Suppr超能文献

青少年非侵入性脑刺激中背外侧前额叶皮层的定位:BeamF3与10-20脑电图系统的比较:一项横断面研究。

Localizing dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for noninvasive brain stimulation in adolescents: A comparison between BeamF3 and 10-20 EEG systems: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Atmaram Sakhardande Kasturi, Pathak Harsh, Manohar Harshini, Sreeraj Vanteemar S, Venkatasubramanian Ganesan, Kommu John Vijay Sagar

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;67(3):346-349. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_972_24. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders. It is a primary target region for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS). BeamF3 is a simplified method of localization of DLPFC for neuromodulation. However, the accuracy of this method has not been examined in children.

AIM

To compare the localization of DLPFC via BeamF3 and 10-20 electroencephalogram (EEG) systems in adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders.

METHODS

Twenty adolescents (10-15 years) were recruited from the in-patient child and adolescent psychiatry unit of our center. DLPFC localization was done and compared between the BeamF3 and 10-20 EEG systems. DLPFC localization based on the BeamF3 method at anterior/anterolateral/lateral position was compared with 10-20 EEG systems in 70% of adolescents.

RESULTS

The mean difference in DLPFC localization was 1.10 ± 0.81 cm (0-3 cm), with a difference of ≥1 cm in 70% of adolescents. This study found a difference between Beam F3 and 10-20 EEG systems in terms of localization of DLPFC in adolescents.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of these methods with MRI-guided methods may be necessary, especially when highly focal stimulation is desired for treatment in adolescents.

摘要

背景

背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)与神经精神疾病有关。它是无创脑刺激(NIBS)的主要目标区域。BeamF3是一种用于神经调节的DLPFC简化定位方法。然而,该方法在儿童中的准确性尚未得到检验。

目的

比较神经精神疾病青少年中通过BeamF3和10-20脑电图(EEG)系统对DLPFC的定位。

方法

从我们中心的儿童和青少年精神科住院部招募了20名青少年(10-15岁)。对DLPFC进行定位,并在BeamF3和10-20 EEG系统之间进行比较。在70%的青少年中,将基于BeamF3方法在前部/前外侧/外侧位置的DLPFC定位与10-20 EEG系统进行比较。

结果

DLPFC定位的平均差异为1.10±0.81厘米(0-3厘米),70%的青少年差异≥1厘米。本研究发现Beam F3和10-20 EEG系统在青少年DLPFC定位方面存在差异。

结论

可能有必要将这些方法与MRI引导的方法进行比较,特别是当希望对青少年进行高度局部刺激治疗时。

相似文献

1
Localizing dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for noninvasive brain stimulation in adolescents: A comparison between BeamF3 and 10-20 EEG systems: A cross-sectional study.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;67(3):346-349. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_972_24. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
3
Comparison of Site Localization Techniques for Brain Stimulation.
J ECT. 2019 Jun;35(2):127-132. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000537.
5
Exploring the optimal site for the localization of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in brain stimulation experiments.
Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
6
Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS: 10-20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation.
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2018 Apr 30;274:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
8
Top-down control of vestibular inputs by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Dec;241(11-12):2845-2853. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06722-6. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and young people with psychiatric disorders: a systematic review.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;33(9):3003-3023. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02157-0. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
2
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 May 25;16:893955. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.893955. eCollection 2022.
4
Developing growth reference charts for the head circumference of Pakistani children aged 6 to 18 years.
Turk J Pediatr. 2022;64(2):293-301. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2020.1714.
5
Efficacy of neurostimulation across mental disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of 208 randomized controlled trials.
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;27(6):2709-2719. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01524-8. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Subregions of DLPFC Display Graded yet Distinct Structural and Functional Connectivity.
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 13;42(15):3241-3252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1216-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(1):260-275. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Targeting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: do we really know what we are stimulating and how best to do it?
Brain Stimul. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Effects of Non-invasive Neurostimulation on Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review.
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020 Nov 30;18(4):527-552. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.4.527.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验