Hellbrecht Irma, Könsgen Nadja, Weise Alina, Schlumberger Fabian, Pieper Dawid, Breuing Jessica
Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Rüdersdorf, Germany.
PEC Innov. 2025 Apr 8;6:100391. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100391. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Our aim was to provide a descriptive analysis of the content and quality of bariatric apps available in Germany.
From November 2022 to February 2023, apps available in German used in pre- or postoperative care were searched in the Google Play, the Apple App Store, and the Register for Digital Health Applications (DHA). One author reviewed titles and summary pages. Relevant apps were downloaded and two authors assessed their eligibility. Additionally, the authors independently screened records indexed in Medline/Embase. Besides a summary of the app content, a quality assessment was performed using two checklists (the Action Alliance for Patient Safety Checklist (APS); the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).
38 potentially relevant apps were identified, = 3 were included. Functionality was good (MARS score 13-18/20). Content quality was variable (MARS score 7-19/35). Moreover, the apps' content lacked references and varied in scope.
There are few apps in the field of BS available and the quality of their content is moderate to low. The evidence base remains unclear due to a lack of sources.
This is the first structured assessment of bariatric apps in Germany using validated checklists. The results provide a foundation for evidence-based, patient-centered app development in bariatric care and thus represent an important digital innovation in this field.
我们的目的是对德国可用的减肥应用程序的内容和质量进行描述性分析。
从2022年11月到2023年2月,在谷歌Play、苹果应用商店和数字健康应用注册处(DHA)中搜索用于术前或术后护理的德语可用应用程序。一位作者查看了标题和摘要页面。下载了相关应用程序,两位作者评估了它们的适用性。此外,作者还独立筛选了Medline/Embase中索引的记录。除了对应用程序内容进行总结外,还使用两份清单(患者安全行动联盟清单(APS);移动应用评分量表(MARS))进行了质量评估。
确定了38个潜在相关应用程序,纳入了3个。功能良好(MARS评分13 - 18/20)。内容质量参差不齐(MARS评分7 - 19/35)。此外,应用程序的内容缺乏参考文献,范围也各不相同。
减肥领域的应用程序很少,其内容质量中等偏低。由于缺乏来源,证据基础仍不明确。
这是德国首次使用经过验证的清单对减肥应用程序进行结构化评估。研究结果为减肥护理中基于证据、以患者为中心的应用程序开发奠定了基础,因此代表了该领域一项重要的数字创新。