• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类与生成式人工智能的合作提高了任务绩效,但削弱了人类的内在动机。

Human-generative AI collaboration enhances task performance but undermines human's intrinsic motivation.

作者信息

Wu Suqing, Liu Yukun, Ruan Mengqi, Chen Siyu, Xie Xiao-Yun

机构信息

School of Management, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):15105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98385-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-98385-2
PMID:40301425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12041296/
Abstract

In a series of four online experimental studies (total N = 3,562), we investigated the performance augmentation effect and psychological deprivation effect of human-generative AI (GenAI) collaboration in professional settings. Our findings consistently demonstrated that collaboration with GenAI enhanced immediate task performance. However, this performance augmentation effect did not persist in subsequent tasks performed independently by humans. Importantly, transitioning from collaboration with GenAI to solo work led to an increased sense of control of human workers, and was also accompanied by significant decreases in intrinsic motivation and increases in feelings of boredom. These results highlight the complex dual effects of human-GenAI collaboration: It enhances immediate task performance but can undermine long-term psychological experiences of human workers.

摘要

在一系列四项在线实验研究(总样本量N = 3562)中,我们调查了在专业环境中人类与生成式人工智能(GenAI)协作的绩效提升效应和心理剥夺效应。我们的研究结果一致表明,与GenAI协作可提高即时任务绩效。然而,这种绩效提升效应在人类随后独立完成的任务中并未持续存在。重要的是,从与GenAI协作过渡到独自工作会导致人类工作者的控制感增强,同时内在动机显著下降,无聊感增加。这些结果凸显了人类与GenAI协作的复杂双重效应:它提高了即时任务绩效,但可能会损害人类工作者的长期心理体验。

相似文献

1
Human-generative AI collaboration enhances task performance but undermines human's intrinsic motivation.人类与生成式人工智能的合作提高了任务绩效,但削弱了人类的内在动机。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):15105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98385-2.
2
An Ethical Perspective on the Democratization of Mental Health With Generative AI.生成式人工智能助力精神健康民主化的伦理视角
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Oct 17;11:e58011. doi: 10.2196/58011.
3
Decoding medical educators' perceptions on generative artificial intelligence in medical education.解码医学教育者对医学教育中生成式人工智能的看法。
J Investig Med. 2024 Oct;72(7):633-639. doi: 10.1177/10815589241257215. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence to Improve Motivation and Retrieval in Higher Education Learners.利用生成式人工智能提高高等教育学习者的学习动机和检索能力。
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Mar 11;11:e59210. doi: 10.2196/59210.
5
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine and Impact on Gastroenterology.临床医学中的生成式人工智能及其对胃肠病学的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.038.
6
Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning.生成式人工智能对人类学习的承诺和挑战。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):1839-1850. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
7
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education-Policies and Training at US Osteopathic Medical Schools: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey.美国整骨医学院医学教育中的生成式人工智能——政策与培训:描述性横断面调查
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Feb 11;11:e58766. doi: 10.2196/58766.
8
A tutorial activity for students to experience generative artificial intelligence: students' perceptions and actions.一项让学生体验生成式人工智能的教学活动:学生的认知与行为
Adv Physiol Educ. 2025 Jun 1;49(2):461-470. doi: 10.1152/advan.00245.2024. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
9
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Medicine Education.核医学教育中的生成式人工智能
J Nucl Med Technol. 2025 Mar 5;53(1):72-79. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.124.268323.
10
Health system-wide access to generative artificial intelligence: the New York University Langone Health experience.医疗系统范围内对生成式人工智能的应用:纽约大学朗格尼健康中心的经验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Feb 1;32(2):268-274. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae285.

引用本文的文献

1
The Neurophysiological Paradox of AI-Induced Frustration: A Multimodal Study of Heart Rate Variability, Affective Responses, and Creative Output.人工智能引发挫折感的神经生理悖论:一项关于心率变异性、情感反应和创造性产出的多模态研究
Brain Sci. 2025 May 25;15(6):565. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060565.

本文引用的文献

1
An empirical investigation of the impact of ChatGPT on creativity.ChatGPT 对创造力影响的实证研究。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):1906-1914. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01953-1. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content.生成式人工智能提高了个体创造力,但降低了新颖内容的整体多样性。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jul 12;10(28):eadn5290. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290.
3
ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks.在文本注释任务中,ChatGPT的表现优于众包工作者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 25;120(30):e2305016120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305016120. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
4
Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence.关于生成式人工智能生产力效应的实验证据。
Science. 2023 Jul 14;381(6654):187-192. doi: 10.1126/science.adh2586. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Creating a model of cross-task motivation - A meta-narrative review of the literature on dynamic motivation.构建跨任务动机模型——关于动态动机的文献元叙事综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 16;14:1193186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193186. eCollection 2023.
6
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory.运用自我决定理论理解并塑造工作的未来。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(7):378-392. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w. Epub 2022 May 10.
7
The state of boredom: Frustrating or depressing?无聊状态:令人沮丧还是压抑?
Motiv Emot. 2018;42(6):931-946. doi: 10.1007/s11031-018-9710-6. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
8
Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses.等效性检验:检验、相关性及荟萃分析实用入门指南
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 May;8(4):355-362. doi: 10.1177/1948550617697177. Epub 2017 May 5.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
From "we" to "me": Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being.从“我们”到“我”:群体认同增强了感知到的个人控制感,并对健康和幸福产生影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jul;109(1):53-74. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000019. Epub 2015 May 4.