• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者的衰弱:一项关于亚型识别的前瞻性观察队列研究。

Frailty in older adults patients: a prospective observational cohort study on subtype identification.

作者信息

Yang Zhikai, Ji Chen, Wang Ting, He Wei, Wan Yuhao, Zeng Min, Guo Di, Cui Lingling, Wang Hua

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 28;30(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02450-5.

DOI:10.1186/s40001-025-02450-5
PMID:40296178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12036271/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the FRAIL scale has been used in primary care, cluster analysis on frail patients in a hospital setting has not been performed.

OBJECTIVES

To identify potential subtypes of frail patients, and develop a simple, clinically applicable model for improved patient management.

METHODS

The study included 214 frail patients aged 65 and above who were hospitalized in a hospital in Beijing from September 2018 to April 2019. This study applied the K-means clustering algorithm to analyze 27 variables, determining the optimal cluster number using the Elbow method and Silhouette coefficient. Key variables for predictive modeling were identified through LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression, SVM-RFE (support vector machine-recursive feature elimination), and random forest techniques. A logistic regression model was then developed to predict patient subtypes, aimed at enhancing clinical identification and management of frailty subtypes.

RESULTS

Clustering analysis distinguished two unique subgroups among the frail patients, revealing significant disparities in clinical characteristics and survival outcomes. One-year survival rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 62.51% and 47.51%, respectively. The logistic regression model exhibited robust predictive capability, with an AUC (Area under curve) of 0.88. Validation through 1000 bootstrap resamples confirmed the model's reliability, with an average AUC of 0.8707 and a 95% CI (Confidence intervals) of 0.8572 to 0.8792.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies two frailty subtypes in a hospital setting using unsupervised machine learning, demonstrating significant differences in survival outcomes. Clinical Trial registration ChiCTR1800017204; date of reqistration: 07/18/2018.

摘要

背景

虽然衰弱量表已在初级保健中使用,但尚未对医院环境中的衰弱患者进行聚类分析。

目的

识别衰弱患者的潜在亚型,并开发一种简单、临床适用的模型以改善患者管理。

方法

该研究纳入了2018年9月至2019年4月在北京一家医院住院的214名65岁及以上的衰弱患者。本研究应用K均值聚类算法分析27个变量,使用肘部方法和轮廓系数确定最佳聚类数。通过LASSO(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)回归、支持向量机递归特征消除(SVM-RFE)和随机森林技术确定预测模型的关键变量。然后开发了一个逻辑回归模型来预测患者亚型,旨在加强对衰弱亚型的临床识别和管理。

结果

聚类分析在衰弱患者中区分出两个独特的亚组,揭示了临床特征和生存结果的显著差异。1类和2类的一年生存率分别为62.51%和47.51%。逻辑回归模型表现出强大的预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.88。通过1000次自助重采样验证证实了模型的可靠性,平均AUC为0.8707,95%置信区间(CI)为0.8572至0.8792。

