• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

战略记忆高级推理训练(SMART)疗法对提高高三学生职业选择的影响。

Effect of strategic memory advanced reasoning training (SMART) therapy for enhancing final-year high school students career choices.

作者信息

Mahmood Amir, Rehman Nadia, Huang Xiao, Zamani Noushin

机构信息

College of Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.

Joint Education Institute of Zhejiang Normal University and University of Kansas, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 28;13(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02767-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02767-0
PMID:40296108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036163/
Abstract

The SMART program improves students' memory, reasoning, and strategic thinking skills, crucial for academic success and career planning. This study explored the effect of Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART) for final-year high school students, aiming to enhance their decision-making abilities and prepare them for University. Based on the literature, nine hypotheses were developed with SMART program implementation therapy as an independent variable with four sub-variables: cognitive skills, professional development, social skills, and academic skills, and their impact on the dependent variable, such as career decision-making. Using a smart partial least square-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) on 284 high school students, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) was implemented to confirm the measurement model. Path analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Results of the study revealed that SMART therapy significantly enhances cognitive abilities, academic performance, personal development, and social skills, collectively contributing to better career decision-making among final-year high school students. However, the direct impact of SMART on career decision-making was not supported, indicating that additional factors, such as social and emotional influences, play a role. These findings suggest that integrating SMART therapy into high school curricula can better prepare students for future challenges and career opportunities, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education). A collaborative approach among stakeholders, policy support, and innovative practices are recommended to overcome potential obstacles and ensure the successful implementation of SMART therapy in educational settings.

摘要

SMART 项目提高了学生的记忆力、推理能力和战略思维能力,这些能力对学业成功和职业规划至关重要。本研究探讨了战略记忆高级推理训练(SMART)对高三学生的影响,旨在提高他们的决策能力并为大学学习做好准备。基于文献,提出了九个假设,将 SMART 项目实施疗法作为自变量,该自变量有四个子变量:认知技能、职业发展、社交技能和学术技能,以及它们对因变量(如职业决策)的影响。对 284 名高中生使用智能偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM),实施验证性因子分析(CFA)和结构方程模型(SEM)以确认测量模型。进行路径分析以确定自变量和因变量之间的关系。研究结果表明,SMART 疗法显著提高了认知能力、学业成绩、个人发展和社交技能,共同促进了高三学生更好地进行职业决策。然而,SMART 对职业决策的直接影响未得到支持,这表明社会和情感影响等其他因素也发挥了作用。这些发现表明,将 SMART 疗法纳入高中课程可以更好地让学生为未来的挑战和职业机会做好准备,这与可持续发展目标 4(优质教育)相一致。建议利益相关者采取协作方法、政策支持和创新实践,以克服潜在障碍并确保 SMART 疗法在教育环境中的成功实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/f7cc3d681f20/40359_2025_2767_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/c3ce4dc57222/40359_2025_2767_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/6bc51c7446ee/40359_2025_2767_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/f7cc3d681f20/40359_2025_2767_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/c3ce4dc57222/40359_2025_2767_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/6bc51c7446ee/40359_2025_2767_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f8/12036163/f7cc3d681f20/40359_2025_2767_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of strategic memory advanced reasoning training (SMART) therapy for enhancing final-year high school students career choices.战略记忆高级推理训练(SMART)疗法对提高高三学生职业选择的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 28;13(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02767-0.
2
Social-Emotional Skills, Career Adaptability, and Agentic School Engagement of First-Year High School Students.高一学生的社会情感技能、职业适应能力和主体学校参与度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 20;20(8):5597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085597.
3
Health management students' perceived soft skills acquisition and university commitment.健康管理专业学生对软技能的掌握情况及对大学的认同感。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07127-5.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
6
The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.IDEA评估工具:评估医学生住院病历中展示的报告、诊断推理和决策技能。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):163-73. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011654.
7
Determinants of the generalist career intentions of 1995 graduating medical students.1995年毕业的医学生通科医生职业意向的决定因素。
Acad Med. 1996 Feb;71(2):198-209. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199602000-00030.
8
The effectiveness of tools used to evaluate successful critical decision making skills for applicants to healthcare graduate educational programs: a systematic review.用于评估医疗保健研究生教育项目申请者成功关键决策技能的工具的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):231-75. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2322.
9
Parental authority as a mediator between career decision-making self-efficacy, career decision ambiguity tolerance, and career choice of nursing students: A path analysis.父母权威在护理学生职业决策自我效能感、职业决策模糊容忍度和职业选择之间的中介作用:路径分析。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;42:178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
An examination of the career decision-making self-efficacy of final-year nursing students.应届护理专业学生职业决策自我效能的研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jul;138:106196. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106196. Epub 2024 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of resilience-based interventions in schools for adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于复原力的干预措施对青少年学校教育的有效性:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;14:1211113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211113. eCollection 2023.
2
Exploring how brain health strategy training informs the future of work.探索大脑健康策略培训如何为未来工作提供信息。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 12;14:1175652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175652. eCollection 2023.
3
Effects of online brain training on self-reported mental health symptoms for generally healthy adults during the Covid-19 pandemic.
新冠疫情期间线上大脑训练对一般健康成年人自述心理健康症状的影响。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jan;13(1):e2853. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2853. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
The Development of Academic Achievement and Cognitive Abilities: A Bidirectional Perspective.学业成就与认知能力的发展:双向视角
Child Dev Perspect. 2020 Mar;14(1):15-20. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12352. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
5
Higher-Order Executive Function in Middle School: Training Teachers to Enhance Cognition in Young Adolescents.中学阶段的高阶执行功能:培训教师以提升青少年的认知能力
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:867264. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867264. eCollection 2022.
6
Positive Guidance Effect of Ideological and Political Education Integrated With Mental Health Education on the Negative Emotions of College Students.思想政治教育与心理健康教育融合对大学生负面情绪的正向引导作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 25;12:742129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742129. eCollection 2021.
7
A collaborative escape room as gamification strategy to increase learning motivation and develop curricular skills of occupational therapy students.协作式密室逃脱游戏作为一种游戏化策略,可提高职业治疗学生的学习动机和课程技能。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02973-5.
8
Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples.立意抽样:复杂还是简单?研究案例
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):652-661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Intelligence, health and death.智力、健康与死亡。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):416-430. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01078-9. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
Genetic variation, brain, and intelligence differences.遗传变异、大脑和智力差异。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):335-353. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01027-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.