Radu Yolanda Tarisayi, Mahomedy Sameera
SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science- PRICELESS SA, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 29;24(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02473-8.
Tackling the rise in non-communicable diseases stemming from the consumption of ultra-processed, nutrient-poor packaged foods is a growing health priority in South Africa. Front of package labels have emerged as an integral intervention to address the consumption of unhealthy foods that contribute to non-communicable diseases, yet laws mandating front of package labelling have faced counter arguments from the food and beverage industry. In this paper, we ground front of package labelling within the right to health, and highlight the comparative experience of countries that have implemented front of package labelling to foreshadow industry arguments against regulations published in South Africa.
The study uses a doctrinal methodology to examine the content and duties of the right to health by analysing legal texts, statutes, case law, and international treaties. The study also engages legal provisions and assesses judicial decisions to ascertain the scope of the right to health and the obligations imposed on states and other duty-bearers.
International law, African human rights law and the South African law have the enabling framework that recognises front of package labelling as a component of the right to health. This triggers the obligation to take reasonable legislative measures to ensure realisation of the right. A human rights framing of front of package labelling is of paramount importance given the vulnerability of individuals when considered within the context of powerful corporations as determinants of health.
The positioning of front of package labelling as a fundamental right to health issue places obligations on the government of South Africa and other governments to stem the rising burden of non-communicable diseases and provides a mechanism to improve determinants of health among vulnerable populations.
应对因食用超加工、营养匮乏的包装食品导致的非传染性疾病增多问题,已成为南非日益重要的健康优先事项。包装正面标签已成为解决导致非传染性疾病的不健康食品消费问题的一项重要干预措施,但强制实施包装正面标签的法律却遭到了食品和饮料行业的反对。在本文中,我们将包装正面标签置于健康权框架内,并强调已实施包装正面标签的国家的比较经验,以预示食品和饮料行业可能针对南非发布的相关法规提出的反对观点。
本研究采用教义学方法,通过分析法律文本、法规、判例法和国际条约来审视健康权的内容和义务。该研究还涉及法律条款并评估司法判决,以确定健康权的范围以及对国家和其他责任承担者施加的义务。
国际法、非洲人权法和南非法律具备认可包装正面标签为健康权组成部分的扶持性框架。这引发了采取合理立法措施以确保该权利得以实现的义务。鉴于在强大企业作为健康决定因素的背景下个人的脆弱性,从人权角度对包装正面标签进行界定至关重要。
将包装正面标签定位为健康权的基本问题,使南非政府和其他政府负有义务,以遏制非传染性疾病不断上升的负担,并提供一种机制来改善弱势群体的健康决定因素。