结论

本研究使用无监督机器学习在医院环境中识别出两种衰弱亚型,表明生存结果存在显著差异。临床试验注册号:ChiCTR1800017204;注册日期:2018年7月18日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/59d2a25400a1/40001_2025_2450_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/12910d9405c0/40001_2025_2450_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/ddb767fdf4c3/40001_2025_2450_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/8432e9cd41d7/40001_2025_2450_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/59d2a25400a1/40001_2025_2450_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/12910d9405c0/40001_2025_2450_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/ddb767fdf4c3/40001_2025_2450_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/8432e9cd41d7/40001_2025_2450_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9557/12036271/59d2a25400a1/40001_2025_2450_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Frailty in older adults patients: a prospective observational cohort study on subtype identification.老年患者的衰弱:一项关于亚型识别的前瞻性观察队列研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 28;30(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02450-5.
2
Machine Learning Models for Frailty Classification of Older Adults in Northern Thailand: Model Development and Validation Study.泰国北部老年人衰弱分类的机器学习模型:模型开发与验证研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Apr 2;8:e62942. doi: 10.2196/62942.
3
Frailty and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Comparison of Different Frailty Measures.衰弱与老年住院患者不良结局风险:不同衰弱测量指标的比较。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):638.e7-638.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Identification and prediction of frailty among community-dwelling older Japanese adults based on Bayesian network analysis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.基于贝叶斯网络分析的日本社区老年人衰弱的识别与预测:一项横断面和纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):2141. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19697-y.
5
Using Existing Clinical Data to Measure Older Adult Inpatients' Frailty at Admission and Discharge: Hospital Patient Register Study.利用现有临床数据在入院和出院时衡量老年住院患者的虚弱程度:医院患者登记研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Oct 28;7:e54839. doi: 10.2196/54839.
6
Reweighting and validation of the hospital frailty risk score using electronic health records in Germany: a retrospective observational study.在德国使用电子健康记录对医院脆弱风险评分进行重新加权和验证:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05107-w.
7
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict frailty risk for elderly.开发和验证机器学习模型,以预测老年人的虚弱风险。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Dec;80(12):5064-5075. doi: 10.1111/jan.16192. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
8
Frailty in older adults admitted to hospital: outcomes from the Western Sydney Clinical Frailty Registry.入住医院的老年人的衰弱:西悉尼临床衰弱登记处的结果
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05715-0.
9
Enhancing the convenience of frailty index assessment for elderly Chinese people with machine learning methods.利用机器学习方法提高中国老年人衰弱指数评估的便利性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 5;14(1):23227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74194-x.
10
Development and Validation of a Nutritional Frailty Phenotype for Older Adults Based on Risk Prediction Model: Results from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.基于风险预测模型的老年人营养衰弱表型的开发与验证:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究结果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Feb;26(2):105425. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105425. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Random Forest and Stepwise Regression for Variable Selection Using Low Prevalence Predictors: A case Study in Paediatric Sepsis.使用低患病率预测因子进行变量选择时随机森林与逐步回归的比较:儿科脓毒症的案例研究
Matern Child Health J. 2025 May;29(5):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04038-1. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Physical frailty identification using machine learning to explore the 5-item FRAIL scale, Cardiovascular Health Study index, and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index.使用机器学习识别身体虚弱:探索 5 项 FRAIL 量表、心血管健康研究指数和骨质疏松性骨折研究指数。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1303958. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1303958. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessment and risk prediction of frailty using texture-based muscle ultrasound image analysis and machine learning techniques.
使用基于纹理的肌肉超声图像分析和机器学习技术对衰弱进行评估和风险预测。
Mech Ageing Dev. 2023 Oct;215:111860. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2023.111860. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Obesogenic diet and metabolic syndrome among adolescents in India: data-driven cluster analysis.印度青少年致肥胖饮食和代谢综合征:基于数据的聚类分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03429-y.
5
An investigation into epidemiological situations of COVID-19 with fuzzy K-means and K-prototype clustering methods.基于模糊 K-均值和 K-原型聚类方法的 COVID-19 流行病学情况调查。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33214-y.
6
Transforming Complex Problems Into K-Means Solutions.将复杂问题转化为 K-Means 解决方案。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 Jul;45(7):9149-9168. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3237667. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
Trajectories of Frailty With Aging: Coordinated Analysis of Five Longitudinal Studies.衰老过程中的衰弱轨迹:五项纵向研究的协同分析
Innov Aging. 2022 Jan 15;6(2):igab059. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab059. eCollection 2022.
8
Fire association with respiratory disease and COVID-19 complications in the State of Pará, Brazil.巴西帕拉州火灾与呼吸道疾病及新冠并发症的关联。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Feb;6:100102. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100102. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Handling missing data in a rheumatoid arthritis registry using random forest approach.采用随机森林方法处理类风湿关节炎注册研究中的缺失数据。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Oct;24(10):1282-1293. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14203. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Muscle, endocrine, and immunological markers of frailty in older people.老年人衰弱的肌肉、内分泌和免疫标志物。
Exp Gerontol. 2021 Aug;151:111405. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111405. Epub 2021 May 17.