。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2203150119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203150119. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
10
A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration.多微笑合作组织对面部反馈假说的多实验室测试。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1731-1742. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01458-9. Epub 2022 Oct 20.