Suppr超能文献

不同冲洗技术对牙本质侵蚀及玷污层去除效果的评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究

Evaluation of different irrigation techniques on dentin erosion and smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopy study.

作者信息

Akçay Alper, Gorduysus Melahat, Aydin Berdan, Gorduysus Mehmet Omer

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2022 May-Jun;25(3):311-316. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_127_21. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation techniques EndoVac, RinsEndo, Canal CleanMax (CCMax), SonicMax, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), and Manual Needle Irrigation (MNI) on dentin erosion and smear layer removal using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy extracted single-rooted teeth were instrumented with ProTaper rotary instruments. The roots were randomly divided into six experimental groups ( = 10): EndoVac, RinsEndo, CCMax, SonicMax, PUI, and MNI. Final irrigation was performed with NaOCl followed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and NaOCl. Six roots served as control and were irrigated with only NaOCl. Next, the roots were sectioned in a buccolingual direction and the halves were examined by SEM. Smear layer and erosion scores were recorded in the cervical, middle and apical third of the roots. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney -tests with a level of significance α = 0.05.

RESULTS

PUI had the greatest amount of smear layer compared to other groups ( < 0.001). However, SonicMax had the greatest degree of erosion compared to RinsEndo, MNI, PUI, and EndoVac groups ( < 0.001) and CCMax group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RinsEndo and EndoVac techniques left the least amount of smear layer while causing erosion the least compared to CCMax, PUI, and MNI techniques.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估不同冲洗技术EndoVac、RinsEndo、Canal CleanMax(CCMax)、SonicMax、被动超声冲洗(PUI)和手动针管冲洗(MNI)对牙本质侵蚀和玷污层去除的效果。

材料与方法

70颗拔除的单根牙用ProTaper旋转器械进行预备。将牙根随机分为6个试验组(每组n = 10):EndoVac、RinsEndo、CCMax、SonicMax、PUI和MNI。最后用次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗,随后用乙二胺四乙酸和NaOCl冲洗。6个牙根作为对照组,仅用NaOCl冲洗。接下来,将牙根沿颊舌方向切开,对两半部分进行SEM检查。记录牙根颈段、中段和根尖段的玷污层和侵蚀评分。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行数据分析,显著性水平α = 0.05。

结果

与其他组相比,PUI的玷污层量最大(P < 0.001)。然而,与RinsEndo、MNI、PUI和EndoVac组相比,SonicMax的侵蚀程度最大(P < 0.001),与CCMax组相比差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

与CCMax、PUI和MNI技术相比,RinsEndo和EndoVac技术留下的玷污层最少,同时引起的侵蚀也最少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b1a/9274701/38537e725058/JCD-25-311-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验